The International Jew

Originally Published By
Henry Ford

Introduction By
Gerald L. K. Smith

Chapter 1 - Jewish History In The United States

·            Jews In Business

Chapter2 - Angles Of Jewish Influence

·            Labor And Jewry

·            The Churches And Jewry

·            Jewry In Schools AndColleges

·            What To Do About It?

·            Name The Enemy!

Chapter3 - Victims, Or Persecutors

·            Jews Object To"Americanism."

·            Jews And The "ReligiousPersecution" Cry

Chapter4 - Are The Jews A Nation?

·            Race Or Religion

·            The Policy Of"Misrepresentation"

·            Disraeli Portrays The Jews

Chapter5 - The Jewish Political Program

·            Jewish Nationalism And TheProtocols

Chapter6 - An Introduction To The "Jewish Protocols"

·            Racial Divergencies

·            Problem Of Origin

·            Gentile Stupidity

·            Divide And Rule

·            Protocols Claim PartialFulfillment

·            Conquest Of Religion AndPress

·            Note On The Dispersal

·            Splitting Society By"Ideas"

Chapter7 - How The Jews Use Power

·            The Jewish Demand For"Rights" In America

·            "Jewish Rights"Clash With American Rights

·            Attacks On Christianity

·            The Cry Of"Anti-Semitism"

Chapter8 - Jewish Influence In American Politics

·            Aliens And TammanyLeadership

·            Jews And The White SlaveScandal

Chapter9 - Bolshevism And Zionism

·            Jewish-Red-Links

·            Will Jewish Zionism BringArmageddon?

·            Land-Grabbing

Chapter10 - Jewish Supremacy In The Theatre And Cinema

·            Mechanics And Fake"Stars"

·            Rise Of The JewishTheatrical Trust

·            Critics"Controlled"

·            The All-Jewish"Movies"

Chapter11 - Jewish Jazz Becomes Our National Music

·            How The Jewish Song TrustMakes You Sing

·            Plagiarism

·            Tin-Pan-Alley

·            Not So "Popular"

Chapter12 - Liquor, Gambling, Vice And Corruption

·            How The Jewish Liquor TrustWorked

·            Old Names Bought Up

·            "Nigger Gin"

·            The Reasoned Answer

·            Jewish Gamblers CorruptAmerican Sports

·            Wrestling

Chapter13 - The World's Foremost Problem

·            What Is"Anti-Semitism"?

·            Why Discuss The JewishQuestion?

·            The Answer - Too MuchPower!!

·            Why The "InternationalJew"?

·            Power Follows TheInternational Jew

·            "When AmericaAwakes!"

Chapter14 - The High And Low Of Jewish Money-Power

·            The Rothschild Method

·            Scope Of Jewish Money Power

·            "Disraeli OfAmerica" A Jew Of Super-Power

·            Dictator Baruch

Chapter15 - The Battle For Press Control

·            Bennett's Struggle

Chapter16 - The State Of All-Judaan

Introduction

GeraldL.K. Smith

At the apex of his business careerHenry Ford, the industrial genius sensed that a terrific effort was being madeto take his business from him and manipulate it into the hands of themoney-changers. Mr. Ford had the impression that these manipulators were beingengineered by powerful Jewish financiers.

He called to his office the mostintelligent research men within his acquaintance. He commissioned them to make athorough study of the International Jew and publish their findings in "TheDearborn Independent," which at that time was the official organ of theFord Motor Company. No expense was spared, and it is estimated that literallymillions of dollars were spent by Mr. Ford on this project. The originalarticles were carried first in "The Dearborn Independent," and thenpublished in book form.

I have in my possession every copy of"The Dearborn Independent." This complete set is beautifully bound inMorocco leather and was given to me by an inner-circle member of Mr. Ford'spersonal staff.

When the report on "TheInternational Jew" was originally published it opened each chapter with atext taken from "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion," or fromthe published statements of world prominent Jews. The moment the manuscriptsdealing with the Jewish problem reached the public, a terrific howl went up fromofficial Jewry. If I were to summarize the campaign of reprisal and abuse whichwas carried on against Mr. Ford and his Company, this summary alone wouldrequire a book. Every instrument of torture and abuse which could he imaginedwas carried on against Mr. Ford – smear, character assassination, ridicule,physical threat, boycott. The pressure was constant, consistent and endless. Themost powerful and enigmatic pressures imaginable were brought to bear on Mr.Ford to stop the publication of "The International Jew." Finally theorder came through to cease publication and to destroy the copies which wereavailable. Jews and others went into the bookstores and bought and destroyed allcopies which could be found. Sneak thieves were commissioned to visit librariesand steal the report out of the libraries. This made the book so rare andunfindable that it became a collector’s item.

The day finally came when the oneambition of the Jews was fulfilled. Mr. Ford apologized for publishing "TheInternational Jew" and blamed subordinates for the deed.

In 1940 I interviewed Mr. Ford onnumerous occasions. In fact, on the day before his first automobile was putunder glass, he and Mrs. Ford invited Mrs. Smith and myself to be their guestsat Dearborn. On this occasion he told me the whole story of his first car andhow he happened to make it. Among the precious souvenirs which have come to Mrs.Smith and myself is a New Testament autographed by Mr. Ford, and handwrittenletters from Mrs. Ford commenting favorably on some of my speeches andexpressing in her own handwriting Mr. Ford’s appreciation for my activities.

It was on the occasion of one of thesepersonal visits with Mr. Ford that he gave me a sensational and shocking report.He said: "Mr. Smith, my apology for publishing ‘The International Jew’was given great publicity, but I did not sign that apology. It was signed byHarry Bennett."

For the information of the readerHarry Bennett was a very officious and aggressive employee of the Ford MotorCompany. He presumed his way into the confidence of Mr. Ford and later becameknown as an enigmatic and obnoxious personality. Space will not permit athorough discussion of the activities of Harry Bennett. Mr. Ford's personalsecretary for 34 years, Mr. Ernest Liebold, told me that one of the worst thingsthat ever happened to the Ford Motor Company was the employment of HarryBennett. For a certain period of time Bennett exerted virtually a dictatorialcontrol over the affairs of the Company. His alleged deeds, if summarized mightmake rather a scandalous book.

When Mr. Ford told me that he had notsigned the apology, it seemed almost unbelievable. In fact, I could scarcelybelieve my own ears. Furthermore, on the occasion of this same visit, Mr. Fordsaid: "Mr. Smith, I hope to republish ‘The International Jew’ againsome time." He showed no signs of regret for having published it in thebeginning.

I did not report this conversationeven to my most faithful followers because the original ‘apology’ had beenso thoroughly publicized that I knew it would be difficult to make peoplebelieve what I had heard from Mr. Ford’s own lips.

After Mr. Ford died, the man HarryBennett evidently was very much disillusioned and embittered by the fact that hedid not share generously in the inheritance. He collaborated with a Jew by thename of Paul Marcus in the writing of a book entitled '"We Never Called HimHenry."

Here is Mr. Bennett’s own storyconcerning the much publicized "apology" Mr. Ford is supposed to havemade for exposing the machinations of the International Jew. Here are Mr.Bennett’s own words:

·               "I gotin touch with Arthur Brisbane, and through him learned that the American JewishCommittee could settle the matter. I entered into negotiations with SamuelUntermeyer and Louis Marshall of that organization, and with Brisbane. They drewup the now-famous ‘apology,’ which was to be the basis for a settlement. Inthis formal statement, it was said that Mr. Ford would see to it that no moreanti-Semitic material circulated in his name and that he would call in allundistributed copies of ‘The International Jew,’ which were booklet reprintsof the (Dearborn) Independent's articles. For the rest, the ‘apology’ saidthat Mr. Ford had had no knowledge of what had been published in the DearbornIndependent, and was ‘shocked’ and ‘mortified’ to learn about it.

·               "ArthurBrisbane brought this statement to me at 1710 Broadway. I phoned Mr. Ford. Itold him an ‘apology’ had been drawn up, and added ‘It’s pretty bad, Mr.Ford.’ I tried to read it to him over the phone, but he stopped me.

·               "So Isigned Mr. Ford’s signature to the document. I had always been able to signhis name as realistically as he could himself. I sent the statement toUntermeyer and Marshall. The signature was verified, and the case was closed.

·               "Allthis was done without Mr. Ford’s taking anyone else into his confidence. Edselknew nothing about it, and Cameron and Senator Reed heard about it by readingthe papers.

·               "Cameron’sreaction was quoted by the newspaper: ‘It’s all news to me and I cannotbelieve it is true’."

Later, Mr. Bennett’s story appearedin abbreviated form in True Magazine. The above quotation appeared on page 125of that magazine for October, 1951.

I give the reader this information inorder that he may read what follows without the risk of any deception concerningthe Ford apology.

To summarize:

1.       The pressquoted Mr. Ford as apologizing for the publication of "The InternationalJew."

2.       Mr. Fordtold me in the presence of Mrs. Ford, Mrs. Smith and Mr. Ernest Liebold (hissecretary for 34 years) that he hoped to republish it and that he did not signthe apology.

3.       Mr.Bennett, who at one time was one of the three most powerful individualsconnected with the Ford Motor Company, admits that Mr. Ford did not sign theapology but that he (Bennett) copied Mr. Ford's signature with accuracy and thatthis signature is the only one which appeared on the formal apology.

As far as I am concerned, I am willingto base my Conclusions relative to the report ("The InternationalJew") on the personal statement which Mr. Ford made to me.

Whatever the case may be, the reportin its original form as well as the abridged edition herewith, speaks for itselfand is supported by the logic of its contents.

Concerning "The Protocols of theLearned Elders of Zion" Mr. Ford said on February 17, 1921: "The onlystatement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what isgoing on . . . They have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit itnow.

It must be observed that when Mr. Fordmade this statement concerning the Protocols in relationship to his publication"The International Jew," this document, which is allegedly the secretminutes of the Elders of Zion, was only 16 years old. The Jews had advertised tothe world that "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" wereforgeries. Mr. Ford wasted no time arguing this question. He merely said to hisfriends: "No matter what they are, they fit what is going on."

Some students of the situation havepointed out that even the word "forgery" implies that the objectreferred to is an accurate reproduction of the original. For that reason everystudent of the Jewish problem should have a copy of "The Protocols of theLearned Eiders of Zion." Copies may be obtained by addressing orders to theChristian Nationalist Crusade, P. O. Box 27895, Los Angeles 27, California.Price 50c.

In his book entitled "My Life and Work," which was published in 1922, Mr. Fordcomments on his "International Jew" series with the following words:

·               "Readersof our articles will see at once that we are not actuated by any kind ofprejudice, except it may be a prejudice in favor of the principles which havemade our civilization.

·               "Therehad been observed in this country certain streams of influence which werecausing a marked deterioration in our literature, amusements, and socialconduct; business was departing from its old-time substantial soundness; ageneral letting-down of standards were felt everywhere. It was not the robustcoarseness of the white man, the rude indelicacy, say, of Shakespeare’scharacters, but a nasty Orientalism which has insidiously affected every channelof expression – and to such an extent that it was time to challenge it. Thefact that these influences are all traceable to one racial source is a fact tobe reckoned with . . . Our work does not pretend to say the last word on the Jewin America. It says only the word which describes his present impress on thiscountry. When that impress is changed, the report can be changed . . . Ouropposition is only to ideas, false ideas, which are sapping the moral stamina ofthe people. These ideas proceed from easily identified sources, they arepromulgated by easily discoverable methods and they are controlled by mereexposure.

·               "Whenpeople learn to identify the source and nature of the influence swirling aroundthem, it is sufficient.. Let the American people once understand that it is notnatural degeneracy but calculated subversion that afflicts us, and they aresafe.

·               "Theexplanation is the cure. This work was taken up without personal motives. Whenit reached a stage where we believed the American people could grasp the key, welet it rest for the time. Our enemies say that we began it for revenge and thatwe laid it down in fear. Time will show that our critics (the Jews) are merelydealing in evasion because they dare not tackle the main question."

No mature-minded thinker – in fact,no honest reader, could question Mr. Ford’s logic as summarized above. I agreecompletely with Mr. Ford in his expressed convictions that all America and theworld needs is to know the truth ‘and the truth shall set us free.’

Gerald L. K. Smith

"We must force the Gentilegovernments to adopt measures which will promote our broadly conceived planalready approaching its triumphal goal by bringing to bear the pressure ofstimulated public opinion which has in reality been organized by us with thehelp of the so called ‘great power’ of the press. With few exceptions, notworth considering, it has already fallen into our hands."

-The Seventh Protocol

1. Jewish History In The United States

The story of the Jews in Americabegins with Christopher Columbus. On August 2, 1492, more than 300,000 Jews wereexpelled from Spain and on August 3, the next day, Columbus set sail for thewest taking a group of Jews with him.

They were not, however, refugees, forthe prophetic navigator’s plans had aroused the sympathy of influential Jewsfor a long period previously. Columbus himself tells us that he consorted muchwith Jews. The first letter he wrote detailing his discoveries was to a Jew.Indeed, the eventful voyage itself which added to men’s knowledge and wealth"the other half of the earth" was made possible by Jews. The pleasantstory that it was Queen Isabella's jewels which financed the voyage hasdisappeared under cool research.

There were three Maranos or"secret Jews" who wielded great influence at the Spanish court: Luisde Santagel, who was an important merchant of Valencia and who was"farmer" of the royal taxes; his relative, Gabriel Sanchez, who wasthe royal treasurer; and their friend, the royal chamberlain, Juan Cabrero.These worked unceasingly on Queen Isabella’s imagination, picturing to her thedepletion of the royal treasury and the likelihood of Columbus discovering thefabulous gold of the Indies, until the Queen was ready to offer her jewels inpawn for the funds. But Santagel craved permission to advance the money himself,which he did, 17,000 ducats in all, about 5,000 pounds, perhaps equal to 40,000pounds today.

Associated with Columbus in the voyagewere at least five Jews: Luis de Torres, interpreter; Marco, the surgeon;Bernal, the physician; Alonzo de la Calle, and Gabriel Sanchez. Luis de Torreswas the first man ashore, the first to discover the use of tobacco; he settledin Cuba and may be said to be the father of Jewish control of the tobaccobusiness as it exists today.

Columbus' old patrons, Luis deSantagel and Gabriel Sanchez, received many privileges for the part they playedin the work, but Columbus himself became the victim of a conspiracy fostered byBernal, the ship’s doctor, and suffered injustice and imprisonment as hisreward.

From that beginning, Jews looked moreand more to America as a fruitful field, and immigration set in strongly towardSouth America, principally Brazil. But because of military participation in adisagreement between the Brazilians and the Dutch, the Jews of Brazil found itnecessary to emigrate, which they did in the direction of the Dutch colony ofwhat is now New York. Peter Stuyvesant, the Dutch governor did not entirelyapprove of their settling among his people and ordered them to leave, but theJews had evidently taken the precaution to assure their being received if notwelcomed, because upon revoking the order of Stuyvesant, the Directors gave asone of the reasons for the Jews being received, "the large amount ofcapital which they have invested in the shares of the Company."

Nevertheless they were forbidden toenter public service and to open retail shops, which had the effect of drivingthem into foreign trade in which they were soon exercising all but a monopolybecause of their European connections.

This is only one of the thousandillustrations which can be given of the resourcefu1ness of the Jew. Forbid himin one direction he will excel in another. When he was forbidden to deal in newclothes, he sold old clothes – that was the beginning of the organized trafficin secondhand clothing. When he was forbidden to deal in merchandise, he dealtin waste – the Jew is the originator of the waste product business of theworld; he was the originator of the salvage system; he found wealth in thedebris of civilization. He taught people how to use old rags, how to clean oldfeathers, how to use gall nuts and rabbit skins. He has always had a taste forthe furrier trade which he now controls, and to him is due the multitude ofcommon skins which now pass under various alluring trade names as furs of highorigin.

Unwittingly, old Peter Stuyvesantcompelled the Jews to make New York the principal port of America, and though amajority of New York Jews had fled to Philadelphia at the time of the AmericanRevolution, most of them returned to New York at the earliest opportunity,instinct seeming to make them aware that in New York was to be their principalparadise of gain. And so it has proved.

New York is the greatest center ofJewish population in the world. It is the gateway where the bulk of Americanimports and exports are taxed, and where practically all the business done inAmerica pays tribute to the masters of money. The very land of the city is theholdings of the Jews.

No wonder that Jewish writers, viewingthis unprecedented prosperity, this unchecked growth in wealth and power,exclaim enthusiastically that the United States is the Promised Land foretold bythe prophets, and New York the New Jerusalem. Some have gone even further anddescribed the peaks of the Rockies as "the mountains of Zion," andwith reason, too, if the mining and coastal wealth of the Jews is considered.

Jews In Business

In the time of George Washington therewere about 4,000 Jews in the country, most of them well to do traders. Theyfavored the American side and helped the revolutionary colonies out with loansat critical moments.

In fifty years the traceable increasein the Jewish population of the United States was more than 3,300,000. What itis today no man can estimate with any hope of accuracy.

To make a list of the lines ofbusiness controlled by the Jews of the United States would be to touch most ofthe vital industries of the country – those which are really vital, and thosewhich cultivated habit have been made to seem vital. The theatrical business isexclusively Jewish; play-producing, booking, theater operation are all in thehands of Jews. This accounts for the fact that in almost every production todaycan be detected propaganda, sometimes glaringly commercial advertisement,sometimes direct political instruction.

The motion picture industry; the sugarindustry; the tobacco industry; fifty per cent or more of the meat packingindustry; over sixty per cent of the shoemaking industry; most of the musicalpurveying done in the country; jewelry; grain; cotton; oil; steel; magazineauthorship; news distribution; the liquor business; the loan business; these, toname only the industries with national and international sweep, are in controlof the Jews of the United States, either alone or in association with Jewsoverseas.

The American people would be vastlysurprised if they could see a line-up of some of the "AmericanBusinessmen" who hold up our commercial prestige overseas. They are mostlyJews. This may throw a sidelight on the regard in which "American businessmethods" are held in some parts of the world. When many different races ofpeople can carry on business under the name "American," and do itlegally, too, it is not surprising that Americans do not recognize some of thedescriptions of American methods which appear in foreign Press. If thereputation of American business has suffered, it is because something other thanAmerican methods have been used under the American name.

Instances of Jewish prosperity in theUnited States are commonplace, but prosperity, the just reward offoresight and application, is not to be confounded with control. It wouldbe impossible for any Gentile coalition under similar circumstances to attainthe control which the Jews have won, for the reason that there is lacking in theGentile a certain quality of working-togetherness, a certain conspiracy ofobjective, and the adhesiveness of intense raciality, which characterizes theJew. It is nothing to a Gentile that another man is a Gentile; it is next toeverything to a Jew that the man at his door is another Jew.

The International Jewish plan to movetheir money market to the United States was what the American people did notwant. We have the warning of history as to what this means. It has meant in turnthat Spain, Venice, Germany or Great Britain received the blame or suspicion ofthe world for what the Jewish financiers have done. It is a most importantconsideration that most of the national animosities that exist today arose outof resentment against what Jewish money power did under the camouflage ofnational names.

"The British did this","The Germans did this", when it was the International Jew who did it,the nations being but the marked spaces on his checker board. Today, around theworld the blaming word is heard, "The United States did this. If it werenot for the United States the world would be in a better shape. The Americansare a sordid, greedy, cruel people."

Why? Because the Jewish money power iscentered here and is making money out of both our community and Europe’sdistress, playing one against the other; and because so many so-called"American businessmen" abroad today are not Americans at all – theyare Jews.

Citizens wake up with a start to findthat even the white nations are hardly allowed to see each other nowadays exceptthrough Jewish eyes. Great Britain and France seldom see a special Americanspokesman who is not a Jew. That may be the reason why they reciprocate bysending Jews to us, thinking perhaps that we prefer them.

_____________________________________

"We will force up wages, whichhowever will be of no benefit to workers, for we at the same time will cause arise in the prices of prime necessities, pretending that this is due to declineof agriculture and of cattle raising. We will also artfully and deeply underminethe sources of production by instilling in the workmen ideas of anarchy andencourage them in the use of alcohol, at the same time taking measures to driveall the intellectual forces of the Gentiles from the land."

-The Sixth Protocol

2. Angles Of Jewish Influence

The Jewish Question exists whereverJews appear, says Theodor Herzl, because they bring it with them. It is nottheir numbers that create the Question, for there is in almost every country alarger number of other aliens than of Jews. It is not their much-boastedability, for it is now coming to be understood that, give the Jew an equal startand hold him to the rules of the game, and he is not smarter than anyone else;indeed, in one great class of Jews the zeal is quenched when opportunity forintrigue is removed.

The Jewish Question is not the numberof Jews who reside here, not in the American’s jealousy of the Jew’ssuccess, certainly not in any objection to the Jew’s Mosaic religion; it is insomething else, and that something else is the fact of Jewish influence on thelife of the country where Jews dwell; in the United States it is the Jewishinfluence on American life.

That the Jews exert an influence, theythemselves loudly proclaim. The Jews claim, indeed, that the fundamentals of theUnited States are Jewish and not Christian, and that the entire history of thiscountry should be re-written to make proper acknowledgement of the prior glorydue Judah. If the question of influence rested entirely on the Jewish claim,there would be no occasion for doubt; they claim it all. But it is kindness tohold them to the facts; it is also more clearly explanatory of the conditions inour country.

If they insist that they "gave usour Bible" and "gave us our God" and "gave us ourreligion," as they do over and over again with nauseating superciliousnessthroughout all their polemic publications – not a single one of theseclaims being true – they must not grow impatient and profane while wecomplete the list of the real influences they have set at work inAmerican life.

It is not the Jewish people but the Jewishidea, and the people only as vehicles of the idea, that is the point atissue. In this investigation of the Jewish Question, it is Jewish influence andthe Jewish Idea that are being discovered and defined.

The Jews are propagandists. This wasoriginally their mission. But they were to propagate the central tenet of theirreligion. This they failed to do. By failing in this they, according to theirown Scriptures, failed everywhere. They are now without a mission of blessing.Few of their leaders even claim a spiritual mission. But the idea is still withthem in a degenerate form; it represents the grossest materialism of the day; ithas become a means of sordid acquisition instead of a channel of service.

Labour And Jewry

The essence of the Jewish Idea inits influence on the labor world is the same as in all other departments –the destruction of real values in favor of fictitious values. The Jewishphilosophy of money is not to "make money," but to "getmoney." The distinction between these two is fundamental. That explainsJews being "financiers" instead of "captains of industry."It is the difference between "getting" and "making."

The creative, constructive type ofmind has an affection for the thing it is doing. The non-Jewish worker formerlychose the work he liked best. He did not change employment easily, because therewas a bond between him and the kind of work he had chosen. Nothing else was soattractive to him. He would rather draw a little less money and do what he likedto do, than a little more and do what irked him. The "maker" is alwaysthus influenced by his liking.

Not so the "getter." Itdoesn't matter what he does, so long as the income is satisfactory. He has noillusions, sentiments or affections on the side of work. It is the"geld" that counts. He has no attachment for the things he makes, forhe doesn't make any; he deals in the things which other men make and regardsthem solely on the side of their money-making value. "The joy of creativelabor" is nothing to him, not even an intelligible saying.

Now, previous to the advent of Jewishsocialistic and subversive ideas, the predominant thought in the labor world wasto "make" things and thus "make" money. There was a prideamong mechanics. Men who made things were a sturdy, honest race because theydealt with ideas of skill and quality, and their very characters were formed bythe satisfaction of having performed useful functions in society. They were theMakers. And society was solid so long as they were solid. Men made shoes asexhibitions of their skill. Farmers raised crops for the inherent love of crops,not with reference to far-off money-markets. Everywhere THE JOB was the main andthe rest was incidental.

The only way to break down this strongsafeguard of society – a creative laboring class of sturdy character – wasto sow other ideas among it; and the most dangerous of all the ideas sown wasthat which substituted "get" for "make."

With the required manipulation of themoney and food markets, enough pressure could be brought to bear on the ultimateconsumers to give point to the idea of "get," and it was not longbefore the internal relations of American business were totally upset, with Jewsat the head of the banking system, and Jews at the head of both the conservativeand radical elements of the Labor Movement, and, most potent of all, theJewish Idea sowed through the minds of workingmen. What Idea? The idea of"get" instead of "make."

The idea of "get" is avicious, anti-social and destructive idea when held alone; but when heldin company with "make" and as second in importance, it is legitimateand constructive. As soon as a man or a class is inoculated with the strictlyJewish idea of "getting" – ("getting mine"; "gettingwhile the getting is good"; "honestly if you can, dishonestly if youmust – but get it" – all of which are notes of this treasonablephilosophy), the very cement of human society loses it adhesiveness and beginsto crumble. The great myth and fiction of Money has been forced into the placeof real things, and the second step of the drama can thus be opened up.

Jewish influence on the thought of theworking-men of the United States, as well as on the thought of business andprofessional men, has been bad, thoroughly bad. This is not manifested in adivision between "capital" and "labor," for there are nosuch separate elements; there is only the executive and operating departments ofAmerican business. The real division is between the Jewish Idea of"get" and the Anglo-Saxon idea of "make," and at the presenttime the Jewish idea has been successful enough to have caused an upset.

All over the United States, in manybranches of trade, Communist colleges are maintained, officered and taught byJews. These so-called colleges exist in Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Rochester,Pittsburgh, New York, Philadelphia and other cities, the whole intent being toput all American labor on a "get" basis, which must prove the economicdamnation of the country. That is the end sought, as in Russia.

Until Jews can show that theinfiltration of foreign Jews and the Jewish Idea into the American labormovement has made for the betterment in character and estate, in citizenship andeconomic statesmanship, the charge of being an alien, destructive andtreasonable influence will have to stand.

The Churches And Jewry

The last place the uninstructedobserver would look for traces of Jewish influence is in the Christian Church,yet if he fails to look there he will miss much. If the libraries of ourtheological seminaries were equipped with complete files of Jewish literaryeffort during recent decades, and if the theological students were required toread these Jewish utterances there would be less silly talk and fewer "easymarks" for Jewish propaganda in the American pulpit. For the next 25 yearsevery theological seminary should support a chair for the study of Modern Jewishinfluence and the Protocols. The fiction, that the Jews are an Old Testamentpeople faithful to the Mosaic Law, would then be exploded, and timid Christianswould no longer superstitiously hesitate to speak the truth about them becauseof that sadly misinterpreted text: "I will bless them that bless thee, andcurse him that curseth thee."

There is a mission for the pulpit to liberatethe Church from what the New Testament Scriptures call "the fear of theJews." The pulpit has also the mission of liberating the Church from theerror that Judah and Israel are synonymous. The reading of the Scriptures whichconfuse the tribe of Judah with Israel, and which interpret every mention ofIsrael as signifying the Jews, is at the root of more than one-half theconfusion and division traceable in Christian doctrinal statements.

The Jews are NOT "The ChosenPeople," though practically the entire Church has succumbed to thepropaganda which declares them to be so. The Jewish tinge of thought has of lateyears overspread many Christian statements, and the uninstructed clergy haveproved more and more amenable to Jewish suggestion.

The flaccid condition of the Church,so much deplored by spokesmen who had regard for inner life, was brought aboutnot by "science," not by "scholarship," not by the"increase of light and learning" – for none of these things areantagonistic even to incomplete statements of truth – but by Jewish-GermanHigher Criticism. The defenders of the faith have fought long and valiantlyagainst the inroads made by the so-called Higher Criticism, but were sadlyincapacitated in their defense, because they did not see that its origin andpurpose were Jewish. It was not Christian; it was not German; it was Jewish.

It is perfectly in keeping with theJewish World Program that this destructive influence should be sent out underJewish auspices, and it is perfectly in keeping with non-Jewish trustfulness toaccept the thing without looking at its sources. The Church is now victim of asecond attack against her, in the rampant Socialism and Sovietism that have beenthrust upon her in the name of flabby and unmoral theories of"brotherhood" and in an appeal to her "fairness." The churchhas been made to believe that she is a forum for discussion and not a high placefor annunciation.

Jews have actually invaded in personand in program, hundreds of American churches, with their subversive andimpossible social ideals and at last become so cocksure of their domination ofthe situation that they were met with the inevitable check.

Clergymen ought to know thatseven-eighths of the economic mush they speak from the pulpit is prepared byJewish professors of political economy and revolutionary leaders. They should beinformed that economic thought has been so completely Judaized by means of adeliberate and masterly plan of camouflaged propaganda, that the mass-thought ofthe crowd (which is the thought mostly echoed in "popular" pulpits andeditorials) is more Jewish than Jewery itself holds.

The Jew has got hold of the Church indoctrine, in liberalism, so-called, and in the feverish and feeble sociologicaldiversions of many classes. If there is any place where a straight study of theJewish Question should be made it is in the modern Church which is unconsciouslygiving allegiance to a mass of Jewish propaganda. It is not reaction that iscounselled here; it is progress along constructive paths, the paths of ourforefathers, the Anglo-Saxons, who have to this day been the World-Builders, theMakers of cities and commerce and continents; and not the Jews who have neverbeen builders or pioneers, who have never peopled the wilderness, but who movein upon the labors of other men. They are not to be blamed for not beingBuilders or Pioneers, perhaps; they are to be blamed for claiming all the rightsof pioneers; but even then, perhaps, their blame ought not to be so great as theblame that rests upon the sons of Anglo-Saxons for rejecting thestraight-forward Building of their fathers, and taking up with the doubtfulideas of Judah.

Jewry In Schools And Colleges

Colleges are being constantly invadedby the Jewish Idea. The sons of the Anglo-Saxons are being attacked in theirvery heredity. The sons of the Builders, the Makers, are being subverted to thephilosophy of the destroyers. Young men in the first exhilarating months ofintellectual freedom are being seized with promissory doctrines, the source andconsequences of which they do not see. There is a natural rebelliousness ofyouth, which promises progress; there is a natural venturesomeness to play freewith ancient faiths; both of which are ebullitions of the spirit andsignificance of dawning mental virility. It is during the periods when theseadolescent expansions are in process that the youth is captured by influenceswhich deliberately lie in wait for him at the colleges. True, in after years alarge proportion come to their senses sufficiently to be able "to sit onthe fence and see themselves go by," and they come back to sanity. Theyfind that "freelove" doctrines make exhilarating club topics, but thatthe Family – the old-fashioned loyalty of one man and one woman to each otherand their children – is the basis not only of society, but of all personalcharacter and progress. They find that Revolution, while a delightful subjectfor fiery debates and an excellent stimulant to the feeling ofsuperman-likeness, is nevertheless not the process of progress.

The trouble with the colleges hasprogressed along precisely the same lines that have been described in connectionwith the churches. First, Jewish higher criticism in the destruction of youngmen’s sense of respect for the ancient foundations; second, Jewishrevolutionary social doctrines. The two always go together. They cannot liveapart. They are the fulfillment of the Protocol's program to split non-Jewishsociety by means of ideas.

It is idle to attack the"radicalism" of college students – these are the qualities ofimmaturity. But it is not idle to show that social radicalism("radicalism" being a very good word very sadly misused) comes from aJewish source. The central group of Red philosophers in every university is aJewish group, with often enough a "Gentile front" in the shape of adeluded professor. Some of these professors are in the pay of outside Redorganizations. There are Intercollegiate Socialist Societies, swarming withJews and Jewish influences, and toting Jewish professors around the country,addressing fraternities under the patronage of the best civic and universityauspices. Student lecture courses are fine pasture for this propaganda, thepurpose being to give the students the thrill of believing that they are takingpart in the beginning of a new great movement, comparable to the winning ofIndependence.

The revolutionary forces which head upin Jewry rely very heavily on the respectability which is given their movementby the adhesion of students and a few professors. It was so in Russia –everyone knows what the name "'student"' eventually came to signify inthat country. The Jewish Chautauqua, which works almost exclusively in collegesand universities, together with Bolshevism in art, science, religion, economicsand sociology, are driving straight through the Anglo-Saxon traditions andlandmarks of our race of students. These are ably assisted by professors andclergymen whose thinking has been dislocated and poisoned by Jewish subversiveinfluences in theology and sociology.

What To Do About It?

Simply identify the source and natureof the influence which has overrun our schools and universities. Let thestudents know that their choice is between the Anglo-Saxon and the Tribe ofJudah. Let the students decide, in making up their allegiance, whether they willfollow the Builders or those who seek to tear down. It is not a case forargument. The only absolute antidote to the Jewish influence is to call collegestudents back to a pride of race.

We often speak of the Fathers as ifthey were the few who happened to affix their signatures to a great documentwhich marked a new era of liberty. The Fathers of our nation were the men of theAnglo-Saxon-Celtic race. The men who came from Europe with civilization in theirblood and in their destiny. The men who crossed the Atlantic and set upcivilization on a bleak and rock-bound coast; the men who drove north to Alaskaand west to California; the men who opened up the tropics and subdued thearctics; the men who mastered the African veldt; the men who peopled Australiaand seized the gates of the world at Suez, Gibraltar and Panama; men who havegiven form to every government and a livelihood to every people and an ideal toevery century. They got neither their God nor their religion from Judah, nor yettheir speech nor their creative genius - they are the Ruling People. Chosenthroughout the centuries to Master the world, by building it ever better andbetter, and not by breaking it down.

Into the camp of this race, among thesons of the rulers, comes a people that has no civilization to point to, noaspiring religion, no universal speech, no great achievement in any realm butthe realm of "get," cast out of every land that gave them hospitality,and these people endeavor to tell the Sons of the Saxons what is needed to makethe world what it ought to be!

If our sons follow this counsel ofdark rebellion and destruction, it is because they do not know whose sons theyare, of what race they are the scions. Let there be free speech to the limit inour universities and free intercourse of ideas, but let Jewish thoughts belabelled Jewish, and let our sons know the racial secret.

Name The Enemy!

The warning has already gone outthrough the colleges. The system of Jewish procedure is already fully known. Howsimple it is! First, you secularize the public schools –"secularize" is the precise word the Jews use for the process. Youprepare the mind of the public school child by enforcing the rule that nomention shall ever be made to indicate that culture or patriotism is in any wayconnected with the deeper principles of the Anglo-Saxon religion. Keep it out,every sight and sound of it! Keep out also every word that will aid any child toidentify the Jewish race. Then, when you have thus prepared the soil, you can gointo the universities and colleges and enter upon the double program of pouringcontempt on all the Anglo-Saxon landmarks, at the same time filling the voidwith Jewish revolutionary ideas.

The influence the common people isdriven out of the schools, where common people’s influence can go; but Jewishinfluence is allowed to run rampant in the higher institutions where the commonpeople’s influence cannot go. Secularize the schools, and you can then Judaizethe universities.

This is the "liberalism"which Jewish spokesmen so much applaud. In labor unions, in churches, inuniversities, it has tainted the principles of work, faith and society. Theproof of it is written thickly over all Jewish activities and utterances. It isin exerting these very influences very influences that Jewry convinces itselfthat it is fulfilling its "mission" to the world.

The capitalism attacked is non-Jewishcapitalism; the orthodoxy attacked is Christian orthodoxy; the society attackedis the Anglo-Saxon form of society; all of which by their destruction wouldredound to the glory of Judaism.

The list could be extended – theinfluence of the Jewish idea on Anglo-Saxon sports and pleasure, on theAnglo-Saxon idea of patriotism, on the Anglo-Saxon conception of the learnedprofessions; the influence of the Jewish idea runs down through every departmentof life.

"Well," one very badlydeluded American editor, wrapped up in Jewish advertising contracts, was heardto say, "if the Jews can get away with it, then they have a right to."It is a variant of the "answer" of Jewish origin, which runs thus:"How can a paltry 3 million run the 100 million of the rest of us?Nonsense!"

Yes, let it be agreed; if the Jewishidea is the stronger, if the Jewish ability is the greater, let them conquer;let Anglo-Saxon principles and power go down in ruins before the Tribe of Judah.But first let the two ideas struggle under their own banners; let it be afair struggle.

It is not a fair fight when in themovies, in the schools, in the Judaized churches, in the universities, theAnglo-Saxon idea is kept away from the Anglo-Saxons on the plea that it is"sectarian" or "clannish" or "obsolete" orsomething else, say, reaction.

It is not a fair fight when Jewishideas are offered as Anglo-Saxon ideas, because offered under Anglo-Saxonauspices. Let the heritage of our Anglo-Saxon fathers have free course amongtheir Anglo-Saxon sons, and the Jewish idea can never triumph over it, in theuniversity forum or in the marts of trade. The Jewish idea never triumphs untilfirst the people over whom it triumphs are denied the nurture of their nativeculture.

Judah has begun the struggle. Judahhas made the invasion. Let it come. Let no man fear it. But let every man insistthat the fight be fair. Let college students and leaders of thought know thatthe objective is the regnancy of the ideas and the race that have built all thecivilization we see and that promises all the civilization of the future; letthem also know that the attacking force is Jewish.

That is all that will be necessary. Itis against this that the Jews protest. "You must not identify us,"they say, "You must not use the term ‘Jew’." Why? Because unlessthe Jewish idea can creep in under the assumption of other than Jewish origin,it is doomed. Anglo-Saxon ideas dare proclaim themselves and their origin. Aproper proclamation is all that is necessary today. Compel every invading ideato run up its flag!

___________________________________

"It is for this reason that wemust undermine faith, eradicate from the minds of the Gentiles the veryprinciples of God and Soul, and replace these conceptions by mathematicalcalculations and material desires."

-The Fourth Protocol

3. Victims, Or Persecutors

From the earliest record of theJews’ contact with other nations, no long period of years has ever passedwithout the charge arising that the Jews constitute "a people within apeople, a nation within a nation." When this charge is made today it isvehemently denied by men who pose as the defenders of their people, and thedenial is more or less countenanced by all the Jews of every class. Yet there isnothing more clearly stated in Jewish teaching, nor more clearly indicated inJewish life, than that the charge is true. But whether the truth should beused against the Jews is quite another question.

If the Jews are a nation, theirnationality founded upon the double ground of race and religion, it is certainlyoutside the bounds of reason that they should be asked or expected tode-racialize, de-nationalize and de-religionize themselves; but neither is it tobe expected that they should bitterly denounce those who state the facts. It isonly on a basis of facts that a solution of any problem can come. Where theblame attaches is here: that the evident facts are denial, as if no one but theJews themselves knew that there are such facts.

If the Jews are to be continuously anation, as they teach, and if the condition of "a nation within anation" becomes more and more intolerable, then the solution must comethrough one of two things: a separation of the "nation" from the restof the nations, or an exaltation of the "nation" above the rest of thenations. There is a mass of evidence in Jewish writings that the leaders expectboth of these conditions to come – a separate nation and asuper-nation; indeed the heart of Jewish teaching is that Jewry is aseparate nation now, and on the way to becoming a super-nation. It isonly those appointed to address the Gentiles who deny this: the real rabbinateof Judah does not deny.

Jews Object To "Americanism."

In any investigation of the JewishQuestion, the student is struck over and over again by the fact that what theJews most complain of, they themselves began. They complain of what they callanti-Semitism; but it must be apparent to the dullest mind that there couldnever have been such a thing as anti-Semitism were there not first such a thingas Semitism. Then take the complaint about the Jews having to live in ghettos.The ghetto is a Jewish invention. In the beginning of the invasion of Europeancities, and centuries later of American cities, the Jews always lived bythemselves because they wanted to; because they believed the presence ofGentiles contaminated them. Jewish writers, writing for Jews, freely admit this;but in writing for Gentiles, they refer to the ghetto as an illustration ofGentile cruelty. The idea of contamination originated with the Jews, it is anold oriental survival; it spread by suggestion to the Gentiles. So with thisfact of the separate "nation"; it was the Jews who first recognizedit, first insisted upon it and have always sought to realize that separatenessboth in thought and action.

More, the true and normal type of Jewbelieves that the influence of Americanism, or of any civilized Gentile state,is harmful to Judaism. That is a serious statement and no amount Gentileassertion will be sufficient to confirm it. Indeed, it is such a statement asthe Gentile mind could not have evolved, because the trend of Gentile feeling isall in the opposite direction, namely that Americanization is a good thing forthe Jew. It is from authoritative Jewish sources we learn this fact, that whatwe call civilizing influences are looked upon as being at enmity with Judaism.It is not the Gentile who says that Jewish ideas, as ideas, are incompatiblewith the life of our country; it is the Jew who says so. It is he who inveighsagainst Americanism, not the American who inveighs against Judaism.

Americanism is yet unfinished, Judaismhas been complete for centuries. While no American would think of pointing toany part of the country or to any group as representing the true and final typeof Americanism, the Jews quite unhesitatingly point to parts of the world and tocertain groups as representing the true type of Judaism.

Where is the type to be found whichJewish writers recognize as the true one? The Jew of the ghetto is held up inJewish treatises as the norm of Judaism. A famous rabbi of the synagogue of theSpanish and Portuguese Jews, on Central Park, New York, was Dr. D. de Sola Pool.He is the author of the following words:

·               "Inthe ghetto the observance of Judaism was natural and almost inevitable. Theregimen of Jewish life was the atmosphere that was breathed."

Another famous Jewish rabbi, Dr. M. H.Segal, expresses the view that Jewry in the more modern portions of Europe andAmerica was really kept alive by the infusions of immigrants from Poland andLithuania. Asserting, in agreement with other Jewish leaders, that the Jewishcenter of the world had been in Russia and Poland until just before the 1914war, Dr. Segal says:

·               "Thewar (1914-1918) has destroyed the last traces of the declining Jewish societywhich had dragged out its feeble existence in the semi-medieval ghettos ofPoland and Lithuania. With all their growing feebleness, these communities wereyet the last refuge of Judaism in the Dispersion. In them there still survivedsomething of the old Jewish life, some of the old Jewish institutions, practicesand traditions. These communities also supplied such vitality as they couldafford to the attenuated and atrophied Judaism in the communities of the moremodern states of Europe and America."

The idea is not at all uncommon –that large infusions of "real Jews" from the Old World ghettos aredesirable and necessary in order to keep Judaism alive in countries like theUnited States. Israel Friedlaender whose name is held in honor by the Jews, alsorecognized the service of the ghetto stream to Judaism. In his lecture,"The Problem of Judaism in America," he speaks about the de-Judaizingtendencies of absolute freedom, such as the Jew has always enjoyed in the UnitedStates. This tendency, he says, is corrected in two ways – by anti-Semiticinfluences and "by the large stream of Jewish emigration, on the otherhand, which, proceeding from the lands of oppression to the lands of freedom,carries with it, on or under the surface, the preserving and reviving influencesof the ghetto." This same authority, in an article entitled "TheAmericanization of the Jewish Immigrant," frankly prefers the Jew freshfrom the ghetto to the Jew who has been influenced by American life.

To "Americanize" means, inour ordinary speech, to bring into sympathy with the traditions and institutionsof the United States, but the Jews do not mean only the United States when theysay "America." They mean also South and Central America – where somany revolutions have occurred. There are large numbers of Jews in Argentina,and many are found in other countries. It would probably give a wrong slant tothe fact to say that the Jewish leaders are wholly anti-America, but it is trueto say that they are against the "Americanization" of the Jewishimmigrant stream. That is, that the trend of "Americanism" is sodifferent from the trend of "Judaism" that the two are in conflict.This does not imitate treason toward American nationalism, perhaps, so much asit indicates loyalty toward Jewish nationalism. But the reader must himself bethe judge, on the facts given in this book, as to how far the difference reallygoes and the effect of the struggle between the two ideas. The fact of theantagonism which exists between the two is clear and complete. The Gentiles donot notice that antagonism, but the Jews are always and everywhere keenly awareof it. This throws a very strong light on all the revolutionary programs tobreakup the present control of society, by sowing dissension between so-calledcapital and labor, by cheapening the dignity of government through corruptpolitics, by trivializing the mind of the people through theaters and movies,but it is in the study of Jewish money-making out of war that the clues arefound to most of the great abuses of which the Jews have been guilty. "Warsare the Jews’ harvests," is an ancient saying. Their predilection for thequartermaster’s department has been observed anciently and modernly. Theirinterest being mostly in profits and not in national issues; their traditionalloyalty being to the Jewish nation, rather than to any other nation; it isnatural that they should be found to be the merchants of goods and informationin times of war – that is, the war profiteers and spies. As the unbrokenprogram is traced through the Revolutionary War, through the Civil War, andthrough the Great War [Editor’s Note: The original was published in 1921; thereader is invited to contemplate for himself the events between the Great Wars,especially during and after the war against Hitler, the Power of Jewry gainedthrough wars and the uses Jewry made of the United State as a safe base formilitary and financial operations. The center of Jewry began to shift to theUnited States at the close of the Civil War.], the only change observable is theincreasing power profits of the Jews. Although The number of Jews resident inthe American colonies was small, there were enough to make a mark on theRevolutionary War; and while there was no wholesale legislation against Jews asthere was in the Civil War, there were the same actions against individuals forthe same causes which in 1861-5 obtained more extensively.

Jews And The "Religious Persecution" Cry

No intelligent Jew in the UnitedStates ever was asinine enough to declare that the Jewish Question is areligious question and that investigation of that question in these articlesconstituted "religious persecution." But it is apparently all thatremains for the "Gentile fronts" to shout about. From what can belearned of them they are for the most part men of no religion themselvesand they use the term "religious persecution" as a red rag which theythink will stir people into action. It is curious how the cry of "religiouspersecution" is used to evoke the spirit of persecution against the allegedpersecutors.

Neither directly nor by implication isit held in these articles that the Jewish Question is a religious question. Onthe contrary, supported by the highest Jewish authorities, it is firmly statedthat the Jewish Question is one of race and nationality.

There is no religious persecution ofthe Jews in the United States, unless the agitation of the various humanesocieties for the abolition of "kosher killing" may be considered assuch - the method of slaughtering animals for food which is needlessly cruel.But even this objection can only with difficulty be stretched into interferencewith "the religion of the Jews." The Jewish method of slaughter as nowpracticed is not commanded in the Old Testament but in the Talmud, and is,therefore, not religious in the authoritative sense, but traditional. Moreover,there is positive evidence that modern methods achieve the Jewish purpose (thedisposal of the blood of the carcass) much better than does the Jewish method.This is the only instance where even remotely the religion of the Jews has beentouched.

The fact is that while there is no"religious persecution" of the Jews, there is very much real religiouspersecution by the Jews. That is one of the outstanding characteristicsof organized Jewish life in the United States, its active, unceasing, powerfuland virulent attacks upon any and all forms of Christianity which may chance tocome to public notice. Now and again we hear of outbreaks of sectarian bigotrybetween Catholics and Protestants, but these are not to be compared with thesteady, relentless, alert, anti-Christian activity of the Jewish organizations.There are doctrinal disputes within the Christian Churches, but none thatchallenge the basis of Christianity itself; organized Judaism, however, is notcontent with doctrinal disputation, but enlists its vast commercial andpolitical power against everything that it regards as, in its own words,"Christological manifestations."

No President of the United States hasyet dared to take his inaugural oath on the open pages of the New Testament –the Jews would denounce him. Various governors of American states, having usedthe word "Christian" in their Thanksgiving proclamations, have beenobliged to teach Americanism in our cities because it held that Christianity andgood citizenship were synonymons! No public man in America has ever given publicevidence of his Christian faith without rebuke from the Jews. Not only do theJews disagree with Christian teaching – which is their right and no onequestions it – but they excise it on demand of the Jews. Everything that wouldremind the child in school that he is living in the midst of a Christiancivilization, in a nation declared by its Supreme Court to be founded on theChristian principles, has been ordered out of the public schools on Jewishdemand. In a nation and at a time when a minority of Jews can print every year arecord of the apologies they have extorted from public officials for"having inadvertently used the term ‘Christian’," it is desirablethat this charge of "religious persecution" should be placed where itbelongs.

The Jew glories in religiouspersecution as the American glories in patriotism. Religious prejudice is theJews’ chief expression of their own patriotism. It is the only well-organized,active and successful form of religions prejudice in the country because theyhave succeeded in pulling off the gigantic trick of making not their ownattitude, but any opposition to it, bear the stigma of"prejudice" and "persecution." That is why the Jew usesthese terms so frequently. He wants to label the other fellow first. That is whyany investigation of the Jewish Question is so wickedly advertised asanti-Semitism – the Jew knows the advantage of labelling the other man.

This theme, "religiouspersecution," will not be found anywhere within the whole range of theJewish Question, except on the Jewish side. There is, in the United States, areligious prejudice, but it is strictly Yiddish. If the Christian populationbothered one-hundredth-thousandth part as much about Jewish religion as the Jewsbother about Christian observances, the whole fabric of Talmudic teaching wouldhe consumed in the bright light to which general attention would bring it, thebright light from which it has always been concealed. Sheer analysis in theinterest of mental health would compel the Jewish people to abandon the darknesswhich holds them now. Jewish Talmudism owes its existence today to theindifference with which it is regarded. This is the far opposite extreme of"religious persecution."

Religious prejudice is just asunpleasant to write about as it is to experience in any other way. It is totallycontrary to the genius of the American and the Anglo-Saxon. We have alwaysregarded religion as a matter of conscience. To believe as he will is part ofevery man’s fundamental liberty. Holding these hereditary principles, onechooses to study that active stream of influence in America which is known asthe Jewish stream, and immediately upon doing so, one finds himself classed withthe bigots and torturers of other times.

It is time to show that the cry of"bigot" is raised mostly by bigots. There is a religious prejudice inthis country, there is, indeed, a religious persecution, there is a forcibleshoving aside of the religious liberties of a majority of the people, and thisprejudice and persecution and use of force is Jewish and nothing but Jewish.

A study of history and of contemporaryJewish journalism shows that Jewish prejudice and persecution is a continuousphenomenon wherever the Jews have obtained power, and that in neither action norword has any disability placed upon the Jew equalled the disabilities he hasplaced and still contemplates placing upon non-Jews. There is no Christianchurch that the Jews have not repeatedly attacked.

If there is in the world anyextra-ecclesiastical undertaking by Catholics which has won the undividedapproval of the entire Christian world it is the Passion Play of Oberammergau.Yet in a volume entitled "A Rabbi’s Impressions of the OberammergauPassion Play," Rabbi Joseph Krauskopf, of Philadelphia, has stigmatizedthat noble production as reeking with falsehoods and vicious anti-Semitism. Inthe rabbi’s eyes, of course, it is, for to him the entire Christian traditionis a poisonous lie. The whole fabric of Christian truth, especially as itconcerns the person of Christ is "the hallucinations of emotional men andhysterical women." "Thus," says the rabbi, "was inventedthat cruel story, that has caused more misery, more innocent suffering, than anyother work of fiction in the range of the whole world’s literature."

And thus the simple peasants ofOberammergau, presenting the Catholic faith in reverent pageant, are labelledanti-Semites [Editor’s Note: It will be remembered that, in 1947, nearly 30years after the above criticism was published, the American-controlled AlliedWar Tribunals, tried and punished as "war criminals" all the survivingvillagers who were members of the Oberammergau Festival Players.].

These are not isolated instances. Whenthe Methodist Church put on the great pageant entitled "The Wayfarer,"Rabbi Stephen S. Wise (American Zionist leader when this original was published,and one of the most active political leaders of Zionist Jewry in the UnitedStates; Ed.) played critic and made the solemn and silly statement that had hebeen a South Sea Islander (instead of the itinerant platform performer which heis) his first impulse, after seeing "The Wayfarer," would havebeen to rush out into the street and kill at least three Jews. It says a greatdeal, perhaps, for the channel in which Rabbi Wise's impulses run, but the tensof thousands of Methodists who saw "The Wayfarer" will not beinclined to attribute such a criticism to the spirit of tolerance which RabbiWise so zealously counsels the Christians to observe.

The Episcopal Church also has felt theattack of the Jews. Recently (June, 1921: Ed.) the Jewish Press raised a clamorthat the Episcopal Church was not competent to seek to interfere with it. It isnot religious tolerance in the midst of religious difference, but religiousattack that they preach and practice. The whole record of the Jewish oppositionto Christmas, Easter and other Christian festivals, and their opposition tocertain patriotic songs, shows the venom and directness of that attack. Oneparallel between the Protocols and the real hopes of the Jews is written in thecommon Jewish prophecy that Christianity is doomed to perish. It willperish, to all intents and purposes, by becoming Judaism.

Jewish intolerance today, yesterdayand in every age of history where Jews were able to exert influence or power, isindisputable except among people who do not know the record. Jewish intolerancein the past is a matter of history; for the future it is a matter of Jewishprophecy. One of the strongest causes militating against the fullAmericanization of several millions of Jews in this country is their belief –instilled in them by their religious authorities that they are"chosen," that this land is theirs, that the inhabitants areidolators, that the day is coming when the Jews will be supreme.

How can they otherwise act than inagreement with such declarations? The supercilious attitude adopted by the Jewstoward the stock that made America is merely a foreshadowing of what would bethe complete attitude if power and influence made it possible. Bolshevism, whichbegan with the destruction of the class that contained all the promise of abetter Russia, is an exact parallel for the attitude that is adopted in thiscountry regarding the original stock.

____________________________________________

"Let us all recognize that weJews are a distinct nationality of which every Jew, whatever his country, hisstation, or shade of belief, is necessarily a member."

- Louis D. Brandeis, Justice of theSupreme Court of the United States

4. Are The Jews A Nation?

No Gentile knows how many Jews thereare in the United States. The figures are the exclusive property of the Jewishauthorities. The government of the United States can provide statistics onalmost every matter pertaining to the population of the country, but whenever ithas attempted in a systematic way to get information about the Jews who areconstantly entering the country, and the number now resident here, the Jewishlobby at Washington steps in and stops it. The Jews conceal their strengthbecause Jewish influence at the Capitol has been strong enough to win on allmatters affecting Jewish interests, at all times.

Immigration into the United Statesbecame a business 40 years ago – a strictly Jewish business. There is aperfect organization which overcomes the numerous objections which arise againstthe admission of known revolutionary Jews; European Jews are potentialrevolutionaries. America has not been called "The Jews’ Country" inthe smaller nations of Europe for nothing, and the alarming increase in Jewishimmigration brings the question to public attention again. A national convictionis forming upon the subject, for it is apparent that the strictly Jewishbusiness of getting Jews into the United States moves like an army which, havingdone duty in Europe for the subjugation of that continent, has transferreditself to America. Jewish secret societies in America are the principal aides inthis long stampede to America. They are able to "arrange" the passportwork, they "arrange" avoidance of the health regulations. The laws ofthe country are set aside in open contempt. The Jewish immigrants can come fromanywhere and are coming from anywhere: their first glimpse of life here shows aJewish control as potent and complete as it is in Russia. They see officials ofJewish secret societies override officials of the United States ImmigrationBureau; why should they not behave as if they own the United States? No wonderthat they literally beat down the walls and gates with all the eclat of avictorious invasion. It is an invasion, nothing less, and it is inspired andhelped by influences within the United States. When it is not secret itis thinly cloaked with sentiment "these people are fleeing frompersecution."

After the tide of Jewish invasion intothe United States in the 1880’s became too wide for anyone to ignore thedangers, the censors authorities asked Congress for permission to classifypeople by "race" as well as by "country of birth." Thestrongest opposition was led in Congress by the Jews, principally by SimonGuggenheim and Julian W. Mack. Hearings had to be ordered to know what elementswere composing the population; whether the United States was an Anglo-Saxon,Semitic, Latin nation, or what. The Jewish opposition to the hearings disclosedfour matters very clearly: (1) the Jew is opposed to any restrictive legislationagainst his entrance into a country; (2) the Jew is opposed to any racialclassification of himself after he has entered a country; (3) the Jewishargument to the Gentile authorities is that the Jew represents religion and notrace; (4) the Jew has one view to present to the Gentiles, and another which hecherishes among his own people, on this question of Race. When Americansdisregarded as untenable the argument of "religion, not race," theJewish spokesmen were able to fall back on the fact that their powerfulorganizations did not want certain things and would not have certain things –argument or no argument, commission or no commission. The Jewish lobbyists hadtheir way. There is no enumeration of Jews in the United States. There areclassifications for all other races and nations, but none for the Jews. None ofthe other races made objection, but the Jew is not distinguished at all. What isthe result today? If you ask the government of the United States how manyFrenchmen there are in the country, it can give you the figures. If you ask forthe number of Poles, it is there. If you ask for the number of Africans, it isknown. Down a long list you may make your inquiries, you will find that thegovernment knows. But ask the government of the United States how many Jews arein the country – and it cannot tell; there are no records.

Race Or Religion

What have the Jews themselves to sayabout "race or religion?" The following quotations put the reader inpossession of information regarding the Jew’s own thought of himself as amember of a separate people, quite aside from the consideration of hisreligion.

Leo N. Levi, President of B’naiB’rith, 1900-1904:

·               "Thedistinctive character of the Jew does not arise solely from his religion. It istrue that his race and religion are indissolubly connected, but whatever be thecause of this junction of the race idea with the religion, it is very certainthat the religion alone does not constitute the people. A believer in the Jewishfaith does not by reason of that fact become a Jew. On the other hand, however,a Jew by birth remains a Jew, even though he adjures his religion."

Graetz, the historian of the Jews,whose monumental work is one of the standard authorities, says that the historyof the Jews, even since they lost the Jewish State,

·        "stillpossesses a national character; it is by no means merely a creed or churchhistory."

Moses Hess, one of the historicfigures through whom the whole Jewish Program has flowed down from its ancientsources to its modern agents, wrote a book entitled "Rome andJerusalem" in which he stated the whole matter with clearness and force:

·        "TheJews are something more than mere ‘followers of a religion,’ namely, theyare a race, a brotherhood, a nation." (p. 71).

·        "A Jewbelongs to his race and consequently also to Judaism, in spite of the fact thathe or his ancestors have become apostates." (pp. 97-98).

·        "EveryJew is, whether he likes it or not, solidly muted with the entire nation."(p. 163).

·        "Jewishreligion is, above all, Jewish patriotism." (p. 61).

Louis D. Brandeis, Justice of theSupreme Court of the United States and world leader of the Zionist movement,wrote in his book "Zionism and the American Jews,"-

·        "Despitethe meditations of pundits or the decrees of councils, our own instinct andacts, and those of others, have defined for us the term ‘Jew’."

Rabbi Morris Joseph, sometime of theWest London Synagogue of British Jews, writes in his book "Israel aNation,"-

·        "Israelis assuredly a great nation . . . . Israel is recognized as a nation by thosewho see it; no one could possibly mistake it for a sect. To deny Jewishnationality you must deny the existence of the Jew."

The Jewish barrister, Bertram B.Benas, writes in "Zionism – the National Jewish Movement,"-

·        "TheJewish entity is essentially the entity of a People." Leon Simon, abrilliant and impressive Jewish scholar and writer, makes an important study ofthe question of "religion and nationality," in his volume,"Studies in Jewish Nationalism." He makes out a case for theproposition that the religion of the Jews is Nationalism, and that Nationalismis an integral part of their religion:

·        "TheMessianic Age means for the Jews not merely bile establishment of peace on earthand good will to men, but the universal recognition of the Jew, and hisGod." (p. 14).

·        "'Judaismhas no message of salvation for the individual soul, as Christianity has; allits ideas are bound up with the existence of the Jewish nation." (p. 20).

·        "Theidea that Jews are a religious sect, precisely parallel to Catholics andProtestants, is nonsense." (p. 34).

Arthur D. Lewis, a Jewish writer, inhis "The Jews Nation," also bases nationality on the racial element:

·        "TheJews were originally a nation, and have retained more than most nations one ofthe elements of nationality – namely, the race element; this may be proved, ofcourse, by the commonsense test of their distinguishability. You can more easilysee that a Jew is a Jew than that an Englishman is an Englishman."

The idea that the Jews comprise anation is the most common idea of all – among Jews. Not only a nation with apast, but a nation with a future. More than that – not only a nation, but aSuper-Nation. We can go still further on the authority of Jewish statements: wecan say that the future form of the Jewish Nation will be a kingdom.

Elkan N. Adler says:

·        "Noserious politician today doubts that our people have a political future."

This future political definiteness andpower was in the mind of Moses Hess when he wrote in 1862 – mark the date! –in the preface of his "Rome and Jerusalem," these words:

·        "No nation can beindifferent to the fact that in the coming European struggle for liberty,it may have another people as its friend or foe."

Hess, complaining of the inequalitiesvisited upon the Jews, was saying that what the individual Jew could not getbecause he was a Jew, the Jewish Nation would be able to get because it would bea nation. He learns the Gentile nations to be careful, because in that"coming struggle" there would be another nation in the list, theJewish Nation, which could be the friend or foe of any it chose.

Dr. Israel Friedlaender says:

·        "It is enough for us toknow that the Jews have always felt themselves as a separate race,sharply marked off from the rest of mankind."

As to the problems of the JewishNation, there is plenty of Jewish testimony to the fact that the influence ofAmericanism is harmful to Jewish life; that is they are in antagonism, like twoopposite ideas. And thatZionism is the modern rallying point for Jewish nationalism. The actual beliefsof the most active and influential part of Jewry in America are demonstrated ina work published by the Zionist Organization of America, "Guide toZionism,"

·        "The name of theirnational religion, Judaism, is derived from their national designation. Anun-religious Jew is still a Jew, and he can with difficulty escape hisallegiance only by repudiating the name of Jew." (p. 5).

Jewry nowhere subscribes in thepersons of its greatest teachers and its most authoritative representatives, tothe theory that the Jew is only "a brother of the faith." Often he isnot of the faith at all, belt he is still a Jew. The "religion, notrace" argument exposes the double minds of those political leaders who,instead of straightforwardly meeting the Jewish Question, endeavor to turn allinquiry aside by an impressive confusion of the Gentile mind.

There are two Jewish Programsin the world – one which it is intended the Gentiles should see, and one whichis exclusively for the Jews. In determining which is the real program, it is asafe course to adopt the one that is made to succeed. It is the programsponsored by the so-called Zionists which is succeeding. That is the programwhose sponsors stand for the racial and national separateness of the Jews.

Regardless of what may be said to theGentiles for the purpose of hindering or modifying their action, there is noquestion of what the Jew thinks of himself: he thinks of himself as belonging toa People, united to that people by ties of blood which no amount of credalchange can weaken, heir of that People's past and agent of that People'spolitical future. He belongs to a race; he belongs to a nation. He seeks akingdom to come on this earth, a kingdom which shall be over all kingdoms, withJerusalem the ruling city of the world. That desire of the Jewish nation may befulfilled; and the relationships between Jewish nationalism and the nationalismof the peoples among whom the Jews dwell are pointers to the potential victory.

The Policy Of "Misrepresentation"

To these exposures of the"religion, not race," arguments, the Jews have complained that theyare being misrepresented. It is their usual complaint. They are always being"misrepresented" and "persecuted", except when they arebeing praised for what they are not. If the Jews were fully understood by theGentiles, if the Christian churches, for example, were freed from their delusionthat the Jews are Old Testament people, and if the churches really knew whatTalmudic religion is, the "misrepresentation" would he still bestronger.

The downfall of Russia was prepared bya long and deliberate program of misrepresentation of the Russian people,through the Jewish world press and Jewish diplomatic service. The name of Polandhas been drawn (December, 1920: Ed.) in filth through the press of the UnitedStates under Jewish instigation; vilification of Poland whose sole crime wasthat she wished to save herself from the Jews. But whenever a hand has beenraised to prevent the Jews overrunning the people and secretly securing thecontrol of the major instruments of life, the Jews have raised the cry of"misrepresentation." They never meet the question outright. Falsedenials, pleas for sympathy, and a base campaign for smearing others with theirown crimes, and an unworthy attempt to link others with them in their fall,constitute their whole method of defense [Editor’s Note: Since the publicationof the original, over 37 years ago, other nations have resisted, or tried toresist, Jewish control. Readers will appreciate what has since happened toGermany, and why; and what is now happening to Britain, and why.]. And aconcentration of all the political, economic, legal weapons at their command areflung at the head of the outspoken critic of the Jew who persists in defendinghis right to national existence free from Jewish infiltration, influence andcontrol.

The policy of"misrepresentation" succeeds because there is a feeling stronglyentrenched in Gentiles that somehow the Jews are the "chosen people,"and that it is dangerous to oppose them in anything; whoever opposes the Jew isdamned. "The fear of the Jews" is a very real element in life. It isjust as real among the Jews as among non-Jews. The Jew himself is bound in fearto his people, and he exercises the fear of the curse throughout the sphere ofreligion – "I will curse them that curse thee." It remains to beproved, however, that opposition to the destructive tendencies of Jewishinfluences all along the principal avenues of life is a "cursing" ofthe Jews.

If the Jews were really Old Testamentpeople (which they are not), if they were really conscious of a"mission" for the blessing of all the nations, the very things inwhich they offend would automatically disappear. If the Jew is being"attacked" it is not because he is a Jew but because he is the sourceand life of certain tendencies and influences which, if they are not checked,mean the destruction of moral society. The only real misrepresentation insociety is regarded as the Jews privilege.

Disraeli Portrays The Jews

Benjamin Disraeli, Earl ofBeaconsfield and Prime Minister of Great Britain, was a Jew and gloried in it.He wrote many books, in a number of which he discussed his people in an effortto set them in a proper light. The British Government was not then so Jewish asit has since become, and Disraeli was easily one of the greatest figures in it.In his book, "Coningsby," there appears a Jewish character namedSidonia, in whose personality and through whose utterances, Disraeli sought topresent the Jew as he would like the world to see him.

Yet here is the International Jew,full dress; he is the Protocolist, too, wrapped in mystery, a man whose fingerssweep all the strings of human motive, and who controls the chief of the brutalforces – Money.

If a non-Jew had written a Sidonia, sotruthfully showing the racial history and characteristics of the Jews, he wouldhave been subjected to that terrific pressure which the Jews apply to everytruth teller about themselves.

Disraeli caused his Jewish hero,Sidonia, to remark: "The world is governed by very different personagesfrom what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes," and evenmore illuminating lines by Disraeli which half compel the thought that, afterall, he was writing to warn the world of Jewish ambition for power:

·        "You never observe agreat intellectual movement in Europe in which the Jews do not greatlyparticipate. The first Jesuits were Jews. That mysterious Russian Diplomacywhich so alarms western Europe is organized and principally carried on by Jews.That mighty revolution which is at this moment preparing in Germany, and whichwill be, in fact, a second and greater Reformation, and of which so little isyet known in England, is entirely developing under the auspices of Jews."

Just how the Jews work to break downthe established order of things, by means of ideas, as the Protocolsclaim, is shown in a conversation of Sidonia:

·        "The Tories lose animportant election at a critical moment; ’tis the Jews come forward to voteagainst them. The Church is alarmed at the scheme of a latitudinarianuniversity, and learns with relief that funds are not forthcoming for itsestablishment; a Jew immediately advances and endows it."

If these words had been written by anon-Jew, the cry of "anti-Semitism" would ring through the land. YetSidonia adds: "And every generation they (the Jews) must become morepowerful and dangerous to the society that is hostile to them."

"Latitudinarianism" is thedoctrine of the Protocols in a word. It is the break-up by means of a welter ofso-called "liberal" ideas which construct nothing themselves, but havethe power to destroy the established order.

Several generations have passed sinceDisraeli’s words were written. The Jew still regards every form of non-Jewishsociety as hostile to him. They have become more powerful and moredangerous. Those who would measure the danger – look around!

The Jew says that the Protocols areinventions. Is Benjamin Disraeli an invention? Was this Jewish Prime Minister ofGreat Britain misrepresenting his people? He showed that in Russia, the verycountry where the Jews of his time complained they were least free, the Jewswere in control. He showed that the Jews knew the technique of revolution,foretelling in his book the revolution that shortly broke out in Germany. Howdid he foreknow it? Because that revolution was developing under the auspices ofJews, and, though it was then true that "so little is yet known inEngland," Disraeli the Jew knew it, and knew it to be Jewish in origin anddevelopment and purpose. One point is clear; Disraeli told the truth. Hepresented his people before the world with correctness. He described Jewishpower, Jewish purpose and Jewish method with a certainty of touch that betokensmore than knowledge – he shows racial sympathy and understanding. Why did hedo it? Disraeli the flamboyant, most oriental of courtiers and suave ofpoliticians, with a keen financial ability. Was it that typically racialboastfulness, that dangerous, aggressive conceit in which the Jew gives up mostof his secrets? No matter; he is the one man who told the truth about the Jewswithout being accused of "misrepresenting" the Jews.

_____________________________________________________________

"We will so wear out and exhaustthe Gentiles by all this that they will be compelled to offer us aninternational authority, which by its position will enable us to absorb withoutdisturbance all the governmental forces of the world and thus form asuper-government.

"We must so direct the educationof Gentile society that its hand will drop in the weakness of discouragement inthe face of any undertaking where initiative is needed."

-The Fifth Protocol

5. The Jewish Political Program

Theodor HerzI, one of the greatest ofthe Jews and founder of modern Zionism, was perhaps the farthest-seeing publicexponent of the philosophy of Jewish existence that modern generations haveknown. He was never in doubt of the existence of the Jewish nation. Heproclaimed its existence on every occasion. He said, "We are a people– One people."

He clearly saw that what he called theJewish Question was political. In his introduction to "The Jewish State"he says:

·        "I believe that Iunderstand anti-Semitism, which is really a highly complex movement. I considerit from a Jewish standpoint, yet without fear or hatred. I believe that I cansee what elements there are in it of vulgar sport, of common trade jealousy, ofinherited prejudice, of religious intolerance and also of pretended defense. Ithink the Jewish Question is no more a social than a religious one,notwithstanding that it sometimes takes these and other forms. It is anational question, which can only be solved by making it a political worldquestion to be discussed and controlled by the civilized nations of theworld in council."

Not only did Herzl declare that theJews, formed a nation, but in relating the action of this Jewish nation to theworld Herzl wrote:

·        "When we sink, webecome a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of therevolutionary party; when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of thepurse."

This view, which appears to be thetrue view in that it is the view which has been longest sustained in Jewishthought, is brought out also by Lord Eustace Percy, and re-published, apparentlywith approval, by the Canadian "Jewish Chronicle."- It willrepay careful reading.

·        "Liberalism andNationalism, with a flourish of trumpets, threw open the doors of the ghetto andoffered equal citizenship to the Jew. The Jew passed out into the Western World,saw the power and the glory of it, used it and enjoyed it, laid his hand indeedupon the nerve centers of its civilization, guided, directed and exploited it,and then – refused the offer.... Moreover - and this is a remarkable thing -the Europe of nationalism and liberalism, of scientific government anddemocratic equality is more intolerable to him than the old oppressions andpersecutions of despotism...

·        "In a world ofcompletely organized territorial sovereignties he (the Jew) has only twopossible cities of refuge: he must either pull down the pillars of the wholenational state system or he must create a territorial sovereignty of his own. Inthis perhaps lies the explanation both of Jewish Bolshevism and of Zionism, forat this moment Eastern Jewry seems to hover uncertainly between the two. InEastern Europe Bolshevism and Zionism often seem to grow side by side, just asJewish influence moulded Republican and Socialist thought throughout thenineteenth century, down to the Young Turk revolution in Constantinople hardlymore than a decade ago – not because the Jews cares for the positive side ofradical philosophy, not because he desires to be a partaker in Gentilenationalism or Gentile democracy, but because no existing Gentile system ofgovernment is ever anything but distasteful to him."

All that is true, and Jewish thinkersof the more fearless type always recognize it as true. The Jew is against theGentile scheme of things. He is, when he gives his tendencies full sway, aRepublican as against the monarchy, a Socialist as against the republic, and aBolshevist as against socialism.

What are the causes of this disruptiveactivity? First, his essential lack of democracy. Jewish nature is autocratic.Democracy is all right for the rest of the world, but the Jew wherever he isfound forms an aristocracy of one sort or another. Democracy is merely a tool ofa word which Jewish agitators use to raise themselves to the ordinary level inplaces where they are oppressed below it; but having reached the common levelthey immediately make efforts for special privileges, as being entitled to them– a process which the late Peace Conference (Versailles: Ed.) will remain themost startling example. The Jews today are the only people whose special andextraordinary privileges are written into the world’s Treaty of Peace.(Original published in July, 1920: refer also to the present United Nations:Editor).

In all the explanations of anti-Jewishfeeling which modern Jewish spokesmen make, these three alleged causes arecommonly given – these three and no more: religious prejudice, jealousy,social antipathy. Whether the Jew knows it or not, every Gentile knows that onhis side of the Jewish Question no religious prejudice exists. Economic jealousymay exist, at least to this extent, that his uniform success has exposed the Jewto much scrutiny. The finances of the world are in control of Jews; theirdecisions and their devices are themselves our economic law. Economic jealousymay explain some of the anti-Jewish feeling; it cannot account for the presenceof the Jewish Question except as the hidden causes of Jewish financial successmay become a minor element of the larger problem. And as for social antipathythere are many more undesirable Gentiles in the world than there are undesirableJews, for the simple reason that there are many more Gentiles.

None of the Jewish spokesmen mentionthe political cause, or if they come within suggestive distance of it,they limit it and localize it. The political element inheres in the fact thatthe Jews form a nation in the midst of the nations. It is not the fact that theJews remain a nation in the midst of the nations; it is the USE made of thatinescapable status, which the world has found to be reprehensible. The nationshave tried to reduce the Jews to unity with themselves, but destiny seems tohave marked them out to continuous nationhood. Both the Jews and the World willhave to accept that fact. The Jewish world program, and the political basis ofanti-Jewish feeling which that program creates, is exposed by Jewishcosmopolitanism with regard to the world, and by Jewish nationalistic integritywith regard to themselves.

Jewish Nationalism And The Protocols

No one now pretends to deny, except afew spokesmen who really do not rule the thought of the Jews but are set forthfor the sole benefit of influencing Gentile thought, that the socially andeconomically disruptive elements abroad in the world today are not only mannedbut also monied by Jewish interests.

For a long time this fact was held insuspense owing to the vigorous denial of the Jews and the lack of information onthe part of those agencies of publicity, to which the public looked for itsinformation. But now the facts are coming forth. Herzl’s words are beingproved to be true – "when we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat,the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party." These words werefirst published in English in 1896!

Just now these tendencies are workingin two directions, one for the tearing down of the Gentile states all over theworld, the other for the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine. Thelatter project engaged the attention of the whole world. The Zionists make agreat deal of noise about Palestine, but it can scarcely be designated as morethan an unusually ambitious colonization scheme. The Jewish "home"idea so sedulously cultivated is a very useful smokescreen for the confiscationof the immeasurable sources of mineral and oil wealth. It is also serving as avery useful public screen for the carrying on of secret activities.

International Jews, the controllers ofthe world’s governmental and financial power, may meet anywhere, at any time,in war or peace time, and by giving out that they are only considering the waysand means of opening up Palestine to the Jews, they easily escape the suspicionof being together on any other business.

Though Jewish nationalism exists, itsenshrinement in a state to be set up in Palestine is not the project that isengaging the whole Jewish nation. The Jews will not move into Palestine justyet; they will not move in at all merely because of the Zionist movement. Quiteanother motive will be the cause of the exodus out of the Gentile nations, whenthe time for that exodus fully comes.

The world has long suspected at first only a few then the secretdepartments of the governments, next the intellectuals among the people, nowmore and more the common people themselves – that not only are the Jews anation distinct from all other nations and mysteriously unable to sink theirnationality by any means they or the world may adopt to this end, but that theyalso constitute a STATE; that they are nationally conscious, not only, butconsciously united for a common defense for a common purpose. Revert toHerzl’s definition of the Jewish nation as held together by a common enemy andthen reflect that this common enemy is the Gentile world! Does this people whichknows itself to be a nation remain loosely unorganized in the face ofthat fact? It would hardly be like Jewish astuteness in other fields! Theinterest of the Protocols is their bearing on the questions: Have the Jews anorganized world system? What is its policy? How is it being worked?

These questions all receive fullattention in the Protocols. Whosoever was the mind that conceived them possesseda knowledge of human nature, of history and of statecraft which is dazzling inits brilliant completeness, and terrible in the objects to which it turns itspowers. If, indeed, one mind alone conceived them. It is too terribly real forfiction, too well sustained for speculation too deep in its knowledge of thesecret springs of life for forgery. Jewish attacks upon it thus far make much ofthe fact that it came out of Russia. That is hardly true. It came by way ofRussia.

The internal evidence makes it clearthat the Protocols were not written by a Russian, nor originally in the Russianlanguage, nor under the influence of Russian conditions, but they found theirway to Russia and were first published there about 1905 by a Professor Nilus,who attempted to interpret the Protocols by events then going forward in Russia.

They have been found by diplomaticofficers in manuscript in all parts of the world. Wherever Jewish power is ableto do so, it has suppressed them, sometimes under the extreme penalty.

Their persistence is a fact whichchallenges the mind. Sheer lies do not live long, their power soon dies. TheProtocols are more alive than ever. They have penetrated higher places than everbefore. They have compelled a more serious attitude to them than ever before.The Protocols are a World Program – there is no doubt anywhere of that –whose program is stated within the articles themselves. But as for outerconfirmation, which would be the more valuable – a signature, or sixsignatures, or twenty signatures, or a 50-year unbroken line of effortfulfilling that program?

The point of interest for this andother countries is not that a "criminal or a madman" conceived such aprogram, but that, when conceived, this program found means of getting itselffulfilled in its most important particulars. The document is comparativelyunimportant; the conditions to which it calls attention are of a very highdegree of importance.

________________________________________________

"When we become rulers we shallregard as undesirable the existence of any religion except our own, proclaimingOne God with Whom our fate is tied as The Chosen People, and by Whom our fatehas been made one with the fate of the world. For this reason we must destroyall other religions. If thereby should emerge contemporary atheists, then, as atransition step, this will not interfere with our aims."

- The Fourteenth Protocol

"A world coalition of Gentilecould cope with us temporarily, but we are assured against this by roots ofdissension among them so deep that they cannot be torn out. We have createdantagonism between the personal and national interests of the Gentiles byarousing religious and race hatreds which we have nourished in their hearts fortwenty centuries."

- The Fifth Protocol

6. An Introduction To The "Jewish Protocols"

The documents most frequentlymentioned by those who are interested in the theory of Jewish World Power ratherthan in the actual operation of that power in the world today, are those 24documents known as "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion."

The Protocols have attracted muchattention in Europe, having been the center of an important storm of opinion inEngland, but discussion of them in the United States has been limited.

Who it was that first entitled thesedocuments with the name of the "Elders of Zion" is not known. It wouldbe possible without serious mutilation of the documents to remove all hint ofJewish authorship, and yet retain all the main points of the most comprehensiveprogram for world subjugation that has ever come to public knowledge.

Yet to eliminate all hint of Jewishauthorship would be to bring out a number of contradictions which do not existin the Protocols in their present form. The purpose of the plan revealed in theProtocols is to undermine all authority in order that a new authority in theform of an autocracy may be set up. Such a plan would not emanate from a rulingclass which already possessed authority, although it might emanate fromanarchists. But anarchists do not avow autocracy as the ultimate condition theyseek. The authors might be conceived as a company of French Subversives such asexisted at the time of the French Revolution and had the infamous Duc d’Orleans as their leader, but this would involve a contradiction between the factthat those Subversives have passed away, and the fact that the program announcedin these Protocols is being steadily carried out, not only in France, butthroughout Europe, and very noticeably in the United States.

In their present form which bearsevidence of being their original form, there is no contradiction. The allegationof Jewish authorship seems essential to the consistency of the plan.

If these documents were the forgerieswhich Jewish apologists claim them to be, the forgers would probably have takenpains to make Jewish authorship so clear that their anti-Semitic purpose couldeasily have been detected. But only twice is the term "Jew" used inthem. After one has read further than the average reader usually cares to gointo such matters, one comes upon the plans for the establishment of the WorldAutocrat, and only then is it made clear of what lineage he is to be.

But all through the documents there isleft no doubt as to the people against whom the plan is aimed. It is not aimedagainst aristocracy as such. It is not aimed against capital as such. Verydefinite provisions are made for the enlistment of aristocracy, capital andgovernment for the execution of the plan. It is aimed against the people of theworld who are called "Gentiles." It is the frequent mention of"Gentiles" that really decides the purpose of the documents. Most ofthe destructive type of "liberal" plans aim at the enlistment of thepeople as helpers; this plan aims at the degeneration of the people in orderthat they may be reduced to confusion of mind and thus manipulated. Popularmovements of a "liberal" kind are to be encouraged, all the disruptivephilosophies in religion, economics, politics and domestic life are to be sownand watered, for the purpose of so disintegrating social solidarity and adefinite plan, herein set forth, may be put through without notice, and thepeople then moulded to it when the fallacy of these philosophies is shown.

The formula of speech is not, "WeJews will do this," but "The Gentiles will be made to think and dothese things." With the exception of a few instances in the closingProtocols, the only distinctive racial terms used is "Gentiles."

Racial Divergencies

To illustrate: the first indication ofthis kind comes in the First Protocol in this way:

·        "The great qualities ofthe people – honesty and frankness – are essentially vices in polities,because they dethrone more surely and more certainly than does the strongestenemy. These qualities are attributes of Gentile rule; we certainly must not beguided by them."

Again:

·        "On the ruins of thehereditary aristocracy of the Gentiles we have set up the aristocracy of oureducated class, and over all the aristocracy of money. We have established thebasis of this new aristocracy on the basis of riches, which we control, and onthe science guided by our wise men."

Again:

·        "We will force upwages, which, however, will be of no benefit to workers, for we at the same timewill cause a rise in prices of prime necessities, pretending that this is due tothe decline of agriculture and of cattle raising. We will also artfully anddeeply undermine the sources of production by instilling in the workmen ideas ofanarchy, and encourage them in the use of alcohol, at the same time takingmeasures to drive all the intellectual forces of the Gentiles from theland."

 (A forger with anti-Semitic malice might have written this anytime within the last five years, but these words were in print as early as 1905,a copy having been in the British Museum since 1906, and they were circulated inRussia a number of years prior.) The above point continues:

·        "That the truesituation shall not be noticed by the Gentiles prematurely, we will mask it by apretended effort to serve the working classes and promote great economicprinciples, for which an active propaganda will be carried on through oureconomic theories."

These quotations will illustrate thestyle of the Protocols in making references to the parties involved. It is"we" for the writers, and "Gentiles" for those who are beingwritten about. This is brought out very clearly in the Fourteenth Protocol:

·        "In this divergencebetween the Gentiles and ourselves in ability to think and reason is to be seenclearly the seal of our election as the chosen people, as higher human beings,in contrast with the Gentiles who have merely instinctive and animal minds. Theyobserve, but they do not foresee, and they invent nothing (except perhapsmaterial things). It is clear from this that nature herself predestined us torule and guide the world."

This, of course, has been the Jewishmethod of dividing humanity from the earliest times. The world was only Jew andGentile; all that was not Jew was Gentile. The use of the word Jew may beillustrated by this passage from the Eighth section:

·        "For the time being,until it will be safe to give responsible government positions to our brotherJews, we shall entrust them to people whose past and whose characters are suchthat there is an abyss between them and the people."

This is the practice known as using"Gentile fronts" which is extensively practiced in the financial worldtoday in order to cover up the evidences of Jewish control. How much progresshas been made since these words were written is indicated by the partyconvention at San Francisco when the name of Judge Brandeis was proposed forPresident. It is reasonably to be expected that the public mind will be mademore and more familiar with the idea of Jewish occupancy – which will bereally a short step from the present degree of influence which the Jews exercise– of the highest office in the government. There is no function of theAmerican Presidency in which the Jews have not already secretly assisted in avery important degree. Actual occupancy of the office is not necessary toenhance their power, but to promote certain things which parallel very closelythe plans outlined in the Protocols.

Another point which the reader of theProtocols will notice is that the tone of exhortation is entirely absent fromthese documents. They are not propaganda. They are not efforts to stimulate theambitions or activity of those to whom they are addressed. They are as cool as alegal paper and as matter-of-fact as a table of statistics. There is none of the"Let us rise, my brothers" stuff about them. There is no "Downwith the Gentiles" hysteria. These Protocols, if indeed they were made byJews and confined to Jews, or if they do contain principles of a Jewish WorldProgram, were certainly not intended for the firebrands but for the carefullyprepared and tested initiates of the higher groups.

Problem Of Origin

Jewish apologists have asked, "Isit conceivable that if there were such a world program on the part of the Jews,would they reduce it to writing and publish it?" But there is no evidencethat these Protocols were ever uttered otherwise than in spoken words bythose who put them forth. The Protocols as we have them are apparently the notesof lectures which were made by someone who heard them. Some of them are lengthy;some of them are brief. The assertion which has always been made in connectionwith the Protocols since they have become known is that they are the notes oflectures delivered to Jewish students somewhere in France or Switzerland. Theattempt to make them appear to be of Russian origin is absolutely forestalled bythe point of view, the references to the times and certain grammaticalindications. The tone certainly fits the supposition that they were originallylectures given to students, for their purpose is clearly not to get a programaccepted but to give information concerning a program which isrepresented as being already in process of fulfillment. There is noinvitation to join forces or to offer opinions. Indeed it is specificallyannounced that neither discussion nor opinions are desired. ("Whilepreaching liberalism to the Gentiles we shall hold our own people and our ownagents in unquestioning obedience." "The scheme of administration mustemanate from a single brain . . . . Therefore, we may know the plan ofaction, but we must not discuss it, lest we destroy its unique character. . . . The inspired work of our leader therefore must not be thrown before acrowd to be torn to pieces, or even before a limited group.")

Moreover, taking the Protocols attheir face value, it is evident that the program outlined in these lectures wasnot a new one at the time the lectures were given. There is no evidence of itsbeing of recent arrangement. There is almost the tone of a tradition, or areligion, in it all, as if it had been handed down from generation to generationthrough the medium of specially trusted and initiated men. There is no note ofnew discovery or fresh enthusiasm in it, but the certitude and calmness of factslong known and policies long confirmed by experiment.

The point of age of the program istouched upon at least twice in the Protocols themselves. In the First Protocolthis paragraph appears:

·        "Already in ancienttimes we were the first to shout the words, ‘Liberty, Equality,Fraternity,’ among the people. These words have been repeated many times sinceby unconscious poll-parrots, flocking from all sides to this bait, with whichthey have ruined the prosperity of the world and true personal freedom.... Thepresumably clever and intelligent Gentiles did not understand the symbolism ofthe uttered words; did not observe their contradiction in meaning; did notnotice that in nature there is no equality...."

The other reference to the programfinality is found in the Thirteenth Protocol:

·        "Questions of policyhowever, are permitted to no one except those who have originated the policy andhave directed it for many centuries."

Can this be a reference to a secretJewish Sanhedrin, self-perpetuating within a certain Jewish caste fromgeneration to generation? Again, it must be said that the originators anddirectors here referred to cannot be at present any ruling caste, for all thatthe program contemplates is directly opposed to the interests of such a caste.It cannot refer to any national aristocratic group, like the Junkers of Germany,for the methods which are proposed are the very ones which would renderpowerless such a group. It cannot refer to any but a people who have no opengovernment who have everything to gain and nothing to lose, and who can keepthemselves intact amid a crumbling world. There is only one group that answersthat description.

Gentile Stupidity

The criticisms which these Protocolspass upon the Gentiles for their stupidity are just. It is impossible todisagree with a single item in the Protocol s description of Gentile mentalityand venality. Even the most astute of the Gentile thinkers have been fooled intoreceiving as the motions of progress what has only been insinuated into thecommon human mind by the most insidious systems of propaganda. It is true thathere and there a thinker has arisen to say that science so-called was notscience at all. It is true that here and there a thinker has arisen to say thatthe so-called economic laws both of conservatives and radicals were not laws atall, but artificial inventions. It is true that occasionally a keen observer hasasserted that the recent debauch of luxury and extravagance was not due to thenatural impulses of the people at all, but was systematically stimulated,foisted upon them by design. It is true that a few have discerned that more thanhalf of what passes for "public opinion" is merely hired applause andbooing and has never impressed the public mind.

But even with these clues here andthere, for the most part disregarded, there has never been enough continuity andcollaboration between those who were awake, to follow all the clues to theirsource. The chief explanation of the hold which the Protocols have had on manyof the leading statesmen of the world for several decades is that they explainwhence all the false influences come and what their purpose is. It is now timefor the people to know. Whether the Protocols are judged as proving anythingconcerning the Jews or not, they constitute an education in the way the massesare turned about like sheep by influences which they do not understand. It iscertain that once the principles of the Protocols are known widely andunderstood by the people, the criticism which they now rightly make of theGentile mind will no longer hold good.

Divide And Rule

Is there likelihood of the program ofthe Protocols being carried through to success? The program is successfulalready. In many of its most important phases it is a reality. Bill this neednot cause alarm, for the chief weapon to be used against such a program, both inits completed and uncompleted parts, is clear publicity. Let the people know.Arousing the people, alarming the people, appealing to the passions of thepeople is the method of the plan outlined in the Protocols. The antidote ismerely ENLIGHTENING the people.

The Protocols are found upon analysisto contain four main divisions. These are not marked in the structure of thedocuments but in the thought. There is a fifth, if the object of it all isincluded, but this object is assumed throughout the Protocols, being only hereand there defined in terms. And the four main divisions are great trunks fromwhich there are numerous branches.

There is first what is alleged to bethe Jewish conception of human nature, by which is meant Gentile nature.Secondly, there is the account of what has already been accomplished in therealization of the program – things already done. Thirdly, there is a completeinstruction in the methods to be used to get the program still furtherfulfilled. Fourth, the Protocols contain in detail some of the achievementswhich, at the time these words were uttered, were yet to be made. Some of thesedesired things have been achieved in the meantime, for it should be borne inmind that between 1905 and the present time there have been set in motion manypowerful influences to attain certain ends. The achievement to be made was thebreak up of Gentile solidarity and strength, expedited, of course, by the greatwars in Europe. The method expounded is one of disintegration. Break up thepeople into parties and sects. Sow abroad the most promising and utopian ofideas and you will do two things; you will always find a group to cling to eachidea you throw out; and you will find this partisanship dividing and estrangingthe various groups. The authors of the Protocols show in detail how this is tobe done. Not one idea, but a mass of ideas are to be thrown out, and there is tobe no unity among them. The purpose is not to get the people thinking one thing,but to think so diversely about so many different things that there will be nounity among them. The result of this will be vast disunity, vast unrest – andthat is the result aimed at. When once the solidarity of Gentile society isbroken up – and the name "Gentile society" is perfectly correct, forhuman society is overwhelmingly Gentile – then this solid wedge of anotherilea which is not at all affected by the prevailing confusion can make its wayunsuspected to the place of control. It is well enough known that a body of 20trained police or soldiers can accomplish more than a disordered mob of athousand persons. So the minority initiated into the plan can do more with anation or a world broken into a thousand antagonistic parties, than any of theparties could do. "Divide and rule" is the motto of the Protocols.

Take for illustration these passages[Editor’s Note: These extracts illuminate the deceptions of the "worldgovernments" such as the League of Nations, and United Nations, wheresmooth ideas and hard facts prove opposites.]: This from the First Protocol:

·        "Political freedom isan idea, not a fact. It is necessary to know how to apply thisidea when there is need of a clever bait to gain the support of the people forone’s party, if such a party has undertaken to defeat another party already inpower. This task is made easier if the opponent has himself been infected byprinciples of freedom or so-called liberalism, and for the sake of the idea willyield some of his power."

Consider this from the Fifth Protocol:

·        "To obtain control overpublic opinion, it is first necessary to confuse it by the expression fromvarious sides of so many conflicting opinions . . . . this is the first secret.The second secret consists in so increasing and intensifying the shortcomings ofthe people in their habits, passions and mode of living that no one will be ableto collect himself in the chaos, and, consequently, people will lose all theirmutual understanding. This measure will serve us also in breeding disagreementin all parties, in disintegrating all those collective forces which are stillunwilling to submit to us and in discouraging all personal initiative which canin any way interfere with our undertaking."

And this from the Thirteenth Protocol:

·        ". . . . and you mayalso notice that we seek approval, not for our acts, but for our words utteredin regard to one or another question. We always announce publicly that we areguided in all our measures by the hope and the conviction that we are servingthe general good."

Protocols Claim Partial Fulfillment

Besides the things they look forwardto doing, the Protocols announce the things they are doing and have done.Looking about the world today it is possible to see both the establishedconditions and the strong tendencies to which the Protocols allude – theterrible completeness of the World Plan which they disclose. A few generalquotations will serve to illustrate the element of present achievement in theassertions of these documents, and in order that the point may be made clear tothe reader the key words will be emphasized.

Take this from Protocol Nine:

• "In reality there are no obstacles before us. Our super-government has such an extra-legal status that it may be called the energetic and strong word – dictatorship. I can conscientiously say that, at the present time, we are the lawmakers. We create courts and jurisprudence. We rule with a strong will because we hold in our hands the remains of a once strong party, now subjugated by us."

And this from the Eighth Protocol:

• "We will surround our government with a whole world of economists. It is for this reason that the science of economics is the chief subject of instruction taught by the Jews. We shall be surrounded by a whole galaxy of bankers, industrialists, capitalists, and especially by millionaires because, actually, everything will be decided by an appeal to figures."

These are strong claims, but not toostrong for the facts that can be marshalled to illustrate them. They are,however, but an introduction to further claims that are made and equallyparalleled by the facts. All through the Protocols, as in this quotation fromthe Eighth, the pre-eminence of the Jews in teaching political economy isinsisted upon, and the facts bear that out. They are the chief authors of thosevagaries which lead the mob after economic impossibilities, and they are alsothe chief teachers of political economy in our universities, the chief authorsof those popular textbooks in the subject, which hold the conservative classesto the fiction that economic theories are economic laws. The idea,the theory, as instruments of social disintegration are common to boththe university Jew and the Bolshevic Jew. When all this is shown in detail,public opinion upon the importance of academic and radical economics may undergoa change.

And, as claimed in the quotation justgiven from the Ninth Protocol, the Jewish world power does today constitute asuper-government. It is the Protocol’s own word, and none is more fitting. Nonation can get all that it wants, but the Jewish World Power can get all that itwants, even though its demands exceed Gentile equality. "We are thelawmakers," say the Protocols, and Jewish influences have been lawmakers ina greater degree than any but the specialists realize. In the past decadesJewish international rule has quite dominated the world. Wherever Jewishtendencies are permitted to work unhindered, the result is not"Americanization," nor "Anglicization" nor any otherdistinctive nationalism, but a strong and ruling reversion back to essential"Judaization.,"

Conquest Of Religion And Press

This from the Seventeenth Protocolwill be of considerable interest, perhaps, to those clergymen who are laboringwith Jewish rabbis to bring about some kind of religious union:

• "We have taken good care long ago to discredit the Gentile clergy and thereby to destroy their mission, which at present might hamper us considerably. Their influence over the people diminishes daily. Freedom of conscience has been proclaimed everywhere. Consequently it is only a question of time when the complete crash of the Christian religion will occur."

A curious paragraph in this Protocolclaims for the Jewish race a particular skill in the art of insult:

• "Our contemporary Press will expose governmental and religions affairs and the incapacity of the Gentiles, always using expressions so derogatory as to approach insult, the faculty of employment which is so well known to our race."

And this from the Fifteenth Protocol:

• "Under our influence the execution of the laws of the Gentiles is reduced to a minimum. Respect for the law is undermined by the liberal interpretation we have introduced in this sphere. The courts decide as we dictate, even in the most important cases in which are involved fundamental principles or political issues, viewing them in the light in which we present them to the Gentile administration through agents with whom we have apparently nothing in common, through newspaper opinion and other avenues."

Claims of control of the Press arenumerous, here are emphatic statements from the Fourteenth Protocol:

• "In countries called advanced, we have created a senseless, filthy and disgusting literature. For a short time after our entrance into power we shall encourage its existence so that it may show in greater relief the contrast between it and the written and spoken announcements which will emanate from us."

And in the Twelfth Protocol:

• "We have attained this (Press Control) at the present time to the extent that all news is received through several agencies in which it is centralized from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be to all intents and purposes our oven institutions and will publish only that which we permit."

This from the Seventh Protocol bearson the same subject:

• "We must force the Gentile governments to adopt measures which will promote over broadly conceived plan, already approaching its triumphant goal, by bringing to bear the pressure of stimulated public opinion, which has been organized by us with the help of the so-called ‘great power’ of the Press. With a few exceptions not worth considering, it is already in our hands."

To resume the Twelfth Protocol:

• "If we have already managed to dominate the mind of Gentile society to such a point that almost all see world affairs through the colored lenses of the spectacles which we place before their eyes, and if now there is not one government with barriers erected against our access to that which by Gentile stupidity is called state secrets, what then will it be when we are the recognized masters of the world in the person of our universal ruler?"

The Jewish nation is the onlynation that possesses the secrets of the rest. The fact that they can getwhatever they want when they want it is the important point – as many a secretpaper could testify if it could talk, and as many a custodian of secret paperscould tell if he would. The real secret diplomacy of the world is that whichhands over the world’s so-called secrets to a few men who are members of onerace; there is no government in the world so completely at their service as ourown at present.

Note On The Dispersal

The Protocols do not regard thedispersal of the Jews abroad upon the face of the earth as a calamity, but as aprovidential arrangement by which the World Plan can be the more easilyexecuted, as see these words of the Eleventh Protocol:

·        "God gave us, HisChosen People, as a blessing, the dispersal, and this which has appeared toall to be our weakness has been our whole strength. It has nowbrought us to the threshold of universal rule."

The claims to accomplishment which areput forth in the Ninth Protocol would be too massive for words were they not toomassive for concrete realization, but there is a point where the word and theactuality meet and tally:

·        "In order not todestroy prematurely the Gentile institutions, we have laid our efficienthands on them, and rasped the springs of their mechanism. They were formerly instrict and just order, but we have replaced them with a liberaldisorganized and arbitrary administration. We have tampered withjurisprudence, the franchise, the press, freedom of the person, and, mostimportant of all, education and culture, the cornerstone of free existence.

·        "We have misled,stupefied and demoralized the youth of the Gentiles by means of education inprinciples and theories patently false to us, but which we have inspired.Above existing laws, without actual change but by distorting them throughcontradictory interpretations, we have created something stupendous inthe way of results."

Everyone knows that, in spite of thefact that the air was never as full of theories of liberty and wild declarationsof "rights," there has been a steady curtailment of "personalfreedom." Instead of being socialized, the people, under a cover ofsocialistic phrases, are being brought under an unaccustomed bondage to thestate; laws of every kind are hedging upon the harmless liberties of the people.A steady tendency toward systematization, every phase of the tendency leasedupon some very learnedly stated "principle," has set in, and curiouslyenough, when the investigator pursues his way to the authoritative center ofthese movements for the regulation of the people’s life, he finds Jews inpower!

Splitting Society By "Ideas"

The method by which the Protocols workfor the breakdown of society is evident. An understanding of the method isnecessary if one is to find the meaning of the currents and cross-currents whichmake so hopeless a hodge-podge of the present times. People who are confused anddiscouraged by the various voices and discordant theories of today, each seemingto be plausible and promising, may find a clear clue to the value of the voicesand the meaning of the theories if they understand that their confusionand discouragement comprise the very objective which is sought. Theuncertainty, hesitation, hopelessness, fear: the eagerness with which everypromising plan and offered solution is grasped – these are the very reactionswhich the program outlined in the Protocols aims to produce. The condition isproof of the efficacy of the program.

It is a method that takes time and theProtocols declare that it has taken time, indeed centuries. Students ofthe matter find the identical program of the Protocols, announced and operatedby the Jewish race, from the first century onward.

It has taken 1900 years to bringEurope to its present degree of subjugation – violent subjugation in somecountries, political subjugation in some, economic subjugation in all – but inAmerica the same program, with almost the same degree of success, has onlyrequired about 50 years! The center of Jewish power, the principal sponsors ofthe Jewish program, are resident in America, and the leverage which was used atthe Peace Conference [Editor’s Note: The Versailles Conference is referred toin the original text, following World War I. Jewish influence has been furtherdemonstrated at the United Nations, under American protection. since World War2.] to fasten Jewish power more securely upon Europe, was American leverageexercised at the behest of the strong Jewish pressure which was brought from theUnited States for that purpose. And these activities did not end with the PeaceConference.

The whole method of theProtocols may be described in one word Disintegration. The undoing ofwhat has been done, the creation of a long and hopeless interim in whichattempts at reconstruction shall be baffled, and the gradual wearing down ofpublic opinion and public confidence, until those who stand outside the createdchaos shall insert their strong, calm hand to seize control – that is thewhole method of procedure.

The Protocols distinctly declare thatit is by means of the set of ideas which cluster around "democracy,"that their first victory over public opinion was obtained. The idea isthe weapon. And to be a weapon it must be an idea at variance with the naturaltrend of life. It must be a theory opposed to the facts of life. And no theoryso opposed can he expected to take root and become the ruling factor, unless itappeals to the mind as reasonable, inspiring and good. The Truth frequentlyseems unreasonable; the Truth frequently is depressing; the Truth sometimesseems to be evil; but it has the eternal advantage, it is the Truth, and what isbuilt thereon neither brings nor yields to confusion. This first stepdoes not give the control of public opinion, but leads up to it. It is worthy tonote that it is this sowing of "the poison of liberalism," as theProtocols name it, which comes first in order, in those documents Then,following upon that, the Protocols say:

·        "To obtain control overpublic opinion it is first necessary to confuse it."

Truth is one and cannot he confused,but this false, appealing liberalism which has been sown broadcast, and which isripening faster under Jewish nurture in America than ever it did in Europe, iseasily confused because it is not truth. Its is error, and error has a thousandforms. Take a nation, a party, a city an association in which "the poisonof liberalism" has been sown, and you can split that up into as manyfactions as there are individuals simply by throwing among them certainmodifications of the original idea. That is a piece of strategy well-known tothe forces that invisibly control mass-thought. Theodor Herzl, the arch-Jew, aman whose vision was wider than any contemporary statesman’s and whose programparalleled the Protocols, knew this many years ago when he said that the Zionist(cryptic for "Jewish") state would come before the Socialiststate could come; he knew with what endless divisions the "liberalism"which he and his predecessors had planted would be shackled and crippled.

The process of which all Gentiles havebeen the victims, but never the Jews – never the Jews! – is just this:First, to create an ideal of "broad-mindedness." That is the phrasewhich appears in every Jewish remonstrance against public mention of the Jew andhis alleged World Program: "We thought you were too broad-minded a man toexpress such thoughts." It is a sort of key word, indicative of the stateof mind in which it is desired that the Gentiles be kept. It is a state offlabby tolerance. A state of mind which mouths meaningless phrases aboutLiberty, phrases which act as an opiate on the mind and conscience and whichallow all sorts of things to be done under cover.

The phrase, the slogan, is a verydependable Jewish weapon, ("In all times people have accepted words foracts." – Protocol 5.) The reality behind the phrase the Protocols franklyadmit to be non-existent.

Men are born believers. For a timethey may believe in "broad-mindedness" and under the terrific socialpressure that has been set up in its favor they will openly espouse it. But itis too shallow to satisfy any growing roots of life. They must believe, deeply,something. For proof of this, notice the undeniable strength of the negativebeliefs which are held by men who fancy that they believe nothing. Therefore,some who are highly endowed with independence of spirit, root down into thoseprohibited matters which at some point touch Jewish concerns – these are the"narrow" men. But others find it more convenient to cultivate thosedepartments which promise a highway whereon there shall be no clashes of vitalopinion, no chance of the charge of "intolerance"; in short theytransfer all their contemplative powers to the active life; even as it iswritten in the Protocols – "To divert Gentile thought and observation,interest must be deflected to industry and commerce." It is just thisdeflection to the materialistic base that offer the Protocolists, and similarlyJewish propagandists, their best hold. "Broad-mindedness" – inleaving vital matters severely alone – descends quickly intomaterial-mindedness. Within this lower sphere all the discord which distressesthe world today is to be found.

It means, as everything about usshouts, the prostitution of service to profits and the eventual disappearance ofthe profits: it means that the high art of management degenerates intoexploitation. It means reckless confusion among the managers and dangerousunrest among the working men. But it means something worse; it means thesplitting up of Gentile society. Not a division between "Capital" and"Labor," but the division between the Gentile at both ends of theworking scheme, as the Protocols confirm: "To make it possible forliberty definitely to disintegrate and ruin Gentile society, industry must beplaced on a speculative basis."

With Jewish capital at one end of theGentile working scheme putting the screws on the manufacturers, and with Jewishagitators and disruptionists and subversives at the other end of the Gentileworking scheme putting the screws on the workmen, we have a condition at whichthe world managers of the Protocol program must be immensely satisfied. SeeProtocol Nine:

"We might fear the combinedstrength of the Gentiles of vision with the blind strength of the masses, butwe have taken all measures against such a possible contingency by raisinga wall of mutual antagonism between these two forces. Thus, the blind forceof the masses remains our support. We, and we alone, shall serve as theirleaders. Naturally, we will direct their energy to achieve our end."

The indication that they are highlysatisfied is that they are not only not doing anything to relieve the worldsituation, but are apparently willing to have it made worse. The privationswhich are scheduled for it (unless Gentile flabbiness before the Jewish power,high and low, receives a new backbone), will bring the United States to theverge, if not across the very line, of Bolshevism. The Jews know the wholemethod of artificial scarcity and high prices. It was practiced in the FrenchRevolution and in Russia. All the signs of it are in this country too.

It is not difficult to see thegenealogy of the Jewish ideas of liberalism from their origin to their latesteffects upon Gentile life. The confusion aimed at is here! Bewildermentcharacterizes the whole mental climate of the people today. They do not knowwhat to believe. First one set of facts is given to them, then another. Firstone explanation of conditions is given to them, and then another. Thefact-shortage is acute. There is a whole marketful of explanations that explainnothing, only deepen the confusion. The government itself seems to behampered, and whenever it starts on a line of investigation finds itselfmysteriously tangled up so that procedure is difficult. This governmental aspectis also clearly set forth in the Protocols. Add to this the onslaught on thehuman tendency toward religion, which is usually the last barrier to fall beforeviolence and robbery unashamed stalk forth.

To conclude this general view of the method,rather this part of the method, the confusion itself, which all Jewishinfluences converge to produce, it is expected to produce another more deeplyhelpless state. And that state is Exhaustion. It needs no imagination tosee what this means. Exhaustion is today one of the conditions that menace thepeople. The war and its strain began the exhaustion; the "peace" andits confusion have about completed it. The people believe in little and expectless. Confidence is gone. Initiative is nearly gone. The failure of movementsfalsely heralded as "people’s movements" has gone far to make thepeople think that no people’s movement is possible. So say the Protocols:

·        "To wear everyoneout by dissensions, animosities, feuds, famine, inoculation of diseases,want, until the Gentiles see no other way of escape except by an appeal to ourmoney power." – Protocol 10.

·        "We will so wear outand exhaust the Gentiles by all this that they will be compelled to offer usan international authority, which by its position will enable us to absorbwithout disturbance all the governmental forces of the world and thus form asuper-government. We must so direct the education of the Gentile Society thatits hands will drop in the weakness of discouragement in the face of anyundertaking where initiative is needed." – Protocol 5.

The Jews have never been worn out orexhausted. They have never been nonplussed. That is the true psychiccharacteristic of those who have a clue to the maze. It is the unknown thatexhausts the mind, the constant wandering around among tendencies and influenceswhose source is not known and whose purpose is not understood. Walking in thedark is wearing work. The Gentiles have been doing it for centuries. The others,having a pretty accurate idea what it was all about, have not succumbed. Evenpersecution is endurable if it is understandable, and the Jews of the world havealways known just where it fitted in the scheme of things. Gentiles havesuffered more from Jewish persecutions than have the Jews for after thepersecutions were over, the Gentile was as much in the dark as ever; whereasJudaism simply took up again its century-long march toward a goal in which itimplicitly believes, and which, some say who have a deep knowledge of Jewishroots in the world and who, too, may be touched with exhaustion, they willachieve. However this may be the revolution which would be necessary to unfastenthe International Jewish system from its grip on the world, would probably haveto be just as radical as any attempts the Jews have made to attain that grip.There are those who express serious doubts that the Gentiles are competent to doit at all. Maybe not. Let them at least know who their conquerors are.

_____________________________________________________

"To each act of opposition wemust be in a position to respond by bringing war through the neighbours of anycountry that dares to oppose us, and if these neighbours should plan to standcollectively against us, we must let loose a world war."

- The Seventh Protocol

7. How The Jews Use Power

Two organizations, both of which areas notable for their concealment as for their power, are the New York Kehillahand the American Jewish Committee. The Kehillah is the most potent factor in thepolitical life of New York; it is the organization which today wields so largean influence on the rest of the world, which consciously issues a program whichon one side is pro-Jewish and on the other anti-Gentile. It is the centralgroup, the inner government, whose ruling is law and whose act is the officialexpression of Jewish purpose. It offers a real and complete instance of agovernment within a government in the midst of America’s largest andpolitically most powerful city, and it also constitutes the machine throughwhich pro-Jewish and anti-Gentile propaganda is operated and Jewish pressurebrought to bear against certain American ideas. That is to say, the Jewishgovernment of New York constitutes the essential part of the Jewish Governmentof the United States.

The word "Kehillah" has thesame meaning as "Kahal," which signifies "community,""assembly" or government. It represents the Jewish forn of Governmentin dispersion. In the Babylonian captivity, in Eastern Europe today, the Kahalis the power and protectorate to which the faithful Jew looks for government andjustice. The New York Kehillah is the largest and most powerful union of Jews inthe world, the center of Jewish world power has been transferred to that city.That is the meaning of the heavy migration of Jews all over the world toward NewYork in recent decades. It is to them what Rome is to the Catholic and whatMecca is to the Moslem.

The Kehillah is a perfect answer tothe deceptive statement that the Jews are so divided among themselves as torender a concert of action impossible. That is one of the statements made forGentile consumption. All experience shows, even to the most casual observer ofJewish activities, that the capitalist and the bolshevik, the rabbi and theunion leader are all united under the flag of Judah. Touch the conservativecapitalist who is a Jew, and the red communist who is also a Jew will spring tohis defense. It may be that sometimes they love each other less, but altogetherthey hate the non-Jew more, and that is their common bond. The Kehillah is analliance, more offensive than defensive, against the "Gentiles."

It is a strange and impressivespectacle which the Kehillah presents, of a people of one racial origin, with avivid belief in itself and its future, disregarding internal differences, tocombine privately in a powerful organization for the racial, material andreligious advancement of its own race, to the exclusion of all others.

The American Jewish Committee cameinto being in 1906. There had been a government investigation into the"White Slave Traffic," the result of which was a direct set of publicopinion into channels uncomplimentary to the Jews, and a defensive movement wasbegun. The Kehillah organized protests against the statement by General Bingham,then police commissioner of the City of New York, that 50 per cent of the crimein the metropolis was committed by Jews. Very soon afterward, General Binghamdisappeared from public life, and a national magazine of power and influencewhich had embarked on a series of articles setting forth the government’sfindings in the White Slave investigation was forced to discontinue afterprinting the first article.

The Kehillah has mapped out New Yorkjust as the American Jewish Committee has mapped the United States, andpractically every Jew belongs to one or more lodges, secret societies, unions,orders, committees and federations. The list is a prodigious one. The purposesinterlace and the methods dovetail in such a manner as to bring every phase ofAmerican life not only under the watchful eye, but under the swift and powerfu1action of experienced compulsion upon public affairs.

At the meeting which organized theKehillah a number of sentiments were expressed which are worthy of considerationtoday; Judah L. Magnes, then rabbi of Temple Emanu-el, chairman of the meeting,set forth the plan:

·        "A central organizationlike that of the Jewish community of New York City is necessary to create aJewish public opinion," he said.

Rabbi Asher was loudly applauded whenhe said:

·        "American interests areone, Jewish interests are another thing."

The delegates at the first openmeeting in 19O6 represented 222 Jewish societies – religious, political,industrial and communal. Just over a year later the number of Jewishorganizations under the jurisdiction of the Kehillah aggregated 688, and in 1921well over 1,000. When the aggressive program of the Kehillah to make New York aJewish city, and through New York to make the United States a Jewish country,was announced some of the more conservative Jews of New York were timorous. Theydid not expect that the American people would stand for it. They thought theAmerican people would immediately understand what was afoot and oppose it. Therewere others who doubted whether the same Kehillah authority could here bewielded over the Jews as was wielded in the old country ghettoes. An official ofthe Kehillah wrote:

·        "There were those whodoubted the ultimate success of this new venture in Jewish organization. Theybased their lack of belief on the fact that no governmental authority couldpossibly be secured; in other words, that the Kehillah of New York could nothope to wield the same power, based on governmental coercion as the Kehillahs ofthe Old World."

There is much in this paragraph toindicate the status of the Kehillah in Jewish life. Add to this fact that allthe Jews who entered America lived under the Kehillahs of the old world, whosepower was based on coercion, and the situation is simple. Regimentation, thedestruction of individual liberty which has risen to curse the world, is thebasic principle of Jewish government of the Jews, by the Jews.

What else can happen when worldgovernment of the Gentiles by the Jews for the bankers becomes established?

However, the misgivings of some Jewswere not justified. The Americans made no protest. The Kehillah went ahead withits campaign and America submitted. New York became Jewish. American life,American thought and American politics, became Jewish-dominated in the decadesthat followed. But with it all, the Jews exhibit a sense of the insecurity ofthis usurpation of power. It does not belong to those who have seized it; itdoes not belong either by right of numbers, or by right of superior ability, oryet by right of a better use made of that power. They have taken power inAmerica by audacity; have taken it in such a way as to make resentment of itseem like an anti-racial movement – and that is why they have held it as longas they have. That is the only way to explain the meekness of the Americans inthis matter, and it also accounts for the sense of insecurity which even theJews feel in the position they hold. The American is the slowest person in theworld to act on any line that savors of racial or religious prejudice. Thismakes for a seeming aloofness from matters like the Jewish Question. This alsoleads the uninformed public men to sign protests against"anti-Semitism" which are really designed to be protests against thepublication of Jewish facts. The foundation, organization and rapid success ofthe Kehillah in New York is an object lesson set in the sight of the world, asto what the Jew can do and will do when he exalts himself to the seat of rule.

As to the Kehillah being officiallyrepresentative, it may be added that the Kehillah has in it representatives ofthe Central Conference of American Rabbis, Eastern Council of Reform Rabbis,Independent Order of B’nai B’rith, Independent Order of B’rith Sholom,Independent Order of Free Sons of Israel, Independent Order of B’rith Abraham,Federation of American Zionists – orthodox Jews, reform Jews, "apostateJews," rich Jews, poor Jews, law-abiding Jews and red revolutionary Jews.At the 1918 Convention there were present: Jacob H. Schiff, banker; LouisMarshall, lawyer, president of the American Jewish Committee; Adolf S. Ochs,proprietor of the "New York Times"; Otto A. Rosalsky, judge ofthe General Sessions Court; Otto H. Kahn, of the banking house of Kuhn, Loeb andCompany – AND – Benjamin Schlesinger, who had lately returned from Moscowwhere he had a conference with Lenin; Joseph Schlossberg, general secretary ofthe Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America; Max Pine, also a recent consultantwith the Bolshevik rulers of Russia; David Pinski; Joseph Barondess, laborleader. The high and the low were there; the first world war was closing, theRussian Revolution had been won. Judge Mack, who headed the War Risk InsuranceBureau of the United States Government, and the little leader of the reddestgroup in the East End – they all met in the Kehillah, as Jews. Adolph Ochs ofthe great "New York Times" together with the most feverishscribbler on a Yiddish weekly that calls for blood and violence, all of them ofall classes, bound together in a solidarity which has been achieved by no otherpeople so perfectly as by Judah. Banded together for the purpose of"protecting Jewish rights." [Editor’s Note: The Kehillah has nowexpanded its work and influence internationally in the powerful organizationknown as the World Jewish Congress.]

The Jewish Demand For "Rights" In America

What rights have Americans that Jewsin America do not possess? Against whom are the Jews organized and against what?What basis is there for the cry of "persecution"? None whatever,except the Jews’ own consciousness that the course they are pursuing is duefor a check. The Jews always know that. They are not in the stream of the world,and every little while the world finds out what Judah always knows. The programof the Kehillah was ostensibly to "assert Jewish rights." No Jewishrights have ever been interfered with in America. The expression was a euphemismfor a campaign to interfere with non-Jewish rights.

The New York Kehillah is the patternand parent Jewish community in the United States, the visible entourage of theJewish government, the dynamo which motivates those "protests" and"mass meetings" which are frequently heralded throughout the country,and the arsenal of that kind of dark power which the Jewish leaders know so wellhow to use. It is the "whispering gallery," where the famouswhispering drives are originated and set in motion and made to break in lyingpublicity over the country. The liaison between this center of Jewish power andthe affairs of the people of the United States is made by the American JewishCommittee. The Committee and the Kehillah are practically identical as far asthe national Jewish program is concerned. Through their foreign associationsthey are also identical as far as the world program is concerned.

The United States is divided into 12parts by the American Jewish Committee and every State belongs to a districtheaded by the most powerful and representative Jews. The Committee representsthe focusing point of the religious, racial, financial and political will ofJewry. It is also the executive committee of the New York Kehillah. New YorkJewry is the dynamo of the national Jewish machinery. Its national instrument isthe American Jewish Committee. Among its direct leaders and supporters today arethe owners of powerful newspapers, officials in Federal, State and Cityadministration, influential office holders on public boards and corporations,members of the judiciary and police departments, financiers and heads of bankinghouses, mercantile and manufacturing establishments, labor and political partyorganizers of all colors.

There are certain announced purposesof these associations, and there are certain purposes which are not announced.The announced purposes may be read in printed pages; the purposes not announcedmay be read in the records of attempted acts and achieved results. To keep therecord straight let us look first at the announced purposes of the AmericanJewish Committee, then of the Kehillah; next at the line which binds the twotogether; and then at the real purposes as they are to be construed froma long list of attempts and achievements. The American Jewish Committee,officially organized in 1906, announced itself as incorporated for the followingpurposes:

1.     To prevent the infraction of the civil and religiousrights of the Jews in any part of the world.

2.     To render all lawful assistance and to take appropriate remedial actionin the event of threatened or actual invasion or restriction of such rights, orof unfavorable discrimination with respect thereto.

3.     To secure for Jews equality of economic, social and educationalopportunities.

4.     To alleviate the consequences of persecution wherever they may occur, andto afford relief from calamities affecting the Jews.

It is an exclusively Jewish program.The Charter of the Kehillah empowered it, among other things, to establish aneducational bureau, to adjust differences between Jewish residents ororganizations by arbitration or by means of boards of mediation or conciliation;while the Constitution announces the purpose to be:

·        "To further the causeof Judaism in New York City and to represent the Jews in this city with respectto all local matters of Jewish interest."

Where the American Jewish Committeeand the Kehillah join forces is shown as follows:

·        "Furthermore, inasmuchas the American Jewish Committee was a national organization, the JewishCommunity (Kehillah), of New York City, if combined with it, would have a voicein shaping the policy of Jewry throughout the land. It is expresslyunderstood that the American Jewish Committee shall have exclusive jurisdictionover all questions of a national or international character affecting theJews generally."

It will be seen, therefore, that theKehillah and the American Jewish Committee are one. The capital of the UnitedStates, in Jewish affairs, is New York. Perhaps that may throw a sidelight onthe efforts which are constantly made to exalt New York as the spring and sourceof all the thoughts of the day. [Editor’s Note: And now the seat of the UnitedNations system of world government!) New York, the Jewish capital of the UnitedStates, has been made the financial center, the art center, the political centerof the country. But its art is oriental sensuousness, its politics those of aJudaized Tammany. It is the home of anti-American propaganda, of pro-Jewishhysteria, a mad confusion of mind that now passes all over the world as the truepicture of America.

The doctrine with which so large amass as the citizens of America have been inoculated is making havoc with thewhole American program today. It is "broadening" America out of allsemblance to its distinctive self and blurring out of recognition thosedetermining ideals and ideas on which American institutions were based.

"Jewish Rights" Clash With American Rights

This study of the Jewish Question inthe United States is not based upon religious differences. The religious elementdoes not enter except when it is injected by the Jews themselves; theypersistently inject it in three ways: First, in their allegation that any studyof the Jews is "religious persecution"; second, by their own recordsof what their activities in the United States consist of; third, by theimpression which is very misleading if not corrected, that the Jews are the OldTestament people. The Jews are not the Old Testament people and the OldTestament can be found among them only with difficulty. They are a Talmudicalpeople who have preferred the volumes of rabbinical speculation to the words ofthe ancient prophets.

In this series of articles we have setaside every non-Jewish statement on this religious question, and have acceptedonly that which proceeds from recognized Jewish sources. It has been mostilluminating, in studying the proceedings of the New York Kehillah and theAmerican Jewish Committee, and their affiliated organizations, as represented bytheir activities throughout the country, to find how large a part of theseactivities have a religious bearing, as being directly and combativelyanti-Christian.

That is to say, when the Jews setforth in the public charters and constitutions of their organizations that theironly purpose is to "protect Jewish rights," and when the public askswhat are these "Jewish rights" which need protection in this freecountry, the answer can be found only in the actions which the Jews take tosecure that "protection."

Thus interpreted, "'Jewishrights" seem to be summed up in the "right" to banish everythingfrom their sight and hearing that suggests Christianity or its Founder. It isjust there, from the Jewish side, that religious intolerance makes itsappearance.

Attacks On Christianity

Previous to the formation of theKehillah and the Jewish Committee, this sort of attack on the rights ofAmericans was sporadic, but since 1906 it has increased in number andinsistence. Under cover of the ideal of Liberty we have given the Jews libertyto attack Liberty. What America has been tolerating is intolerance itself. Letus look rapidly down the years and see one phase of that attack. It is theattack upon Christianity. Here are a few items from the record. They arerecorded over a period of years following the rise of Jewish power in America:

1899-1900. The Jews attempt to havethe word "Christian" removed from the Bill of Rights of the State ofVirginia.

19O6-1907. The Jews of Oklahomapetition the Constitutional Convention protesting that the acknowledgment ofChrist in the new State constitution then being formulated would repugnant tothe Constitution of the United States.

The Jews force "The Merchant ofVenice" to be dropped from public schools in Texas and Ohio.

1907-1908. Widespread demand by theJews for the complete secularization of the public institutions of this country,as a part of the demand of the Jews for their constitutional rights.

Supreme Court Justice Brewer’sstatement that this is a Christian country widely controverted by Jewish rabbisand publications.

Jews agitate in many cities againstBible reading. Christmas celebrations or carols in Philadelphia, Cincinnati, St.Paul and New York met with strong Jewish opposition.

1908-1909. Protests made to Governorof Arkansas against "Christological expressions" employed by him inhis Thanksgiving Day proclamation.

Professor Gotthard Deutsch protestsagainst "Christological prayers" at the high school graduatingexercises at Cincinnati.

Jewish community in Tamaqua,Pennsylvania, defeats resolutions providing daily Bible reading in schools.

Local Council of Jewish Women ofBaltimore petitions school board to prohibit Christmas exercises.

Boycotts were instituted in New Yorkagainst merchants who opened on Saturday.

Special efforts at this period tointroduce the idea of the Jewish Sabbath into public business. Jews refused tosit as jurors in court, thus postponing cases.

1909-1910. On demand of the Jews, theschool board of Bridgeport, Pennsylvania, votes to discontinue the recitation ofthe Lord’s Prayer in the school.

In Newark, New Jersey, the rabbis askthe night schools to discontinue Friday evening sessions, because the JewishSabbath begins at sundown on Friday.

The work of introducing the idea ofJewish national holidays into public life especially active.

1910-1911. An attempt to have Hebrewofficially recognized was frustrated by Supreme Court Judge Goff.

Chicago Jews have election date changebase the official date fell on the last day of the Passover.

Jews oppose Bible reading and singingof hymns in Detroit schools.

Rabbis force Hartford, Connecticut,school board to drop "The Merchant of Venice" from reading list.

New York Kehillah does twocontradictory things; favors bill to permit Jews to do all kinds of business onSunday, and pledges itself to co-operate in the strict enforcement of the Sundaylaws.

1911-1912. Jews in Passaic, NewJersey, petition school board to eliminate Bible reading and all Christian songsfrom the schools.

At request of a rabbi, threeprincipals of Roxbury, Mass., public schools agree to banish Christmas tree andomit all references to the season from their schools.

A Jewish delegate to the OhioConstitutional Convention suggests that the Constitution be made to forbidChristian religious references in schools.

The Council of the UniversitySettlement, at the request of the New York Kehillah, adopts this resolution:"That in the holiday celebrations held annually by the KindergartenAssociation at the University Settlement every feature of any sectariancharacter, including Christmas trees, Christmas programs and Christmas songs,shall be eliminated."

1912-1913. Jews at Jackson, Tennessee,seek an injunction to prevent the reading of the Bible in City schools.

Annual Convention Independent OrderB’nai B’rith at Nashville, Tennessee, adopts resolution against reading ofthe Bible and singing Christian songs in public schools.

Chicago Board of Education, scene ofmuch Jewish agitation, approves recommendation of sub-committee to removeChristmas from the list of official public holidays in schools.

1913-1914. The energies of the Jewishpowers were concentrated on the task of preventing the United States fromchanging the immigration laws in a manner to protect the country fromundesirable aliens.

1914-1915. More Kehillah attempts tosecure modification of the Sunday laws.

1915-1916. Jewish opposition tovarious movements towards making the schools free to use the Bible.

1916-1917. Jews busy carrying out animmense campaign against the "literacy clause" of the ImmigrationBill.

On demand of the Jews the New Haven,Connecticut, Board of Education prevents the reading of "The Merchant ofVenice," and extends the prohibition to "Lamb’s Tales fromShakespeare."

1918-1919. Provost Marshal Crowder, incharge of the Selective Draft U.S. Forces, had issued an order to all medicalexaminers, under direction of the Surgeon General, stating: "Theforeign-born, especially Jews, are more apt to malinger than thenative-born." Louis Marshall, head of the American Jewish Committee,telegraphed demanding that the "further use of this form shall be at oncediscontinued." President Wilson ordered the excision of the paragraph.

The United States Shipping Board sentan advertisement to the "New York Times," calling for a file clerk andstating that a "Christian" was preferred – by which is meant alwaysa non-Jew – the paper rejected it. Louis Marshall again went into action andprotested to Bainbridge Colby, Woodrow Wilson’s Secretary of State, demanding"Not because of any desire for inflicting punishment, but for the sakeof example and the establishment of a necessary precedent thisoffense should be followed by a dismissal from the public office of theoffender, and the public should be informed the reason." Attention iscalled to the tone which the American Jewish Committee adopts when addressinghigh American officials in the name of Jewry. It is not to be duplicated in theaddresses of any other representative of any other race of faith.

The Plattsburg Manual, published forofficers in the United States officers’ training camps, contained thestatement that "the ideal officer is a Christian gentleman." TheA.J.C. at once protested against "Christological manifestations," andthe Manual was changed to read "the ideal officer is a courteousgentleman."

The Anti-Defamation Committee claimedthat 150 American cities had excluded "The Merchant of Venice" fromthe public schools.

1919-1920. The Kehillah was sosuccessful in its campaign that it was possible for a Jewish advertiser in NewYork to say that he wanted only Jewish help, but it was not possible for anon-Jewish advertiser to state his non-Jewish preference.

And so it goes on, year after year,right up to the present day. The incidents quoted are typical not occasional.They represent what is transpiring all the time in the United States as the Jewspursue their "rights." There is no interference with Jewish ways andmanners. The Jew may use his own calendar, keep his own days, observe his ownform of worship, live in his own ghetto, exist on a dietary principle all hisown, slaughter his cattle in a manner which no one who knows about it canapprove – he can do all these things without molestation, without theslightest question of his right in them. But, the non-Jew is the"persecuted one." He must do everything the way the Jew wants it done;if not he is infringing on Jewish "rights."

The Cry Of "Anti-Semitism"

What people are now coming to see isthat it is American rights that have been interfered with, and the interferencehas been made with the assistance of their own "broadminded"tolerance. The Jews’ interference with the religion of others, and the Jews’determination to wipe out of public life every sign of the predominant.Christian character of the United States, is the only active form of religiousintolerance in the country today. Not content with the fullest liberty to followtheir own faith in peace and quietness, in a country where none dare make themafraid, the Jews declare – we read it in their activities – that every sightand sound of anything Christian is an invasion of their peace and quietness, andso they stamp it out wherever they can reach it through political means. To whatlengths this spirit may run is shown in the prophecies of the Talmud, and in the"reforms" undertaken by the Communists of Russia and Eastern Europe.

That is not all; not content withtheir own liberty, not content with the "secularization," which meansthe de-Christianization of all public institutions, the third step observable inJewish activities is the actual exaltation of Judaism as a recognized andspecially privileged system. The program is the now familiar one wherever theJewish program is found: first, establishment; second, the destruction of allthat is non-Jewish or anti-Jewish; third, exaltation of Judaism in all itsphases.

Put the Lord’s Prayer and certainShakespeare plays out of the public schools, but put Jewish courts in the publicbuildings – that is the way it works. Secularization is preparatory toJudaization. The New York Kehillah is an illustration of how it is done, and theAmerican Jewish-Committee is an illustration of the type of men who do it.

The work of Kehillah is claimed to be"educational" by its defenders, on the few occasions when it isattacked. It is certainly that. The best educated members are those who comefrom the Eastern European ghettos where the Kehillah idea is fully understoodand practiced and where Jewish – community – government exercisedunrestricted sway. Whatever other phase of education the Kehillah may beinterested in, it certainly stresses most the education to separateness.Dr. S. Benderley, director of the Bureau of Education, gave away the objects ofthe Kehillah "education" thus:

·        "The problem before uswas to form a body of young Jews who should be on the one hand true Americans, apart of this Republic, with an intense interest in building up American ideals;and yet, on the other hand, be also Jews in love with the best of their ownideals, and not anxious merely to merge with the rest and disappear amongthem. That problem confronts Orthodox and Reform Jews alike. It is notmerely a religious but a civic problem."

That is separatism and exclusivenessas an educational program, and its result cannot help being training in ideas ofracial superiority and exclusivism.

It is the Jews’ unceasingconsciousness of the "Goy" that constitutes the disease of Judaism,this centuries-long tradition of separateness. There is no such thing as"anti-Semitism." There is, however, much anti-Goyism. In all thecountries of the world there is no anti-Arab sentiment of which anyone knows.None of the Semite people have been distinguished by the special dislike of anyother people. There is no reason why anyone should dislike the Semites.

It is very strange, however, that theSemite people should be a unit in disliking the Jews. Palestine, which stillonly has a handfu1 of Jews [Editor’s Note: The original was written in 1921when the Jewish population of Palestine was still insignificant. In 1918 it wasonly about 4 per cent.], is peopled by Semites who so thoroughly dislike theJews that serious complications are threatening the Zionist advances being madethere. This surely is not anti-Semitism. Semites are not against Semites. Theyare at odds with Jews.

When Aryan and Semite are keptconscious through many centuries that the Jew is another and superior race, andwhen it is known that neither Aryan nor Semite are touchy on the race question,what is the answer? Only this, that the whole substance of such a situation mustbe supplied by the Jews.

There is no such thing asanti-Semitism. There is only a very little and a very mild anti-Jewism.

But a study of Jewish publications,books, pamphlets, declarations, constitutions and charters, as well as a studyof organized Jewish action in this and other countries, indicates that there isa tremendous amount of anti-Goyism, or anti-Gentilism.

__________________________________________

"The administrators chosen by usfrom the masses for their servility will not be persons trained for government,and consequently they will easily become pawns in our game, played by ourlearned and talented counsellors, specialists educated from early childhood toadminister world affairs. As we know, our specialists have been acquiring thenecessary knowledge for governing * * *."

- The Second Protocol

8. Jewish Influence In American Politics

Within the memory of even young men,Tammany Hall has been the synonym of all political trickery in the vocabulary ofpopular criticism. Tammany Hall was held up as the worst example of boss rule,political corruption, brute force, that it was possible to find in the world.Its very name became a stigma in the decades before the first world war. Buteven the most unobservant newspaper reader must have observed the gradual fadingout of Tammany Hall from public comment, the cessation of the bitter criticism,the entire absence of headlines bristling witty ugly charges, and the calling ofthe hosts of good citizenship to do battle against the grim bossism thatmaintained its headquarters in New York.

Why the change in recent years? Is itdue to the dying out of Tammany Hall as a political force? No, Tammany Hall isstill there, as any New York politician will tell you. The Tammany tiger has notchanged its stripes.

There was a time when fearlesspublications told the truth about Tammany, but they have either gone out ofexistence or have fallen under control of the Jews. There was a time when publicbodies like the Citizens Union organized to oppose Tammany and to keep avolunteer vigil on its activities; these groups have succumbed to Jewishcontributions and officer-ship and no longer stand guard.

The outcry against Tammany seemed tobe hushed the moment that Tammany patronage fell into the hands of the New YorkJews, where it now remains, the Kehillah being the real political center, andTammany but a distributing station – a sort of "Gentile front" forthe more powerful Kehillah. The Judaization of Tammany is now complete, for theIrish element has been overcome by Jewish money.

Tammany was one of the strongestpolitical organizations ever seen in the United States. Potent not only inmunicipal and state politics, but often exercising a decisive influence onnational affairs. It was, without exaggeration, unequalled in any country in theworld.

If there is one quality that attractsJews, it is power. Wherever the seat of power may be, thither they swarmobsequiously. As Tammany was power and the gate of power, it was natural thatthe Jews of the biggest Jewish city in the world should court it. Doubtless,they were also affected by incongruity of the fact that in the biggest Jewishcity, the most solid political power was non-Jewish. When the German Jewishbanker, Schoenberg, went to America under the name of August Belmont torepresent the interests of the Rothschilds, his keen eye at once took in thesituation. He became a member and supporter of Tammany. It was good business forthis Jewish banker, because the funds of the Rothschilds were heavily investedin New York transport. The properties of city tractions are, as in all Americancities, at the mercy of the local Tammany power, by whatever name it may beknown. Belmont eventually attained the coveted eminence of Grand Sachem of theTammany Society. Belmont-Schoenberg opened the way for the rest of the Jews; theFreedman’s, Untermeyer’s, Straus’s; financiers, lawyers, politicians,business men and union sharks. There soon followed the wholesale appointment ofJews to the judiciary of New York until New York became a political and legalJewish preserve; and onwards to the Supreme Court where Jewish influence neverlooked back since the now distant day of the Jewish capture of Tammany Hall.

It was necessary for a Jewry thatplanned to control the judiciary, as well as to provide special protection forcertain Jewish enterprises that are near enough to the borderline of the law tomerit question, it was necessary to obtain control of the supreme politicalengine through which favors are disbursed in local politics. The peculiar systemof local, state and national government in the United States made it easy forthe control of such organizations to be gained by money.

The Jew’s natural political homeseems to be in the Republican Party, for thither he returns after ventureelsewhere; but his predilection for the Republican Party does not move the Jewto make the mistake of being exclusively the partisan of one group. It isbetter, he knows, to control all groups. Strong as Jewry became in Tammany, itwas even stronger in the ranks of the Republican Party, while New York socialismwas, and is, completely headed and manned by Jews. This renders it extremelyeasy for the Jews to swing support in whichever direction they choose, and forKehillah to fulfill any threat it may make. It also insures that any Jewishcandidate on any ticket will be elected.

Because of the powerful Irish controlof Tammany at the beginning, the Jews worked cautiously. The Kehillah adoptedthe ancient policy, not of putting forward their own people, but non-Jews whocould be useful to Judah. The difference between pro-Jewish politicians who arenot themselves Jews, and politicians of the Jewish race, is that the former cansometimes go further than the Jew in office can, without detection. Thus, in theearly days of Tammany, indeed until just before World War I there was always a"Gentile front" in Tammany offices basking in the glory of Tammanypublicity, but always in the background there was his "Jewishcontrol." This is the formula for citizens who wish to know the meaning ofthings otherwise unexplained – "look for the ‘Jewish control’."To this end, therefore, the Jews have been strong in all parties, so thatwhichever way the election went, the Jews would win. In New York it is alwaysthe Jewish party that wins. Whoever wins New York rules the Government.

As always election campaigns arestaged as an entertainment, a diversion for the people; they are permitted tothink and act as if they are really making them own government, but it is alwaysthe Jews that win. And if after having elected their man or group, obedience isnot rendered to the Jewish control, then you speedily hear of"scandals" and "investigations" and "impeachments"for the removal of the disobedient.

Usually a man with a "past"proves the most obedient instrument, but even a good man can often be tangled upin campaign practices that compromise him. It has been commonly known thatJewish manipulation of American election campaigns have been so skillfullyhandled, that no matter which candidate was elected, there was ready made asufficient amount of evidence to discredit him in case his Jewish masters neededto discredit him. To arrange this is part of the thoroughness of Jewish control.And, of course, the American people have been sufficiently trained to roaragainst the public official immediately the first Jewish hound emits its warningbay.

Amazing as is the technique of theJewish political process, the readiness with which the American people can becounted on to do their part in forwarding the game is still more amazing.

Aliens And Tammany Leadership

The strength of Tammany had exactlythe same source as the strength of the Kehillah, namely, in the foreignpopulation; the difference being that the Kehillah had a more compact foreignmass to draw upon. But both the Kehillah leaders and the Tammany leaders havealways been alertly aware of the fact that their power depended upon anuninterrupted flow of immigration. It is always the foreigner that makes thebest material for the Kehillah’s purpose, until American became so thoroughlyun-Americanized as to make intensive immigration no longer essential. It wasonly then that immigration began to slow down. The third great influx ofimmigration into the United States occurred in 1884 and was really the cause ofthe beginning of the degeneration of New York, and then of American politicallife. The-great wave was composed of Russian, Austrian and Hungarian Jews, whosearrival was followed by a memorable period of crime, the marks of which remainto this day.

At that time the police department andthe police courts before which all criminal cases in the city were firstbrought, were in the hands of Tammany Hall under the notorious Boss Croker. Theresult of the Jewish control was a partnership between local government andcrime which has not been duplicated outside of Semitic countries. Immigrant Jewsof the shadier type organized an association called The Max HochstimAssociation, which was known as the "Essex Market Court Gang." One ofits chief leaders was Martin Engel, Tammany leader of the Eighth District. The"king" of this Jewish district was a man named Solomon who had changedhis name to the less revealing one of "Smith," and who became known as"Silver Dollar Smith," because of the fact that he ruled his littleempire from the Silver Dollar Saloon. This saloon was just opposite the EssexMarket Court, which was thronged daily by hordes of Yiddish criminals, thebondsmen, the false witnesses and lawyers. Lee Max Hochstim Association becamethe first organized White Slavery Group in America, and the revelations made bythe United States Government Investigation Committee are shuddering exposures ofthat lowest form of depravity – a coolly conducted, commercialized,consolidated traffic in women. The traffic was made to yield dividends topoliticians, to Tammany Jews in particular; it was during the officialinvestigation that the Max Hochstim Association became known as the "EssexMarket Court Gang." Out of the old police court in the "redlight" Essex Market district, New York, comes a word which has fixed itselfin common English speech. A lawyer named Scheuster, whose practices were quitecharacteristics, made himself very obnoxious to Justice Osborne. Wheneveranother Yiddish lawyer attempted a shady trick the judge would openly denounceit as "Scheuster practice," and so it came that the first men in theprofession to bear the name of "shyster," were the Yiddish lawyers ofEssex Market Court, New York.

Jews And The White Slave Scandal

It is a surprising fact that, althoughthese matters are written in official documents, and although the same mattershave been written into the record of every similar investigation which has beenmade, Jewish leaders persist in denying that the leaders in this particular formof depravity are Jews. When the United States Government made a nation-wideinvestigation, it found and recorded the same facts. The New York Kehillah cameinto existence as a defense organization at a time when the exposure of theJewish White Slave Traffic threatened to overwhelm the New York ghetto.

The exposure which resulted when thewhite people of New York finally succeeded in getting the forces of the law tofunction impartially for a little while, caused many of the implicated Jews tochange their names. These names are now representative of some of the bestJewish families, whose concealed bar sinister is the fact that the foundation ofthe family fortune was laid in the red light districts. The Max HochstimAssociation was not the only organization of its kind to be unearthed. Anotherwas the New York Independent Benevolent Association, which was organized in 1896by a party of Jewish white slave dealers. Gangs like these formed the backboneof Tammany power in the slum districts; their principal field of operations wasthe cheap dance halls, their cover the "benevolent associations" inthe East Side, all run by Jewish leaders, chiefly Russian and Galician Jews, asthe official report exposes. They were slavers as their forbears were in thedays of Rome’s decline; they were bootleggers before the days of prohibition;and they constituted a strong support of the international narcotic ring whichto this day has defied the law by corrupting the officers of the law.

In the decade before the first worldwar, in seizing control and exploiting New York, the Jews made one of theircyclically recurring mistakes; they carried things too far with too high a hand.They survived the exposure, however, and retained their power. It is this Jewishtendency to boast and overdo that has always given the game away. Superficialobservers and writers have noted the recurrent protests against Jewishpresumption and bumptiousness and have explained them as being recurrent spasmsof a vile poison which is supposed to reside in the blood of the Gentile – thevile poison of anti-Semitism. That is, of course, the conventional Jewishpropaganda explanation, and many Gentile clergy, writers and politiciansinnocently retail it; many other Gentile worshippers of Jewish money cynicallyconnive at the treachery. It always breaks out after wars, say some of thesewriters. Why after wars? Because in wars the world sees more clearly than atother times the real purpose and personality of the Jew. Thus, it is notanti-Semitism that breaks out – it is Judaism, gross and exaggerated Semitism;and the serum that forms in the social body to encist and control the germ ofJudaism comes in the form of public exposure and protest. That serum is workingnow – the serum of publicity; and the Jewish program cannot endure it.

Study the history of all thingswhatsoever into which the Jews inject themselves, from summer resorts toempires, and you see the same cycle appearing.

The Jewish conquest of Tammany,however, is only one phase of the conquest of New York. The Jewish objective ismore than political. Merely to insure that the lucrative and powerful officersof the city shall be their own people, is not the end in view. New York has beenturned into the Red Center of America. There most of the alien treason carriedon against the government of the United States has its source. Tammany is aconvenient cover for ostensible political activity as the Kehillah is for themore radical racial and anti-American racial activity.

____________________________________________________________________

"We shall soon begin to establish hugemonopolies, colossal reservoirs of wealth, upon which even the big Gentileproperties will he dependent to such an extent that they will all fall togetherwith the government credit on the day following the political catastrophe. Theeconomics here present must carefully weigh the significance of thiscombination. We must develop by every means the importance of oursuper-government, representing it as the protector and benefactor of all whovoluntarily submit to us.

"The aristocracy of the Gentileas a political force has passed away. We need not take them into consideration.But, as owners of the land, they are harmful to us in that they are independentin their sources of livelihood. Therefore, at all costs, we must deprive them oftheir land.

"The best means to attain this isto increase the taxes and mortgage indebtedness. These measures will keep landownership in a state of unconditional subordination. Unable to satisfy theirneeds by small inheritances, the aristocrats among the Gentile will burnthemselves out rapidly.

"At the same time it is necessaryto encourage trade and industry vigorously and especially speculation, thefunction of which is to act as a counterpoise to industry. Without speculation,industry will cause private capital to increase and tend to improve thecondition of Agriculture by freeing the land from indebtedness for loans by theland banks. It is necessary for industry to deplete the land both of labourersand capital, and, through speculations, transfer all the money of the world intoour hands, thereby throwing the Gentiles into the ranks of the proletariat. TheGentiles will then bow before us to obtain the right to existence."

- The Sixth Protocol

9. Bolshevism And Zionism

Communism works in the United Statesthrough precisely the same channels as it used in Russia and through the sameagents – Revolutionary and Predatory Unionism as distinct from Business andUplift Unionism, and Jewish agitators. When Martens, the so-called SovietAmbassador, "left" the United States after being deported, heappointed as the representative of Communism in the United States one CharlesRecht, a Jew, a lawyer by profession, who maintained an office in New York. Thisoffice was the rendezvous of all the Jewish labor union leaders in the city,many of the labor leaders throughout the country, and frequently of Americangovernmental officials and other political leaders known to be the henchmen ofJewish aspirations in the United States and sympathizers with predatoryradicalism. The organization has since spread from coast to coast, from north tosouth. The situation of Communist headquarters in New York was, and is,important because from that center lines of authority and action radiate to allthe other cities of the Union. New York is the laboratory in which theemissaries of revolution learn their lesson, and their knowledge is dailyincreased by the counsel and experience of travelling delegates straight out ofRussia.

American citizens do not realize thatall the public disturbances, labor differences, strikes and political confusionof which they read are not mere sudden outbreaks, but the deliberately plannedmovements of leaders who know exactly what they are doing.

Mobs are methodical; there is alwaysan intelligent core which gets done under the appearance of excitement what hasbeen planned beforehand. Up through the French Revolution, up through the GermanRevolution, up through the Russian Revolution, and the world disorders since,came the previously chosen men, and to this day the groups thus raised to powerhave not lessened their power – and they are Jewish groups. Russia is not moreJewish controlled than France; Germany tried in vain to loosen the grip of Judahfrom her throat. So it is in America.

The first step of the Jewishorganizations supporting Communism in the United States was the control andexpansion of the Hebrew labor movement among the millions of immigrants during50 years; with the view to eventual Jewish control of all labor unions. The Jewshave captured American trade union movements as completely as if they hadstormed them with the bayonet.

There is a mass of moving literature(mostly written by Jews) pretending to describe the glowing hearts with whichthese alien throngs of liberty-loving-democrats, workers’ comrades, look uponAmerica, their intense longing for the "American way of life," theirlove of the people and American institutions. The actions of these people andthe utterances of their leaders all too clearly give the lie to this fairpicture which gullible American Gentiles would fain believe.

The resistance offered to the"American way of life," consisting in the limitations put on theAmericanization program, has been sufficient to convince alert observers that,so far as the Jewish invasion is concerned, it is not their desire to go the wayAmerica is going, but to influence America to go the way they are going.They talk a great deal of what they bring to America but nothing at all of whatthey found there. America is presented to them as a big piece of putty to bemoulded as they desire. "The Melting Pot," a term which the Jewishwriter Zangwill gave currency, is not a dignified name for the Republic, and itis more and more challenged as descriptive of the process that goes on. Thereare some substances in the pot that will not melt; but more significantstill, there are rapidly increasing influences who want to melt the pot!

The two divisions of Jewish wealth andpolitical power are – first, German Jewish, represented by the Schiffs, theSpeyers, the Warburgs, the Kahns, the Lewisohns and the Guggenheims. These playthe game with the aid of the financial resources of the non-Jews. The otherdivision is composed of the Russian and Polish Jews who monopolize the lowerranks of trade and industry. Between them their grip and influence is absolute.They may sometimes have internecine quarrels regarding the division of thespoils, and eager publicists may zealously call attention to these quarrels asevidence of the utter lack of unity among the Jews, but in the Kehillah andelsewhere they understand each other quite well, and on the question of Jew vs."goy" they are indivisibly one.

There is a distinction between whatthis Jewish coalition would do and what it could do, but its willand power never so closely correspond as when the non-Jewish element in thenation is asleep. Never are Jewish will and power so widely divorced as when thenon-Jewish mind is alert. The only thing to fear is not the alert Jew, but theconsequences of sleepiness among the Gentiles. The Jewish program is checkedthe moment it is perceived and identified.

Jewish-Red-Links

There are more Communists in theUnited States than there are in Soviet Russia. Their aim is the same and theirracial character is the same. If they have not yet been able to do in Americawhat they have done in Eastern Europe, it is because of the greaterdissemination of information, the higher degree of intelligence, andparticularly the wider diffusion of the agencies of government, than everobtained in Russia and Eastern Europe. The power house of Communist influenceand propaganda in the United States is in the Jewish trade unions which, almostwithout exception, adhere to a Bolshevik program for the respective industriesand for the country as a whole. The fact proves most embarrassing to the Jewishleaders in the recognized political parties very frequently. It is bad enoughthat Russian Bolshevism, Communism, should be so predominantly Jewish, but toconfront the same situation in the United States is a problem whichJewish leaders have to use much ingenuity and deception to explain away oravoid. Yet the International Jew of America cannot be absolved from bearing soleresponsibility for it. Russian Bolshevism came out of the East Side of New Yorkwhere it was fostered by the encouragement – the religious, moral andfinancial encouragement – of Jewish leaders.

Leon Trotsky (Braunstein) was an EastSider. The forces which fostered what he stood for centered in the Kehillah andthe American Jewish Committee. Both were interested in the work he set out to do– the overthrow of an established government, one of the allies of the UnitedStates in world war one. Russian Bolshevism was helped to its objective byJewish gold from the United States – and by the ignorance and indolence of theGentile citizens of the United States whose crimes of omission are almost asgrave as those of bolshevik commission.

Now that the influence of Communism isfound to be numerically stronger here than in Russia, the fact causes no littleembarrassment to "patriotic" Jews. The big Jewish labor organizationsare the direct offspring of the Jewish Socialist Bund of Russia. Bundistsswarmed to the United States after the abortive revolution of 1905 at which timethey failed to put Bolshevism over in Russia, and these Bundists gave their timeto the Bolshevising of the Hebrew Trade Unions in America. An Agitation Bureauwas formed which propagated radical Socialism through the medium of the Yiddishlanguage. The Bundists incorporated in 1905 in New York an organization known as"The Workmen’s Circle" and "swelled the ranks of the Jewishtrade unions," to quote the Kehillah’s Register. After a brief attempt topropagate Socialism without reference to the Jewish Question, it was given up,and in 1913 a resolution was adopted declaring that the whole purpose of thework was Jewish. This is attributed, in the Kehillah record, to the spread of"the idea of Jewish nationalism."

What amazes the student of the JewishQuestion in the United States is the stupidity which permitted Jewish Bolshevismto flaunt itself so openly. The only explanation that seems at all adequate isthat the Jews never dreamed that the American people would become sufficientlyawake to challenge them. The occasional exposure of Jewish tactics in Americacomes as a surprise to the Jewish leaders, and is accounted for because they areconfident they have gained too strong a grip on the American mind to make suchchallenges possible.

But, the Jewish leaders must admitthat the Jewish Question does not consist in American citizens uncovering thefacts and helping other citizens to become aware of them; the Jewish Questioninheres in the facts themselves and in Jewish responsibility for the facts.

If it is "anti-Semitism" tosay that Communism in the United States is Jewish, so be it; but to theunprejudiced mind it will look very like Americanism.

Will Jewish Zionism Bring Armageddon?

When the British Army passed intoJerusalem in the memorable capture of the city in 1917, the Protocols went inwith it. A symbolic circle was thus closed, though not in the way theProtocolists had hoped. The man who carried the Protocols knew what theysignified, and they were carried not in triumph but as the plans of the enemiesof world liberty.

Zionism is the best advertised of allpresent Jewish activities and has exerted a greater influence upon world eventsthan the average man realizes. In its more romantic aspects it makes an appealto Christians as well as to Jews, because there are certain prophecies which areheld to concern the return of the Jews to Jerusalem. When this return takesplace, certain great events are scheduled to ensue.

Because of this admixture of the"religious" sentiment, it is sometimes difficult for a certain classof people to scrutinize modern Political Zionism. They have been too wellpropagandized into believing that political Zionism and the "return"promised by the prophets are the same thing. Having succumbed to the initialconfusion of mistaking Judah for Israel they have entirely mistaken the ancientwritings that relate to these two and have made the tribe of Judah (whence comesthe name of Jew) the hub around which all history and humanity swing. Judah wasthe single tribe with which Israel could not live in peace over 2,000 years ago,and which has the beautiful gift of stirring up the same kind of dissensiontoday. Yet no one ever thought of charging the Ten Tribes of Israel with"anti-Semitism."

Zionism is challenging the attentionof the world today because it is creating a situation out of which many believethe next war will come [Editor’s Note: This prophetic paragraph appeared in the"Dearborn Independent," dated May 26, 1921. The conditions andactivities leading up to World War II, and the present world conditions arisingout of the Palestine imbroglio emphasize the prescience of the whole series ofarticles now reproduced in this edited edition.].

To adopt a phraseology familiar tostudents of prophecy, it is believed by many students of world affairs thatArmageddon will be the direct result of what is now beginning to be manifestedin Palestine.

With Zionism as a dream of pious Jewsthis investigation has nothing to do. With Zionism as a political fact, everygovernment is now compelled to have something to do. It is a bigger questionthan any other world question, it lies back of all world problems, large orsmall, national or international, and is rapidly proceeding under cover of manyother interests.

It is worthy of note that Zionism inthe active modern political sense took its rise racially and geographicallywhere Bolshevism arose, namely, in Russia, and that there was always a closerelationship between the Zionists of Russia and the New York Kehillah, as wasevidenced by public utterances made in Russia after the revolution in which theKehillah was extolled.

At the time war was declared in 1914,the Zionist Inner Actions Committee was spread about in various countries. Forexample: Dr. Schmarya Levin, of Berlin, was in the United States and remainedthere. He was a Russian rabbi, German scholar, and cosmopolitan. Although, in1914, the Zionist center and seat of Inner Actions Committee was at Berlin, heremained in the United States and became recognized as the leader of the leadersof Zionism, until the great Jewish shift to Versailles. Another member of theInner Actions Committee was Jacobson, who was in Constantinople.

·        "When he saw thatConstantinople could no longer be a center of Zionist politics, he left and wentto Copenhagen, Denmark, where in a neutral country he could be of practicalusefulness to the Zionists by transmitting information and funds."(Guide to Zionism," page 80).

In fact, the entire Inner ActionsCommittee, with headquarters in Berlin, moved freely through a war-locked world,the only two exceptions being Warburg and Hantke – and there was no need forthe Berlin Warburg to move about, for there were others who represented him.

Dr. Levin gave his sanction for theshifting of the center of Jewish gravity from Berlin to America, and

·        "As early as August 30,1914, a month after the outbreak of war, an extraordinary conference of AmericanZionists was called in New York."

What this change of seat meant, hasformed the subject of much discussion. In 1914 the Jews apparently knew moreabout the probable duration of the Great War than did the principals. It was notto be a mere excursion through Belgium, as some fancied. There was time todicker, time to show the value of certain Jewish support to the governments.Germany gladly pledged the land of Palestine to the Jews, but the Jews hadalready seen what Wilhelm II had done in that ancient country when he enthronedhimself on the Mount of Olives. Evidently the Allies won in the contest ofmaking promises and submissions to Jewry, for on November 2, 1917, when GeneralAllenby was pushing up through Palestine with his British Army, Arthur JamesBalfour, the British Foreign Secretary, issued the famous declaration approvingPalestine as a national home for the Jewish people.

·        "The wording of it camefrom the British Foreign Office, but the text had been revised in the Zionistoffices in America as well as in England. The British Declaration was made inthe form in which the Zionists desired it, and the last clauses were addedin order to appease a certain section of timid anti-Zionist opinion."("Guide to Zionism," pp. 85-86)

Now read the Declaration and note theitalicized clauses just referred to:

"His Majesty’s Government views with favor theestablishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people and wil1 usetheir best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it beingclearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil andreligion rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights andpolitical status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

Zionism is of particular interest, notmerely because of the quarrels which have arisen among the leaders over money– it is the war of "interest" against "capital" – butalso because of the light it throws on the two great armies of Jews in theworld, the way in which they use their power where they can, and the troublethat always embroils the nations which become Jewish tools.

People sometimes ask why Jewry, whichis capitalistic, should favor Bolshevism, which is the announced enemy ofcapital.

It is an interesting question. Whyshould a New York Jewish financier, an officer of the government of the UnitedStates, help finance a "Red" publication which even our tolerantgovernment cannot stomach? In addition to the fact that it is only "Gentilecapital" that is attacked, the answer is that the Jew who has fallen forthe worship of the Golden Calf is anxious to keep in the good graces of the Jewof the East – the Mongolian Jews – who are rampaging against orderly systemsof society. It is quite useful when there is a revolution in Paris to have the600 houses which you may own spared by the incendiary mobs – as wereRothschild’s houses. Zionism has been one of the subjects upon which Westernand Eastern Jews can unite.

Indeed, it was the Eastern Jew thatcompelled the Western Jew to take a favorable stand on this matter. The Jews whoare receiving the freedom of our cities today in their various aspects as"German" and "British" scientists are Eastern Jews. Theyhave come to a contest with the Jews of America on the question of Money. TheJews of America have smothered some very ugly charges. The Jews of the East,more recently of Germany or England, are not likely to be browbeaten by themoney-bags of Jewish New York, for the Eastern type of Jew knows of a stationin which money is the most useless thing in the world – and that is why heis feared and favored by Western Jewry of the Golden Calf.

Cunning Jewish defenders occasionallycapitalize the "split" in Jewry. There is no such thing. The realsplit in Jewry will come if and when Jews of vision begin to support theattempts which have been made to liberate the Jews from their leaders. Thisinternal squabble means nothing but the squabble of leaders; but when the Jewsthemselves divide, one side for twentieth century light and the destruction ofthe power of selfish leaders, then we may begin to hope. When the Jew recognizesthe honesty of his critics and the righteousness of what they charge, when theJew advances in civilization then there may be a "split", but notbefore. The division in Jewry as evidenced by the contempt of the revolutionaryparty for the financial party, and as even more strongly evidenced by the fearof the revolutionary party by the financial party, was brought about by theearlier insincerity of the Western Jew’s Zionism. The Western Jew said thatthe United States is the Promised Land, profits and interest are the "milkand honey", and New York is Jerusalem; the Eastern Jew had another view.

A knowledge of Political Zionism isessential also as an authoritative illustration of what the Jew does when he isin power. Heretofore there has been Russia to illustrate this, but now there isPalestine. With every fact against them, with every traveler and observer givingthem the lie direct, there are still Jewish spokesmen and poor befuddled"Gentile fronts," as well as corrupt Gentile politicians and writers,who insist that Communism is not Jewish and that Russia is not governed by Jews.It is just this constant denial of facts, this failure to use their opportunityto be honest, that is going to be the judgment of Jewish leaders. Communism allover the world, not in Russia only, is Jewish.

More to the present point isPalestine, where the unity of revolutionary and financial Jewry is never moreclearly established. It is impossible for the most irresponsible Jewishspokesman to deny that Palestine is Jewish [Editor’s Note: The BritishAdministration in Palatine is referred to at the time the original waswritten.]. The government is Jewish, the plan of procedure is Jewish, themethods used are Jewish. Palestine will do to illustrate the genius of the Jewwhen he comes to power.

Professor Albert T. Clay, in the"Atlantic Monthly" (will anyone declare that thislong-established and thoroughly respectable Boston publication is"anti-Semitic"?) warns us that the information about Palestine whichwe received in America comes to us through the Jewish Telegraph Service (whichis the Associated Press of worldwide Jewry) and the Zionist propaganda."The latter," he says, "with its harrowing stories of pogroms inEurope, and its misrepresentations of the situation in the Near East, has beenable to awaken not a little sympathy for the Zionist propaganda."

This propaganda of pogroms –"thousands upon thousands of Jews killed" – amounts to nothingexcept as it illustrates the gullibility of the Press. No one believes thispropaganda and governments regularly disprove it. But the fact that it continuesindicates that something besides facts is necessary to keep the scheme going. InJerusalem as this is being written (1921: Ed.) martial law is proclaimed. Therehas been a struggle between the native inhabitants, whom the Balfour Declarationsought to protect, and the new-come Jews. The Jews were well armed and thenatives fought with whatever weapons they could find on the spot; the conclusionof all impartial observers being that the Jews prepared for and sought the fightwith unprepared Arabs.

The mark of disorder perpetrated bythe Jews is all over the place, the "persecuted" turned persecutor,and lest this should be charged to the general wildness of the people inPalestine let it be said that the Jewish rioters (most of whom are thugs fromEastern Europe) are only expressing in deeds what the "cultivated"American and English Jews have expressed in words – namely, that the lawfulinhabitants of the land ought to be driven out, in spite of governmentalpromises to the contrary. One of the first rioters during that bloody Easterafter World War I, Jabotinsky, whom the British authorities sentenced to 15years in prison, was released immediately on the arrival of the Jew Sir HerbertSamuel. Jabotinsky was one of the original Russian Bolsheviki come down topractice the gentle arts of that tribe in Palestine. The Government of Palestinesince the British occupation was, and is, Jewish. Sir Herbert Samuel was theBritish High Commissioner, representing the power of the British Governmentwhich took up the Mandate for Palestine. This founded the Jewish power which hasbeen maintained and increased to its present virulent state. The head of thejudicial department was also a Jew. Christian or Moslem judges who did not givethe Jew a shade the better of the proceedings were ousted – a conditionfamiliar in New York. Chaim Weizmann became head of the Department of Works, andlater emerged as the successor to Levin as the leader of Zionism. The Jewishgovernment of the "new Palestine" was very much like that of BolshevikRussia – mostly foreign. Practically every big American city was representedin the first Bolshevik government of Russia. There is another full-fledgedgovernment waiting in America for service whenever necessary.

Land-Grabbing

The methods adopted to get the land ofPalestine away from the Arabs in the early days of the Zionist invasion weresuch as will fill the world with indignation once the world is permitted to knowwhat was done. That it was done with the knowledge and approval of ZionistCommissioner Samuel is indicated by the fact that he suspended the activities ofa British officer who endeavored to stop the abuse. It was the old game oflending money at exorbitant rate of interest to Arabs hard pressed by theravages of war and crop failure, and then seizing their land when they could notpay. The bank that did this was the Anglo-Palestine Bank, a Zionist concern.This British officer, to save the people and the land, made arrangements with aBritish bank to lend them money at 6½% with five years to pay. If paymentfailed, the land was to go to the government for redistribution, not to theZionist bank. This was the humane plan which the Zionist High Commissionerforbade, whereupon the British officer resigned. The well-considered action ofJewry in power.

Then follows what is described byevery impartial observer as an arrogant attempt to expropriate everything insight. The only schools that had been established in Jerusalem had been builtand manned by the Gentiles, although the tiny group of Jews permanently residentin Jerusalem have been the pensioners of world-wide Jewry for centuries. As longago as 1842 Dr. Murray M’Cheyne noted that the Jerusalem Jews cared nothingfor the schools, but Christians with a warm regard for the Holy City set aboutto improve the miserable condition of the Jewish inhabitants. Thus it came thatat the time of the Zionist invasion a considerable number of Jewish childrenwere in attendance at the schools. The new-come Zionist leaders demanded thatthe best of the schools be given up to them. Of course, this was refused."The Council of Jerusalem Jews" then caused it to be published in theHebrew daily that parents who did not withdraw their children from the schoolswould be punished. Now look at the typical punishments threatened:

If any parent refused whose name wason the list of the American Relief Fund, the relief would be withdrawn.

Doctors would be forbidden to visitfamilies that had children attending the enlightened schools.

Their names would be sent to theblack-list at the places where circumcision was performed, so that new borndescendants of the recalcitrants might be refused the rites of Moses.

They would be denied all share inZionist benefits or funds.

If they were in business they would beboycotted.

If they were workmen, they could getno work.

"Anyone who refused, let him knowthat it was forbidden for him to be called by the name of Jew. They will befought by all lawful means. Their names will be put upon a monument of shame andtheir deeds made to reproach them to the last generation. If they are supported,their support will cease. If they are rabbis, they will be removed from office.They shall be put under the ban and persecuted, and all the world will know thatin this justice there has been no mercy."

It is the spirit of Jewish Bolshevismall over again! It is tyranny, not the tyranny of strength, but of meanness anddarkness. It is the spirit which produced the Irgun terrorism, the Jewishhatred, malice and vengeance which lurks for all critics of Jewry and opponentsof Zionist ambitions.

This spirit which obtained at thebeginning of a movement, which the innocent Christian world has been taught bypropaganda to regard as a profoundly religious and respectable exodus, explainsall that has happened in the years since the Zionists took over Palestine. Itstaggers the imagination to forecast what will be done in a period of full andunquestioned rule.

It is very clear that Jewishnationalism will develop along the line of enmity to the rest of the world.

There are three elements of danger inthe situation: the overwhelming predominant Bolshevist element that is beingpoured into Palestine; the intense, egotistic and challenging nationalism thatZionists exhibit even before they get a potato patch – the taste for worldpolitics and world power; and the racial confusion which now exists inPalestine.

These combined are dynamite. The firstis more vital than many realize. The few Jews who have gone to Palestine atgreat sacrifice and for pious reasons are complaining that instead of the Psalmsof David the people are singing songs of the Red Revolution, and instead ofmeeting for instruction and prayer there are riotous gatherings extollingRussian leaders as Messiahs and the Soviet as the Kingdom of Heaven.

Palestine has been called the centerof the earth. The power that controls Palestine controls the world. Althoughexercising no sovereignty over the land itself, Great Britain’s control ofadjacent waters and of Egypt and Persia and India forms the key of her power[Editor’s Note: The "key" has since been given away. It issignificant that the "giving away" of British power in recent yearsshould have the approval of both the Conservative, self-confessed Zionist,Churchill, and British Labor Party. British history since World War I clearlyproves the dominance of Jewish power in that country.]

The white race has thus far been theChosen People to whom dominion of the earth has been given. Palestine is the keyto world military strategy and trade. In question 12 of the Questions andAnswers published by the department of Education, Zionist Organization ofAmerica, this occurs:

·        12. What are the commercialpossibilities of Palestine? The location of Palestine between threecontinents favours foreign trade.

All this lends itself to dreams offuture glory, as do the unlimited mineral and oil resources of Palestineestimated by scientists in astronomical figures.

Many Christian friends of the Jew havepleased themselves by conceiving a universal Hague at Jerusalem and a new socialorder going out to bless the nations from Zion. It is the idea conveyed by menlike A. A. Berle in books like "The World Significance of a JewishState."

Americans do not understand thedelicate racial situation in Palestine. Zionist propaganda has always beenaccepted on the assumption that Palestine is the Jews’ land and that they onlyneed help to go back. It is an historical and political fact that Palestine hasnot been the Jew’s land for more than 2,000 years – and then for only abrief while. At the close of the 1914-1918 war there were in Palestine over600,000 Arabs and only 50,000 Jews. Neither numerically nor industrially havethe Jews held the land. Yet as the result of a "war bargain" it ishanded over to them as regardless of the native inhabitants as if Belgium hadbeen handed over to Mexico. Many of the natives are Semites, like the Jews, butthey do not want the Jews among them. The Balfour Declaration, as well as theterms of the Mandate, recognized the rights of the native races. Everyone whoknows about the people who have been native to Palestine for thousands of yearsrecognizes their right, everybody except the Jews.

It is now that the last clauses, addedas the Zionist historian declares, "in order to appease a certain sectionof timid anti-Zionist opinion," begin to get a meaning for the reader.

Was the purpose only to quietdisturbing questions until all the arrangements were made? Evidently. It wasthen a dishonest appeasement! Such may have been the Zionists’ intention, butno one expects perjury on the part of the responsible nations.

General Allenby promised the nativeArabs of Palestine that their rights would be respected. So did the BalfourDeclaration. So did the San Remo Conference. So also did President Wilson in thetwelfth of his Fourteen Points.

But Judah says, "Let them getout!" "The last clauses were added in order to appease a certainsection of timid anti-Zionist opinion." "Let them give up their landto us, we want it!" The delightful Jewishness of it! The watchmen on thetowers of the world are alarmed at what is brewing in Judah’s cauldron.

__________________________________________________________

"To wear everyone out bydissensions, animosities, feuds, famine, inoculation of diseases, want, untilthe Gentiles see no other way of escape except an appeal to our money andpower."

- The Tenth Protocol

10. Jewish Supremacy In The Theatre And Cinema

The Theater has long been a part ofthe Jewish program for the guidance of public taste and the influencing of thepublic mind. Not only is the theater given a special place in the program of theProtocols, but it is the instant ally night by night and week by week of anyidea which the "power behind the scenes" wishes to put forth. It isnot by accident that in Russia, where they now have scarcely anything else, theystill have the Theater, specially revived, stimulated and supported byJewish-Bolshevists because they believe in the Theater just as they believe inthe Press; it is one of the two great means of molding popular opinion.

Not only the "legitimate"stage, so-called, but the motion picture industry – the fifth greatest of allindustries – is also entirely Jew-controlled; with the natural sequence thatthe civilized world is increasingly antagonistic to the trivializing anddemoralizing influence of that form of entertainment as at present managed.

As soon as the Jew gained control ofAmerican liquor, we had a liquor problem with drastic consequences. As soon asthe Jew gained control of the "movies" we had a movie problem, theconsequences of which are visible.

It is the peculiar genius of that raceto create problems of a moral character in whatever business they achieve amajority [Editor’s Note: Writing in the London "Jewish Chronicle,"August 6, 1948, a Jewish correspondent (Americanus) admits: "Most of thepersons who have cudgelled their wits over the problem, have neglected one ofthe most oblivious impacts on American life Jews have made; in the massentertainment media – radios, films, the stage, night clubs. One might almostsay that American culture as a whole has taken on certain Jewishovertones."]

Every night hundreds of thousands ofpeople give from two to three hours to the Theater, every day literally millionsof people give up from 30 minutes to 3 hours to the "Movies"; and thissimply means that millions of Americans every day place themselves voluntarilywithin range of Jewish ideas of life, love and labor; within close range ofJewish propaganda, sometimes cleverly, sometimes clumsily concealed. This givesthe Jewish masseur of the public mind all the opportunity he desires; and hisonly protest now is that exposure may make his game a trifle difficult.

The Theater is not only Jewish on itsmanagerial side, but also on its literary and professional side. More and moreplays are appearing whose author, producer, star and cast are entirely Jewish(vaudeville-music hall-performers are predominantly Jewish). They are not greatplays, they do not last long. This is natural enough, since the Jewishtheatrical interests are not seeking artistic triumphs, they are not seeking theglory of the American stage, nor are they striving to develop great actors.Their interest is solely financial and racial. There is a tremendous Judaizingmovement on. The work is almost complete. The American feel, has gone outof the Theater; a dark, Oriental atmosphere has come instead.

Down to 1885 the American Theater wasstill in the hands of the Gentiles; from that year dates the first invasion ofJewish influence. This date almost coincides with the beginning of theorganization and coordination of the Jewish world scheme for domination calledZionism, and this year marks not only the beginning of the Jewish wedge ofcontrol, but something far more important.

It is not important that theater andmusic hall managers are now Jews whereas they were formerly Gentiles. Theimportance begins with the fact that with the change of managers there came alsoa decline in the art and morals of the stage, and that this decline becameaccelerated as the Jewish control became widespread. Jewish control means thateverything has been deliberately and systematically squeezed out of the AmericanTheater except its most undesirable elements and these undesirable elements havebeen exalted to the highest place of all. The Great Age of the American Theateris past, the Great Actors have passed, and they have left no successors. AHebrew hand fell on the stage, and the natural genius of the stage was notwelcome. A new form of worship was to be established.

"Shakespeare spells ruin,"was the utterance of a Jewish manager. "High-brow stuff" (meaninganything not salacious) is also a Jewish expression. These two savings, oneappealing to the managerial end, the other to the public end of the Theater,have formed the epitaph of the classic era.

The present-day average intelligenceappealed to in the Theater does not rise above 13 to 18 years. "The tiredbusiness man" stuff (another Jewish expression) has treated thetheater-going public as if it were composed of morons. The appeal is frankly toa juvenile type of mind which can easily be moulded to the ideas of the Hebraictheatrical monopoly.

Clean, wholesome, constructive plays– the few that remain – are supported mainly by the rapidly vanishing raceof theatergoers who survive from an earlier day, and by those younger peoplewhose minds have been shielded by these survivors from the contamination of theJewish theater.

The great majority of the presentgeneration has been educated to support plays of an entirely different type.Tragedy is taboo; the play of character, with a deeper significance than woulddelight the mind of a child, is out of favor; The comic opera has degeneratedinto a flash of color and movement – a combination of salacious farce and jazzmusic, supplied by a Jewish songwriter (the great purveyor of jazz) and the rageis for extravaganza and burlesque. The bedroom farce has been exalted into thefirst place, the historical drama has given way to fleshly spectacles set offwith overpowering scenic effects, the principal component of which is an army ofgirls whose drapery does not exceed five ounces in weight.

Frivolity, sensuality, indecency,appalling illiteracy and endless platitude are the marks of the degenerateAmerican Theater under Jewish control.

That, of course, is the real beginningof all the "Little Theater" movements which have begun in so manycities and towns in the United States. The art of the drama, having been drivenout of the theater by the Jews, is finding a home in thousands of study circlesthroughout the country. The people cannot see real plays; therefore, they readthem. The plays that are acted cold not be read at all, for the most part, anymore than the words of the jazz songs can be read; they don’t mean anything.The people who want to see real plays and cannot, because Jewish managerswon’t produce them, are forming little dramatic clubs of their own, in barnsand churches and schools. The drama fled from exploiters and has found a homewith its friends.

Mechanics And Fake "Stars"

The major changes which the Jews havemade in the theater are four in number. First, they have elaborated themechanical side, making human talent and genius less necessary. They have madethe stage "realistic" instead of interpretative. Great actors neededvery little machinery; the men and women on the payrolls of the Jewish managersare helpless without machinery. The outstanding fact about the vast majority ofpresent day performances of any pretension is that the mechanical past dwarfsand obscures the acting; and this is the reason knowing – that the Jewishpolicy is death to talent, the Jewish producer prefers to put his faith and hismoney in wood, canvas, paint, cloth and tinsel. Wood and paint never showcontempt for his sordid ideals and his betrayal of his trust. Thus we have inthe theater today dazzling effects of light and motion – but no ideas. A greatmany stage employees, but no actors, drills and dances without end, but nodrama. The Jew has put in the glitter but he has taken out the profounder ideas.Second, the Jews have introduced Oriental sensuality to the stage. The mark ofthe filthy tide has risen until it has engulfed the whole theater. In New York,where Jewish managers are thicker than they ever will be in Jerusalem, the limitof theatrical adventures into the realm of the forbidden is being pushed furtherand further. The sale of narcotics is illegal, but the instilling of moralpoison is not. The whole atmosphere of "cabaret" and "midnightfrolic" entertainment is of Jewish origin and importation. Montmarte hasnothing at all in the nature of lascivious entertainment that New York cannotduplicate. But, neither New York nor any other American city has that ComedieFrancaise which strives to counterbalance the evil of cosmopolitan Paris.Where have the writers for the Stage a single chance in this welter ofsensuousness? Where have the actors of tragic or comic talent a chance insuch productions? It is the age of the chorus girl, a voluptuous creature whosemental caliber has nothing to do with the concern of drama, and whose stage lifecannot in the very nature of things be a career.

A third consequence of Jewishdomination of the American stage has been the appearance of the "Star"system, with its advertising appliances. The Theater is swamped in numerous"stars" that never really rose and certainly never shone, but whichwere hoisted high on the advertising walls of the Jewish theatrical syndicatesin order to give the public the impression that these feeble lanternlights werein the highest heaven of dramatic achievement. The trick is a department storetrick. It is sheer advertising strategy. Whereas in normal times adiscriminating public made the "star" by their acclaim, nowadays theJewish managers determine by their advertisements who the star shall be.

The Jews seeks immediate success inall but racial affairs. In the breakdown of the Gentile theater, success cannotbe too swift for him. The training of artists takes time. It is far simpler tohave the advertisement bills, the venal critics of the Press, serve as asubstitute. The Jewish manager of the day diverts attention from the dramaticpoverty of the theater by throwing confetti, limbs, lingerie and spanglesdazzingly into the eyes of his audience.

Rise Of The Jewish Theatrical Trust

These three disastrous results ofJewish control of the Theater are all explained by a fourth; the secret of thechange is found in the Jewish passion to commercialize everything it touches.The focus of attention has been shifted from the Stage to the box office. Thebanal policy of "give the public what they want" is the policy of thepanderer and not that of creative genius. It entered the theater with the firstJewish invasion in 1885, when two alert Jews established in New York a so-calledbooking-agency and offered to take over the somewhat cumbersome system by whichmanagers of theaters in the big but distant towns in the country arrangedengagements for the ensuing season. The old process involved extensivecorrespondence with producing managers in the East and many local managers wereobliged to spend several months in New York to make up a season’s bookings.The advantages of a central booking concern relieved local managers of muchtime, labor and thought, all details were handled for him and his nextseason’s bookings were arranged for him. In this manner was laid thefoundation of the later day Theatrical Trust. The booking firm which gave birthto the iron control of the theater was that of Klaw & Erlanger. This is thekey to the whole problem of the decline of the American stage. The rise of theTheatrical Trust completed the destruction of the personal touch in theirrelationship between manager and company. The old "personal" systemmade possible the development of genius in accordance with the organic lawswhich determine its nurture, growth and fruition.

The fact of Jewish control of thetheater is not itself a ground for complaint. If certain Jews working separatelyor in groups have succeeded in wrenching this rich business from its formerGentile control, that is purely a matter of commercial interest. It is preciselyon the same footing as if one group of Gentiles had won the control from anothergroup of Gentiles. In this, as in other bushiness matters, however, there is theethical test of how the control was gained and how it is used.Society is usually willing to receive the fact of control with equanimity,providing the control is not used for anti-social purposes.

The fact that the old-time Gentileproducing managers usually died poor while Jewish producing managers waximmensely rich would indicate that the Gentile managers were better artists andpoorer business men than the Jewish managers. At least poorer business men,perhaps; and in any case working on a system whose chief object was to produceplays not merely profits.

The advent of Jewish control put thetheater on a more commercialized basis than it had previously known. It reallyrepresented applying the Trust Idea of the theater before it had been largelyapplied to industry.

The early control of theaters instrategic cities, the block booking agencies for artists and productions, andthe running out of business of the independent theaters and stock companies byexcessive charges for plays that had already been used in the regular theatersof the Trust, really served Jewish interests in another way. The motion pictureindustry was coming to the front. It was a Jewish enterprise from the first.There was never any need to drive the Gentiles out of that, because the Gentilesnever had a chance to get it. Thus the driving out of the independent theatermanager and the stock companies threw the empty theaters over to the"movies" and the benefit was again confined to a racial group.

The Theatrical Trust, which began asJewish, was at the beginning of the beginning of the twentieth century in fullcontrol of the field. It reduced what was essentially an art to a time-clock,cash-register system, working with the precision of a well-controlled factory.It suppressed individuality, initiative, killed off competition, drove out theindependent manager and the natural genius, excluded all but foreign playwrightsof established reputations, fostered the popularity of inferior talent which waspredominantly Jewish, foisted cordless "stars" of mushroom growth upona helpless public while driving real artists into obscurity; it handled plays,theaters and actors like factory products and began a process of vulgarizing andcommercializing everything connected with the theater.

Critics "Controlled"

It is quite possible that many whoread this are not interested in the theater, and are, in fact, convinced thatthe theater and cinema are a menace. But, what principally makes these things amenace? This – that the stage and cinema today represent the principalcultural element of 90 per cent of the people. What the average young personabsorbs as to good form, proper deportment, refinement as contrasted wittycoarseness, correctness of speech or choice of words, customs and feelings ofother nations, fashion of clothes, ideas of religion and law, are derived fromwhat is seen at the cinema and theater. The masses’ sole idea of home and lifeof the rich is derived from the stage and the movies.

More wrong notions are given, moreprejudices created by the Jewish controlled theater-cinema in one week than canbe charged against a serious study of the Jewish-Question in a century. Peoplesometimes wonder where the ideas of the younger generation come from – this isthe answer.

The Jewish control of the public mindwas not gained without opposition, but one by one the defenders of the Americantradition were beaten or surrendered to overwhelming influences. The JewishTheatrical Trust was attacked by the Editor of the New York "DramaticMirror" as far back as December 25, 1897. He was the famous dramaticcritic Harrison Grey Fiske. He wrote:

·        "What then should beexpected of a band of adventurers of infamous origin, of no breeding and utterlywithout artistic taste? Let it be kept in mind that the ruling number of thesemen who compose the Theatrical Trust are absolutely unfit to serve in any butthe most subordinate places in the economy of the stage, and that they ought notto be tolerated even in these places except under a discipline, active, vigorousand uncompromising. Their records are disreputable and in some cases criminal,and their methods are in keeping with their records."

Fiske’s article was reprinted inMarch, 1898. The Jews, of course, acted as one man as is always the case whenone Jew is censured for wrong doing or when one group of Jews is exposed formalpractices. All the Jews in the United States came to the rescue of theTheatrical Trust. Pressure was brought to bear on news companies which handledthe circulation of magazines in the United States. Leading hotels were inducedto withdraw the "Dramatic Mirror" from their news stands."Mirror" correspondents were refused admittance to theaters controlledby the Trust. Any number of underground influences were set in operation to"get" Fiske and his business [Editor’s Note: These counter-measuresof over 50 years ago in America are readily recognized by alert observers of thepresent day, when any form of criticism of a Jew or group of Jews is expressed;if anything the weapons used to silence critics are more powerful, because Jewryhas become more powerful.].

Libel suits were brought against Fiskefor gigantic damages for the strictures he had printed upon the personalcharacters of members of the Trust. For once the Trust members came off badly.They were revealed to be a much lower type of men than the American public hadsupposed was in charge of the American theater.

The fight of the dramatic critics,first against the bribery and then against the bludgeoning of the TheatricalTrust makes a story of which echoes have frequently come to the public throughthe Press. Conciliatory at first, with managers, actors, playwrights andcritics, the Trust, as soon as it gained power, showed its claws beneath thevelvet. It had millions of dollars of the public coming its way, why should itcare? Whenever a critic opposed its methods or pointed out the interior, coarseand degrading character of the Trust productions, he was barred from theTrust’s theaters, and local managers were instructed to demand his dischargefrom his newspaper. In almost every case the demand was complied with, thepapers being threatened with the loss of advertising. In all the years since theTrust has hounded and black-listed critics who tell the truth and have preventedtheir employment by newspaper [Editor’s Note: Since the original"Dearborn Independent" articles were published the critics andcolumnists of the Americana Press have become predominantly Jewish, or Jewishcontrolled].

The rage of the day is not plays butplayhouses. The theatrical business entered upon its real estate phase with thecoming of the Trust. There is money in renting chairs at the rate of 1 to 3dollars an hour. The renting of chairs is a reality. The Stage has become anillusion, since it came under the influence and control of a Group of formerbootblacks, newsboys, ticket speculators, prize ring habitues, and Bowerycharacters.

The public does not see and does notknow these gods before whom they pour their millions yearly, nor does the publicknow from what source theatrical vileness comes. It is painful to listen tofledgling philosophers discuss the "tendencies of the stage," orexpiate learnedly on the "divine right of Art," to be as flippant andfilthy as it pleases, when all the time the "tendency" and"art" is determined by men whose antecedents would make Art scream.

The Theatrical Trust does not exist inthe form it did ten years ago; it grew, arrogant and bred secret enemies amongits own people. A new force arose, but it was also Jewish. Instead of one, theAmerican people now have a dual dictatorship of the stage.

It is perfectly natural that thecomplete Judaization of the theater should result in its being transformed intothe "show business," a mere matter of trade and barter. The producersare often not equipped culturally for anything more than the baldest business.They can hire what they want, mechanics, costumers, painters, writers,musicians. With their gauge of public taste and their model of action formedupon the race track and the prize ring; with their whole ideal modelled upon theambition to pander to depravity, instead of serving legitimate needs, it is notsurprising that the standards of the Theater should now be at their lowest mark.

The Jewish manager whenever possibleemploys Jewish actors and actresses. Gentile playwrights and actors are steadilydiminishing in number for want of a market. The "cover name" concealsfrom the public that the actors and actresses who purvey"entertainment" are, in large and growing proportion, Jewish.

The All-Jewish "Movies"

Jews did not invent the art of motionpicture photography; they have contributed next to nothing to its mechanical ortechnical improvement; they have not produced any of the great artists, eitherwriters or actors, which have furnished the screen with its genuine material.Motion photography, like most other useful things in the world is of non-Jewishorigin. But by the singular destiny which has made the Jews the greatestcream-skimmers of the world, the benefit of it has not gone to the originators,but to the usurpers, the exploiters.

When millions of people crowd throughthe doors of the movie houses at all hours of the day and night, literally anunending line of human beings in every habitable comer of the land, it is worthknowing who draws them there, who acts on their minds while they quiescentlywait in the darkened theater, and who really controls the massive bulk of humanforce and ideas generated and directed by the suggestion of the screen.

Who stands at the apex of thismountain of control? It is stated in the sentence: The motion picture influenceof the United States, of the whole world, is exclusively under the control,moral and financial, of the Jewish manipulators of the public mind.

The moral side of the movies’influence is now a world problem. Everybody who has an active moral senseis convinced as to what is being done and as to what ought to be done. It is abusiness that frankly brutalizes taste and demoralizes morals and should not bepermitted to be a law unto itself. But the propaganda side of the movies doesnot so directly declare itself to the public. That the movies are recognized asa tremendous propagandist institution is proved by the eagerness of all sorts ofcauses to enlist them. There is ample evidence that the Jewish promoters havenot overlooked that end of it. This propaganda as at present observed may bedescribed under the following heads: It consists in silence about the Jew as anordinary being. Jews are not shown upon the stage and screen except in unusuallyfavorable situations. This ill-concealed propaganda of the Jewish movie picturecontrol is also directed against non-Jewish religions. A Jewish rabbi is neverdepicted on the screen in any but the most honorable attitude. He is clothedwith all the dignity of his office and he is made as impressive as can be.Christian clergymen, as any movie "fan" will readily recall, are oftensubjected to all sorts of misrepresentation, from the comic to the criminal.This attitude is distinctly Jewish. Like many unlabelled influences in our life,whose sources lead back to Jewish groups, the object is to break down as far aspossible all respectful or considerate thought about the clergy.

The Catholic clergy very soon madethemselves felt in opposition to this abuse of their priestly dignity, and as aresult it of their vigorous resentment the Jew climbed down. You now never see apriest made light of on the screen. But the Protestant clergyman is still theelongated, snivelling, bilious hyprocrite of anti-Christian caricatures. He ismade to justify his deeds by appeals to "broad" principles – whichreally kills two birds with one stone; it degrades the representative ofreligion in the eyes of the audience, and at the same time it insidiouslyinoculates the audience with the same dangerous ideas. A Hebrew may not bedepicted on the screen as the owner of a sweat shop – though all sweat shopowners are Jews; but you may make a Christian clergyman anything front a seducerto a safe-cracker – and get away with it. Remembering what is written in theProtocols, a question arises. It is written:

·        "We have misled,stupefied and demoralized the youth of the Gentiles by means of education inprinciples and theories, patently false to us, but which we have inspired."Protocol 9

·        "We havetaken good care long ago to discredit the Gentile clergy." Protocol 17

·        "It is for this reasonthat we must undermine faith, eradicate from the minds of the Gentiles the veryprinciples of God and Soul, and replace these conceptions by mathematicalcalculations and material desires." Protocol 4

Two possible views are open to choice:one, that this caricature of representatives of religion is simply that naturalexpressions of a worldly state of mind; the other, that it is part of atraditional campaign of subversion. The former is the natural view amonguninformed people. It would be the preferable view, if peace of mind were theobject sought. But there are far too many indications that the second view isjustified, to permit of its being cast aside.

The screen, whether consciously orjust carelessly, is serving as a rehearsal stage for scenes of anti-socialmenace. There are no uprisings of revolution except those that are planned andrehearsed. Revolutions are not spontaneous uprisings, but carefully plannedminority actions. There have been few popular revolutions. Civilization andliberty have always been set back by those revolutions which subversive elementshave succeeded in starting. Successful revolution must have a rehearsal. It canbe done better in the motion picture than anywhere else: this is the"visual education" such as even the lowest brow can understand.Indeed, there is a distinct disadvantage in being "high brow" in suchmatters. Normal people shake their heads and pucker their brows and wring theirhands saying, "We cannot understand it." Of course, they cannot. Butif they understood the low-brow, they would understand it, and very clearly.There are two families in this world, and on one the darkness dwells.

Reformers, of course, heartily agreewith this as far as criminal portrayals are concerned. Police protest againstthe technique of killing a policeman being shown with careful detail on thescreen. Business men object to daily lessons in safe-cracking being given in thepictures. Moralists object to the art of seduction being made the stock motif nomatter what the subject. They object because they recognize it as evil schoolingwhich bears bitter fruits in society. This kind of "visual education"is going on; there is now nothing connected with violent outbreaks which has notbeen put into the hands of millions by the agency of the motion pictures. It maybe, of course, a mere coincidence. But coincidences are also realities.

There are other developments inscreendom which are worthy of mention. One is the increasing use of non-Jewishauthors to produce Jewish propaganda. Popular non-Jewish authors’ books havebeen screened by Jewish producers and they are more effective as such propagandabecause they are backed by non-Jewish names famous in the literary world. Howmuch of it is due to the authors’ desire to enter the field of pro-Semiticpropaganda, and how much of it is due to their [Editor’s Note: This has beenamply proved in the use made of the cinema to foment the 1939 war, and tointensify the hatreds and spread the malicious lies that grew out of that war.]reluctance to refuse amiable suggestions from movie magnates who have alreadypaid them liberal sums and are likely to pay them more, is another question.

With the "movie bug" sorampant in the country, it is next to impossible to supply enough good picturesfor the stimulated and artificial demand. Some people’s appetite calls for twoor more pictures a day. Shallow pated women see them in the afternoon andseveral more at night. With all the brains and skill of the county engaged onthe task it would be impossible to supply a fresh drama or comedy of quality,hot out of the studios every hour, like bread. Where the Jewish controllers haveoverstepped themselves is here: they have overstimulated a demand which they arenot able to supply, except with such material as is bound to destroy the demand.Nothing is more dangerous to the social value of the motion picture businessthan an exaggerated appetite for them, and this appetite is whetted andencouraged until it becomes a mania.

 [Editor’s Note: These views on Jewish influence in theUnited States were, of course, published before the remarkable development oftelevision, and radio. While that mighty influence is not mentioned in thesepages concerning Jewish activities in the United States, it should be added thatJewish control, from the manufacturing to the performing end, is as effective asin other American businesses. Radio-television, as a force in the world-programoutlined in this series of articles, probably now takes the first place in theJewish scheme of things.]

 _______________________________________________________

"In order not to destroyprematurely the Gentile institutions, we have laid our efficient hands on them,and rasped the springs of their mechanisms They were formerly in strict and justorder, but we have replaced them with a liberal disorganized and arbitraryadministration. We have tampered with jurisprudence, the franchise, the press,freedom of the person, and, most important of all, education and culture, thecornerstone of free existence.

"We have misled, stupefied anddemoralized the youth of the Gentiles by means of education in principles andtheories patently false to us, but which we have inspired.

"Above existing laws, withoutactual change but by distorting them through contradictory interpretations, wehave created something stupendous in the way of results."

- The Ninth Protocol

11. Jewish Jazz Becomes Our National Music

Many people have wondered whence comethe waves upon waves of musical slush that invade decent homes and set the youngpeople of this generation imitating the drivel of morons. Popular music is aJewish monopoly. Jazz is a Jewish creation. The mush, slush, the slysuggestion, the abandoned sensuousness of sliding notes, are of Jewish origin.

Monkey talk, jungle squeals, gruntsand squeaks and gasps suggestive of calf love are camouflaged by a few feverishnotes and admitted in homes where the thing itself, unaided by "cannedmusic," would be stamped out in horror. The fluttering music sheetsdisclose expressions taken directly from the cesspools of modern capitals, to bemade the daily slang, the thoughtlessly hummed remarks of school boys and girls.

Is it surprising that whichever wayyou turn to trace the harmful streams of influence that flow through society,you come upon a group of Jews? In baseball corruption – a group of Jews. Inexploitative finance – a group of Jews. In theatrical degeneracy – a groupof Jews. In liquor propaganda – a group of Jews. In control of national warpolicies – a group of Jews. In control of the Press through business andfinancial pressure – a group of Jews. War profiteers, 80 per cent of them –Jews. Organizers of active opposition to Christian laws and customs – Jews.

In this miasma of so-called popularmusic, which combines weak-mindedness with every suggestion of lewdness –again Jews.

The Jewish influences on Americanmusic is without doubt regarded as serious by those who know anything about it.Not only is there a growing protest against the Judaization of our few greatorchestras, but there is a strong reaction from the racial collusion which fillsthe concert stage and popular platform with Jewish artists to the exclusion ofall others. If they were superior artists, nothing against it could be said;they are only better known and racially favored in Jewish musical circles.

"Let me make a nation’s songsand I care not who makes the laws." said one; in this country the Jews havehad a very large hand in making both. It is the purpose of this article to putpeople in possession of the truth concerning the moron music which theyhabitually hum and sing and shout day and night, and if possible to help them tosee the invisible Jewish baton which is waved above them for financial andpropaganda purposes. Just as the American stage and motion picture have fallenunder the control of Jews and their art-destroying commercialism, so thebusiness of handling "popular songs" has become a Yiddish industry.The Jews who captured it in the early days of exploitation were for the mostpart Russian-born Jews, some of whom had personal pasts which were as unsavoryas the past of many Jewish theatrical and movie leaders have been exposed to be.

In the early 1920’s, Irving Berlin,Leo Feist and other officers of seven music publishing corporations in New York,were charged with violating the Sherman anti-Trust law in a suit brought by theUnited States Government. The defendants, it was alleged, controlled 80% of theavailable copyrighted songs used by manufacturers of phonographs, player pianorolls and other musical reproducing instruments, and fixed prices at which therecords or rolls were to be sold to the public. The corporations involved in theaction were the Consolidated Music Corporation; Irving Berlin, Inc.; Francis,Day and Hunter, Inc.; Shaniro, Bernstein & Co.; Watterson, Berlin &Snyder, Inc.; and M. Witmark & Sons, Inc.; – all of New York. Theagreement which the United States Government sought to disolve was alleged toprovide that the defendants would make contracts only through the ConsolidatedMusic Corporation which they had organized. The other 20% of the song businesswas controlled by other Jewish music houses not included in that special group.

How The Jewish Song Trust Makes You Sing

Jews did not create the popular song;they debased it. The time of the entry of Jews into control of the popular songis the exact time when the morality of popular songs began to decline. The"popular" song, before it became a Jewish industry, was reallypopular. The people sang it and had no reason to conceal it. The popular songtoday is often so questionable a composition that performers with a vestige ofdecency must appraise their audience before they sing. Citizens of adult agewill remember the stages through which the popular song has passed during recentdecades. War songs persisted after the Civil War and were gradually intermingledwith songs of a later time, picturesque, romantic, clean. The same and similarsongs and ballads had a brief revival during World War I. These were not theproduct of song-factories, but the creations of individuals whose gifts weregiven natural expression. These individuals did not work for combines ofpublishers but for the satisfaction of their work, for individual artists of themusic-hall stage. There were no great fortunes made out of songs but there weremany satisfactions in having pleased the public taste. The public taste, likeevery other taste, craves what it is given most to feed upon. Publictaste is public habit. The public is blind to the source of that upon which itlives, and it adjusts itself to the supply. Public taste is raised or lowered asthe quality of its pabulum improves or degenerates.

In a quarter of a century, given allthe avenues of publicity like theater, movie, popular song, newspapers and radio– in the meantime having thrown the mantle of contempt over all counter-activemoral agencies – you can turn out nearly the kind of public you want. It takesjust about a quarter of a century to do the job.

In other days the people sang as theydo now but not in such doped fashion nor with such bewildered continuity. Theysang because they wished to, not as an uncontrolled habit. They sang songsnonsensical, sentimental, heroic, but the "shady" songs were outlawed.The old songs come readily back to memory. Though years have intervened sincethey were the fashion, yet their quality was such that they do not die. Thepopular song of last month – who knows its name? But there are songs of longago whose titles are familiar even to those who have not sung them. What margindid these songs leave for the suggestive and for the unwholesomely emotional?Sentiment was not lacking, but it was unobjectionable sentiment. Then came theJews; the popular song underwent a change. An entirely new crop of titlesappeared dealing with an entirely different series of subjects than the songsthey displaced. Talented singers, tuneful singing vanished. The Jew and theAfrican period, being the entrance of the jungle motif, the so-called"Congo" stuff, and other compositions which swiftly degenerated into arather more bestial type than the beasts themselves arrive at. Running alongsidethis swamp strain was the "ragtime" style of music which was adevelopment of the legitimate Negro minstrelsy. Lyrics disappeared before thenumerous "cake-walk" songs that deluged the public ear. Seductivesyncopation swamped the harmony of the real song. Minstrelsy took on a new life;glamorous youths mutter dirges in low monotones, voluptuous females with grosslyseductive gestures moan nasal notes no real musician can recognize. "Pianoacts" were made the rage; "jazz bands" made their appearance. Byinsensible gradations now easily traceable through the litter of songs withwhich recent decades are strewn, we have been able to see the decline in thepopular song supply. Sentiment has been turned into sensuous suggestion. Romancehas been turned into eroticism. The popular musical lilt slid into ragtime andragtime has been superseded by jazz and crooning. Song topics became lower andlower until at last they are the dredges of the slimy bottom of the underworld.

The first self-styled "King ofJazz" was a Jew named "Frisco." The general directors of thewhole downward trend have been Jews. It needed just their touch of cleverness tocamouflage the moral filth and raise it half a degree above that natural stagewhere it begets nothing but disgust.

Plagiarism

In this business of making thepeople’s songs the Jews have shown as usual, no originality but muchadaptability – which is a charitable term used to cover plagiarism, which inits turn politely covers the crime of mental pocket-picking The Jews do notcreate; they take what others have done, give it a clever twist, and exploit it.Plagiarism is the result of mediocre artists being spurred on by non-artisticpromoters to produce something that can be dressed up with sufficientattractiveness to draw the public’s money. The Jews bought up all the old songbooks, opera scores, collections of folk songs, and, if you stop to analyze someof the biggest "hits" of the early days of the Yiddish songmanufacturing Trust, you will find they are woven on the motif and melody of theclean songs of the pre-swamp era. The music jazzed and swung out of recognition,the sentiment sensualized very much, and pushed upon their smutty road acrossthe world. Because of absolute Jewish control of the song market, both inpublishing and in theatrical performance, it is next to impossible for anythingbut a Jewish song to be published in the United States, or if published, to geta hearing. The proof of this is in the fact that the Yiddish trust owns all thebusiness and the so-called "song-hits" all bear Jewish names.

The insidiousness of the Jewish menaceto our artistic integrity is due partly to the speciousness, the superficialcharm and oriental persuasiveness of Hebrew art, its glitter, its violentlyjuxtaposed extremes of passion, its poignant eroticism and pessimism, and partlyto the fact that the strain in us which might make head against it, the deepest,most fundamental strain in our nature is diluted and confused by a hundred othertendencies of the Jewish age. The Anglo-Saxon group of qualities and the Anglo-Saxon point of view, are the vital nucleus of the American temper. The Jewishdomination of our music threatens to submerge and stultify them at every point.

Tin-Pan-Alley

America does not sing what it likes, but what thevaudeville "song-pluggers" popularize by repeated renditions, untilthe flabby minds of the audiences begin to repeat it on the streets. The"song-pluggers" of theater, vaudeville and radio, are the paid agentsof the Yiddish song agencies. Money, and not merit, dominates the spread of themoron music which is styled Jewish jazz and swing. Non-Jewish music isstigmatized as "4high-brow." The people are fed from day to day on themoron suggestiveness that flows in a slimy flood out of"Tin-Pan-Alley," the head factory of filth in New York which ispopulated by the "Abies," the "Izzies," and the"Moes" who make up the composing staffs of the various institutions."Tin-Pan-Alley" is the name given to the region in Twenty-eighthstreet, between Broadway and Sixth Avenue, where the first Yiddish songmanufacturers began business. Flocks of young girls who thought they could sing,and others who thought they could write song poems, came to the neighborhoodallured by the dishonest advertisements that promised more than the buddingYiddish promoters could fulfill. Needless to say, scandal became rampant, as italways does when so-called "Gentile" girls are reduced to thenecessity of seeking favors from the Jew. It was the constant shouting ofvoices, the hilarity of "parties," the banging of pianos and theblaring of trombones that gave the district the name of"Tin-Pan-Alley." All America is now one great Tin-Pan-Alley, itsentertainment, its youth, its politics, a blare of moronic Judaism.

The diabolical cunning with which anunclean atmosphere is created and sustained through all classes of society andby the same influence, will not be overlooked by any observer. There issomething Satanic about it, something calculated with demonic shrewdness.

And the stream flows on and on,growing worse and worse, to the degradation of the non-Jewish public and theincrease of Jewish fortunes.

Ministers, educators, reformers,parents, citizens are amazed at the growth of looseness among the people, andrail at the evil results. They see the evil product and they attack the product.They rail at the young people who go in for this eroticism and suggestiveness.They deplore the sexual license, the delinquency and the infantilism of theyounger people. But all this has a source! Why not attack the source? When anation is bathed in sights, sounds and ideas of a certain character, drenched inthem and drowned in them, by systematic, deliberate, organized intent, the pointof attack should be the cause, not the effect.

Yet, that is precisely where the pointof attack has not been made, presumably because of lack of knowledge, possiblybecause of fear.

It is little use blaming the people.The people are what they are made. Give the liquor business full sway and youhave a population that drinks and carouses. The population could be turned intodrug addicts if the same freedom was given to the illicit narcotic ring as isnow given to the Yiddish popular song manufacturers. In such a condition itwould be stupid to attack the addicts; common sense would urge the exposure ofthe pariderers.

A dreadful narcotizing of moralmodesty and the application of powerful aphrodisiacs have been involved in thepresent craze for crooning songs - a stimulated craze. The victims areeverywhere. But too few of the opponents of this moral poison see the futilityof scolding the young people thus diseased.

Common sense dictates a cleaning out,and a clearing out, of the sources of the disease. The source is in the Yiddishgroup of song manufacturers who control the whole output and who are responsiblefor the whole matter from poetry to profits.

Not so "popular"

Next to the moral indictment against the so-called"popular" song is the indictment that it is not popular. There is nospontaneous popularity, public taste is not so discriminating. It is artificialpopularity by constant plugging. It is a mere mechanical drumming on the mindsof the public. It is flung at them at every movie and from every stage. It isadvertised in flaring posters, gramophone records shriek forth day and night,dance bands plug it, radios plug it, and by sheer dint of repetition andsuggestion the song catches on - until it is replaced by another. It is the oldgame of changing the styles to speed up business and make the people buy.Nothing lasts in the Yiddish game - styles of clothing, movies nor songs; it isalways something "new" to stimulate the flow of money from the popularpocket into the moron music makers' coffers.

Two facts about the"popular" song are known to all: first, that for the most part it isindecent and the most active agent of moral miasma in the country, or if not themost active, then neck and neck with the "movies"; second, that the"popular" song industry is an exclusive Jewish industry.

There is work here for theAnti-Defamation League! That League knows how to put the screws on anyone whodisparages the Jews! From important publishers down to inconsequential countrynewspapers, the Anti-Defamation League makes itself felt. There is work for itin the movies and the theater and popular song industries. Why does not theLeague put the screws on those Jews who have degenerated the movies anddebauched the people in their "arts," sports, and entertainments? Onthose who have brought shame on the racial name? Why not? Is the answer thatonly non-Jews are to be controlled, and Jews let to run loose? Is the answerthat the gentle Gentiles can be curbed as by bridle and bit and the Jews cannot?American Jewry is desperately afraid of opening a single seam in its armour bymeans of a single investigation or reform. They are afraid of how far the fireof correction may spread!

__________________________________________________________

"To prevent them from reallythinking out any thing themselves, we shall deflect their attention toamusements, games, pastimes, excitements and people’s palaces. Such interestswill distract their minds completely from questions on which we might be obligedto struggle with them. Becoming less and less accustomed to independentthinking, people will express themselves in unison with us because we aloneoffer new lines of thought – of course through persons whom they do notconsider as in any way connected with us."

- The Thirteenth Protocol

12. Liquor, Gambling, Vice And Corruption

The Jew is the world’s enigma. Poorin his masses, yet he controls the world’s finances. Scattered abroad withoutcountry or official government, yet he presents a unity of race continuity whichno other people has achieved. For some centuries living under legal disabilitiesin almost every land, he emerged to become the power behind many a throne.

The single description which willinclude a larger percentage of Jews than members of any other race is this: heis in business. From the sale of old clothes to the control of internationaltrade and finance, the Jew is supremely gifted for business. More than any otherrace he exhibits a decided aversion to industrial employment which he balancesby an equally decided adaptability to trade.

The Gentile boy is prepared to workhis way up, taking employment in the productive or technical departments; butthe Jewish boy prefers to begin as a salesman, clerk, anything so long as it isconnected with the commercial side of the business.

In America alone most of the bigbusiness, the trusts, the banks, the natural resources and the chiefagricultural products, especially tobacco, cotton and sugar, are in the controlof Jewish financiers or their agents. Jewish journalists are a large andpowerful group here. Large numbers of department stores are held by Jewishfirms, and many of them, if not most, are run under Gentile names.

Jews are the largest and most numerouslandlords of residential property in the whole country. They are supreme in theentertainment world. They absolutely control the circulation of publicationsthroughout the country. More powerful than any race among us, they receive adaily amount of favorable publicity which would be impossible did they not havethe facilities for creating and distributing it themselves.

Werner Sombart, a pro-Jewish writer,in his "Jews and Modern Capitalism," says:

·        "If the conditions inAmerica continue to develop along the same lines as in the last generation, ifthe immigration statistics and the same proportion of births among all thenationalities remain the same, our imagination may picture the United States of50 or 100 years hence as a land inhabited only by Slavs, Negroes and Jews,wherein the Jew will naturally occupy the position of economic leadership."

The Jew is the only originalinternationalist capitalist, but as a rule he prefers not to emblazon that factupon the skies; the arresting fact about the Jew is his world wide unchallengedpower coupled with comparative numerical inferiority.

Jews And The Bootlegging Evil

The claim made for the Jews that theyare a sober race may be true, but that has not obscured two facts concerningthem; namely, that they usually constitute the liquor dealers of countries wherethey live in numbers, and that in the United States they were the only raceexempted from the operations of the Prohibition Law. In general, the Jews are onthe side of liquor and always have been. They are the steadiest drinkers of all.

That is why they were able to secureexemption from the Prohibition Laws; their religious ceremonies require them todrink an amount which the law considered equal to 10 gallons a year. So theProhibition Law of the United States – which was a part of the Constitution ofthe United States – was made legally ineffective to the extent of 10 gallons ayear to a Jew. Racial privilege? No, the Jews did not raise that scare then,during the profitable Prohibition era. They knew it was easy to get 100 gallonsthrough a 10 gallon loophole. In fact, millions of gallons of bootleg liquorcame through that 10 gallon loophole.

It came as a surprise to the Americanpeople that the liquor business of the world had been in the hands of the Jews.In the United States the liquor business was almost exclusively in the hands ofJews for 25 years prior to Prohibition; during the period, in fact, when theliquor trade was giving point and confirmation to the more extreme Prohibitionarguments!

In the volume, "The ConqueringJew," published by Funk & Wagnalls Company in 1916, John Foster Fraserwrites:

·        "The Jews are mastersof the whisky trade in the United States. Eighty per cent of the members of theNational Liquor Dealers’ Association are Jews. It has been shown that sixtyper cent of the business or distilling and wholesale trade in whisky is in thehands of Jews. As middle men they control the wine product of California. Jewsvisit the tobacco-growing States and buy up nearly all the leaf tobacco, so thatthe great tobacco companies have to buy the raw product from them. The Jews havea grip on the cigar trade."

It was also true of Europe, especiallyin Russia, Rumania and Poland. The Jewish Encyclopedia states that

·        "The establishment ofthe government liquor monopoly (in Russia in 1896) deprived thousands of Jewishfamilies of a livelihood."

They controlled the liquor traffic,the vodka business which undermined Russia. In Rumania the whole "JewishQuestion" was the liquor question. In Poland the same was true. In theUnited States whisky also became Jewish in the 19th century.

How The Jewish Liquor Trust Worked

An alcoholic spirit from grain may bemade in any climate and by many methods. Neutral spirits, high wines andalcohol, are not indigenous anywhere. They can be made in any back room orcellar, in a very little time. Little care is required. A concoction of drugsand spirits, colored and flavored, fraudulently labelled "whisky" andpassed over the bar, is a crime against distilling, against the human nervoussystem, and against society. As far back as 1904, Dr. Wiley, then chief of theUnited States Bureau of Chemistry, had a great deal to say about this. Few paidany attention to him because he did not point out that the evil he was attackingwas fostered by a single class of men bent on gain at the cost of ruin to anAmerican industry and to countless thousands of American citizens. The publicsupposed that Dr. Wiley was discussing a technical matter which interestedAmerican distillers only. It might have vastly interested the American if anyonehad but had the clear vision and the courage to expose the great Jewish whiskyconspiracy.

Old Names Bought Up

The Jewish character of the whiskybusiness since as far back as the Civil War may be visualized by the simpleexpedient of noting how many of the better known brands have at various datescome under Jewish control. It is an alarming list. Any citizen in any city ofany size will have no trouble in confirming the statement that most of therectifiers and wholesalers and brokers in the whisky trade of his city were, andstill are, Jews. It is not only the fact that the liquor business is controlledby Jews that assumes importance, but it is in the additional fact that there wasspread over America the machinery of a vicious system which while it wasdestined to ruin the liquor business, also ruined hundreds of thousands ofcitizens who trusted that "pure and unadulterated" meant what thewords were intended to convey. Of course the stuff was "pure andunadulterated." So is carbolic acid – but it is not whisky.

Prohibition came sweeping the saloonaway, but not depriving the Jewish compounder of his profits. Prohibition wasswept away but the booze rackets remained.

"NiggerGin"

In "Collier’s Weekly,"during the year 1908, solid truths appeared, which are in point today as proofsof what was transpiring. "Collier’s Weekly" was the firstjournal in the land to print the names of Jews in connection with the liquordebauchery of the country. Even so, it had been going on a very long time. Therewas a specially scathing attack on what was called "Nigger gin," apeculiarly vile beverage which was compounded to act upon the Negro in a mostvicious manner. The author, Will Irwin, spoke of this gin as

·        "The king iniquity inthe degenerated liquor traffic of these United States."

This author and Collier’sstarted a new fashion in giving publicity not only to the names of certainbrands of liquors, but also the names of the men who made them – all wereJews! The maker of one brand of "nigger gin" which had spurred certainNegroes on to the nameless crime, was one Lee Levy. Mr. Irwin detailed some ofhis experiences investigating the gin sold by a number of companies, all bearingJewish names. The gin was cheap, its labels bore lascivious suggestions and weredecorated with highly indecent portraiture of white women. "I never saw itin any saloon which bars the Negro," he wrote. Widely sold brands of cheap,noxious gins and other liquors, made by and brazenly sold under Jewish names,caused newspaper and police comments upon the peculiar lawlessness amongnegroes. With reference to the Negro Question, "nigger gin," theproduct of Jewish poisoned liquor factories, was its most provocative element.

The date of the appearance of this ginon the United States market is the period when Negro outbursts and subsequentlynchings became serious. The localities where this gin was sold are those wherethe disorders prevailed.

The Reasoned Answer

The ancient Jewish policy ofDivide-Conquer-Destroy tells the story of the liquor traffic. Jewish influencedivided between distilling and compounding, drove out distilling, and in the enddestroyed the traffic as a legalized entity – opening the way for themass-organized bootlegger, gangster, and the lawlessness which created today’sevil world.

It is extremely simple, so simple thatit is overlooked. "Divide and Conquer," is the formula as the Jewishleaders conceive it, as, indeed, it is stated in the Protocols. The public isbeing constantly deceived by an appearance of complexity, where there is none.When you find the fever-bearing mosquito, yellow-fever is no longer a mystery.That which succumbs to complete Judaization, as Jewish leaders conceive it, maydeserve to fall. The justification of its destruction may appear in thepossibility of its Judaization.

The maintenance of the idea ofdrink in the minds of the people is due to Jewish propaganda. There is not adialogue on the stage or screen that does not drip of drip of drink patter. Theidea of the abuse of drink will be maintained by means of the Jewish stage,Jewish jazz and Jewish comics, until somebody comes down hard upon it as beingincentive of treason.

** * *

Jewish Gamblers Corrupt American Sports

There are men in the United States whosay that baseball has received its death wound and is dying out of the lists ofrespectable sports. There are other men who say that American baseball can besaved if a clean sweep is made of the Jewish influence which has dragged itthrough a period of bitter shame and demoralization.

Whether baseball as a first-classsport is killed and will survive only as a cheap-jack entertainment; or whetherbaseball possesses sufficient intrinsic character to rise in righteous wrath andcast out the danger that menaces it, will remain a matter of various opinion.But there is one certainty, namely, that the last and most dangerous blow dealtbaseball was curiously notable for its Jewish character.

Baseball is a trivial matter comparedwith some of the facts that are waiting publication, yet it is possible to seethe operation of the Jewish Idea in baseball as clearly as in any other field.The process is the same, whether in war or politics, in finance or in sports.

To begin with, the Jews are notsportsmen. This is not set down in complaint against them, but merely asanalysis. It may be a defect in their character, or it may not; it isnevertheless a fact which discriminating Jews unhesitatingly acknowledge.Whether this is due to their physical lethargy, their dislike of unnecessaryphysical action, or their cast of mind, others may decide; the Jew is notnaturally an out-of-door sportsman; if he takes up golf it is because hisstation in society calls for it, not that he really likes it; and if he goes infor collegiate athletics, as some of the younger Jews are doing, it is becauseso much attention has been called to their neglect of sports that the youngergeneration thinks it necessary to remove that occasion of remark.

And yet, the bane of American sportsis the presence of a certain type of Jew, not as a participant but as anexploiter and corrupter. There is a very full case made out in justification ofthe use of the terms "exploiter" and "corrupter" with regardto baseball. But it would be just as easy to make out the same sort of case withregard to wrestling and horse racing and professional pugilism. Wrestling is socompletely ruled by Jews as to have become an outlawed sport. The story ofwrestling is not only the story of demoralization of a sport but also the storyof wholesale defrauding of the public. The same is true of horse-racing. Thewhole atmosphere of the sport is dishonest. The horses remain the only well-bredcreatures connected with it.

Yet why should the art of breeding andtraining and testing fine horses be debasing? Only because a certain class sawin it a chance to play on the weakness of men for the sake of gain.

That explains the presence of the Jewin modern sports and it also explains why the Jewish Idea in sports, instead ofbeing preservative, is corruptive. The Jew saw money where the sportsman saw funand skill. The Jew set out to capitalize rivalry and to commercialize contestantzeal. It would seem to be high time that organized Jewry should undertake tocontrol or repudiate those Jews who have been most instrumental in corruptingand nearly destroying our cleanest, most manly public sports.

It is worth noting that in Chicago,where the Jewish Anti-Defamation League has its headquarters, there was not aword of reproof sent out from Jews to the Jewish culprits, chiding them fortheir activities. Not a word. But at the same time the pressure of theAnti-Defamation League was heavy on the whole American newspaper press toprevent the public statements that the whole baseball scandal was a Jewishperformance from beginning to end. Heavy Jewish betting, the bribing ofplayers, the buying of clubs, the cheating of the public, has been proved timeand again in American courts. All along the line of investigation into sportingscandals the names of Jews are plentifully sprinkled.

If "fans" wish to know thetrouble with American baseball, they have it in three words – too much Jew."Gentile fronts" may rant out their parrot-like pro-Jewish propaganda,the fact is that a sport is clean and helpful until it begins to attract Jewishinvestors and exploiters and then it goes bad. The two facts have occurred inpairs too frequently in America and under too many dissimilar circumstances tohave their relationship doubted. There are no variations on the Jewishcorruption of American sports, principally baseball, racing, boxing andwrestling. In the fixing of results, the swindling of gamblers, the staging offrauds, the rottenness has been discovered between the Jewish investors and thevenal contestants.

It should be emphasized that theprincipal Jewish abuses are nation-wide. This was shown in the UnitedStates Government’s investigation of the White Slave Traffic; the bootleggingbusiness, racetrack gambling, baseball pools – all a national network for thecatching of "suckers." There is nothing unusual in this Jewishactivity – from the clever "high-ups" to the degenerate"low-downs"; they are all part of a national group. They are part ofthe national machinery organized and operated for the purpose of separating"Gentile boobs" from their money.

If there were no "Gentileboobs," or if the "Gentile boob" would only take a straight lookat the man behind the nation-wide spiderweb, the gamblers and the Jewishsport-purveyors would be in another kind of business; with perhaps less money toflaunt in the faces of honest people.

Years before the public scandalsbroke, the Jew had crowded into all the lucrative sports; he remains in controlof them, but only on the commercial side, seldom if ever in sympathy with sportas a real sportsman. The Jews are not even real gamblers, they are not sportsmenenough to gamble; they are the "surething" men. The "Gentileboobs" who walk into their traps are the people who provide the money. Evenin the field of money the Jew is not a sport – he is a gangster, ringing agang of his ilk round him.

Wrestling

Wrestling is so tightly controlled byJewish managers that a real wrestler is absolutely barred out, for fear he willbe able to show that the handful of wrestlers hired by the Jewish Sports Trustare not wrestlers at all, but only impositions on the good nature of the public.The rottenness of the ancient sport of clean wrestling has surfaced in suchdisgusting orgies as "all in" and "mud" wrestling and,lately, wrestling contests between screaming viragos of the female sex.Wrestling is as much a Jewish business controlled in its every part asthe manufacture of clothing.

Despite unending graft scandalsbaseball is still America’s Number One sport. It cannot be killed as a business;it will always draw a gang on an afternoon, particularly a Sunday afternoon. Itcan be pepped up and "Jazzed" up to make it quite a show. But it can,it is being, killed as a sport, and those who value the game as a sport shouldwish its utter destruction rather than consent that it become the rendezvous forthe gang that now fill the Jew-controlled burlesque houses. Baseball as a businesshas become a danger in American life, a mob center, a hang-out for thedisorderly and criminal classes, as the race-track and boxing ring have longsince been.

The disease is caused by the Jewishcharacteristic which spoils everything by ruthless commercial exploitation. Thedisease may be too far gone for any cure.

_____________________________________________________________________

"People of all opinions and alldoctrines are at our service, restorers of monarchy, demagogues, Socialists,Communists and other Utopians. We have put them all to work. Every one of themfrom this point of view is undermining the last remnant of authority, is tryingto overthrow all existing order. All the governments have been tormented bythese actions. But we will not give them peace until they recognize oursuper-government."

- The Ninth Protocol

"When we introduced the poison ofliberalism into the government organism, its entire political complexionchanged."

- The Tenth Protocol

13. The World’s Foremost Problem

Anyone who essays to discuss theJewish Question in the United States or anywhere else must be fully prepared tobe regarded as "anti-Semite," a "Jewbaiter." Nor needencouragement be looked for from politicians, people or Press. The people whoare awake to the subject at all prefer to wait and see how it all turns out.There is a vague feeling that to use the word "Jew" openly, or toexpose it nakedly in print, is somehow improper. Polite evasions like"Hebrew" and "Semite" (both of which are subject to thecriticism of inaccuracy) are timidly assayed, and people pick their way gingerlyas if the whole subject were forbidden, until some courageous thinker comesalong with the word "Jew," and then the constraint is relieved and theair cleared.

The word "Jew" is not anepithet; it is a name, ancient and descriptive, with a significance for everyperiod of human history, past, present and to come.

The chief difficulty in writing aboutthe Jewish Question is the supersensitiveness of Jews and non-Jews concerningthe whole matter. There is probably not a newspaper in America, and certainlynone of the advertising mediums which are called magazines, which would have thetemerity even to breathe seriously the fact that such a Question exists. ThePress in general is open to fulsome editorials in favor of everything Jewish,while the Jewish Press, which is numerous in the United States, takes care ofthe vituperative end.

The idea seems to be fixed in the Jewby inheritance that any public discussion of the Jewish Question is organizedand inspired by a Jew-hater. That idea is sought to be fixed in the Gentile bypropaganda; that any writing which does not simply cloy and drip sirrupysweetness towards things Jewish is born of prejudice and hatred. It is,therefore, "full of lies, insult, insinuation, and constitutes aninstigation to massacre." These terms can be found in current Jewisheditorials.

What Is "Anti-Semitism"?

Anti-Semitism is a term which isbandied about too loosely. If it continues to be used indiscriminately andvituperatively about all who attempt to discuss Jewish characteristics andJewish world-power, it will, in time, arrive at the estate of respectability andhonor. It may be a useful clearing of the ground to define what anti-Semitism isnot.

1. It is not a recognition of theJewish Question If it were, then it could be set down that the bulk of theAmerican people are destined to become anti-Semites, for they are beginning torecognize the existence of a Jewish Question and will steadily do so inincreasing numbers as the Question is forded on them from the various practicalangles of their lives. The Question is here. We may be honestly blind to it. Wemay be timidly silent about it. We may even make dishonest denial of it. But itis here and in time all will have to recognize it. In time the polite"hush, hush," of oversensitive or intimidated circles will not bepowerful enough to suppress it.

But to recognize that Questionwill not mean that we have gone over to a national campaign of hatred and enmityagainst the Jews. It will only mean that a stream of tendency which has beenflowing through our civilization has at last accumulated bulk and power enoughto Challenge attention, to call for some decision with regard to it, to call forthe adoption of a policy which will not repeat the mistakes of the past and yetforestall any possible menace of the future.

2. The public discussion of the JewishQuestion is not "anti-Semitism." Publicity is sanitary. But the kindof publicity given to certain aspects of the Jewish Question in this country hasbeen very misleading. It has been discussed more fully in the Jewish Press thanelsewhere, but not with candor or breadth of vision. The two dominant notes –sounded over and over again with monotonous regularity – are Gentileunfairness and Christian prejudice. It is fortunate for the Jews generally thatthe Jewish Press does not Circulate very widely among Gentiles, for it isprobably the one established agency in the United States which, without alteringits program in the least, could stir up anti-Jewish sentiment by the very simpleexpedient of a general reading among non-Jews. Jewish writers writing forJewish-readers present unusual material for the study of race consciousness andits accompaniment of contempt for other races.

On the side of the daily Press, therehas been no serious discussion at all. When it mentions the Jews, it has stockedcomplimentary phrases for the purpose. The publicity given to the Question inthis country consists in misrepresentative criticism of the Gentiles by theJewish Press, and misrepresentative praise of the Jews by the non-Jewish Press.An independent effort to give constructive publicity cannot, therefore, be laidto anti-Semitism, even when some of the statements which are made in the courseof it arouse resentment of Jewish readers.

3. Nor is it anti-Semitism to say thatthe suspicion is abroad in every capital of civilization, and the certainty isfirmly held by a number of important men, that there is active in the world aplan to control the world, not by territorial acquisition, not by militaryaggression, not by governmental subjection, not even by economic control in thescientific sense, but by control of the machinery of commerce and exchange. Itis not anti-Semitism to say that, nor to present the evidence which supportsthat, nor to bring the proof of that. Those who could best disprove it, if itwere not true, are the International Jews themselves, belt they have notdisproved it.

Why Discuss The Jewish Question?

Because it is here, and because itsemergence into public thought should contribute to its solution, and not to acontinuance of those bad conditions which surround the Question in almost everycountry. The Jewish Question has existed in the United States for a very longtime. Jews themselves have known it, even if Gentiles have not. There have beenperiods in our own country when it has broken forth with a sullen sort ofstrength which presaged dark things to come. Many signs portend that it isapproaching an acute stage.

Not only does the Jewish Questiontouch those matters that are common knowledge, such as finance and commercialcontrol, usurpation of political power, monopoly of necessities, and autocraticdirection of the very news that the American people read; but it reaches intocultural regions and so touches the very heart of American life. The Questionreaches down to South America and threatens to become an important factor inPan-American relations. It is interwoven with much of the menace of organizedand calculated disorder which troubles the nations today. It is not of recentgrowth, but its roots go deep, and the long Past of the Problem iscounterbalanced by prophetic hopes and programs which involve a very deliberateand creative view of the future.

The Answer: Too Much Power!!

Their heritage of tolerance hassomething to do with the extreme nervousness about public discussion of theJewish Question on the part of many Gentiles, but perhaps their instinctivesense of the difficulty involved has more to do with it. The Gentile attitude isbest expressed by the desire for silence – "Why discuss it at all?"Such an attitude is itself proof that here is a Problem we would evade if wecould. Why discuss it at all? – the keen thinker clearly sees in theimplications of such a question, the existence of a Problem whose discussion orsuppression will not always be within the choice of easy-going minds.

Wherever you read of the JewishQuestion being resolutely approached in the history of countries which have evertackled it, wherever yowl go in the world today – in any country where theJewish Question has come to the forefront as a vital issue, you will discoverthat the principal cause is the outworking of the Jewish genius toachieve the power of control. Here in the United States is the fact ofthis remarkable minority attaining in 50 years a degree of control that would beimpossible to a ten times larger group of any other race. That creates theJewish Question here.

No similar minority of any peoplewould occasion comment, because we would not meet with a representative of themwherever we went in high places – in the innermost secrecy of the councils ofthe Big Four at Versailles [Editors Note: The original was published in June,1920. The comment is even more applicable to the present United Nations set-up;a more formidable organization because of its greater power through Americanmembership.]; in the United States Supreme Court; in the councils of the WhiteHouse; in the vast dispositions of world finance – wherever there is power toget or use. We meet the Jew everywhere in the upper circles, literallyeverywhere where there is power. And that is where the Jewish questionbegins – in very simple terms – How does the Jew so habitually and soresistlessly gravitate to the highest places? Who puts him there? Why ishe put there? What does he do there? What does the fact of his being theremean to the world? THAT is the Jewish Question in its origin. From thesepoints it goes on to others, and whether the trend becomes pro-Jewish oranti-Semitic depends on the amount of prejudice brought to the inquiry, andwhether it becomes pro-Humanity depends on the amount of insight andintelligence.

The use of the word Humanity inconnection with the word "Jew" usually throws a side meaning which maynot be intended. In this connection it is usually understood that humanity oughtto be shown toward the Jew. There is just as great an obligation upon the Jew toshow his humanity toward the whole human race.

The Jew has been too long accustomedto think himself as exclusively the claimant on the humanitarianism of society;society has a large claim against him that he cease his exclusiveness, that hecease exploiting the world, that he cease making Jewish groups the end and allof his gains, and that he begins to fulfill, in a sense his exclusiveness hasnever yet enabled him to fulfill, the ancient prophecy he boasts that throughhim all the nations of the earth should be blessed.

The Jew cannot go on foreverfulfilling the role of suppliant for the world’s humanitarianism, he musthimself show that quality to a society which seriously suspects his higher andmore powerful groups of exploiting it with a pitiless rapacity, which in itswide-flung and long-drawnout distress may be described as an economic programagainst a rather helpless humanity.

Why The "International Jew"?

There has been used in this series theterm "International Jew." It is susceptible of two interpretations;one, the Jew wherever he may be; the other, the Jew who exercises internationalcontrol.

The real contention of the world iswith the latter and his satellites, whether Jew or Gentile. This Internationaltype of Jew, this grasper after world-control, this actual possessor and wielderof world-control is a very unfortunate connection for his race to have. And thesignificance of this is that this type does not grow anywhere else than on aJewish stem. There is no other racial or national type which puts forth thiskind of person.

It is not merely that there are a fewJews among international financial controllers; it is that theseworld-controllers are exclusively Jews. Since world-control is anambition which has only been achieved by Jews, and not by any of the methodsusually adopted by would-be world-conquerors, it becomes inevitable that thequestion should center in that race.

It is not the point to insist that inany list of rich men there are often more Gentiles than Jews; we are not talkingabout merely rich men who have, many of them, gained their riches by serving aSystem, we are talking about those who control – and it is perfectlyapparent that merely to be rich is not to control. The world-controlling Jew hasriches, but he also has something much more powerful than that.

The International Jew rules notbecause is rich, but because in a most marked degree he possesses the commercialand masterful genius of his race, and avails himself of a racial loyalty andsolidarity the like of which exists in no other human group. He rules, at thetop of affairs in every country worth while, by virtue of certain qualitieswhich are inherent in the Jewish nature. Every Jew has these qualities even ifnot in the supreme sense, just as every Englishman has Shakespeare’s tonguebut not in Shakespeare’s degree. And thus it is impracticable, if notimpossible, to consider the International Jew without laying the foundationsbroadly upon Jewish character and psychology.

We may discount at once the too commonaccusation that this greater form of Jewish success is built upon dishonesty. Itis impossible to indict the whole Jewish people or any other on a wholesalecharge. No one knows better than the Jew how widespread is the belief thatJewish methods of business are all unscrupulous. There is no doubt a possibilityof a great deal of unscrupulousness existing without actual legal dishonesty,but it is altogether possible that the reputation the Jewish people have longborne in this respect may have had other sources than actual and persistentdishonesty. To indicate one of these possible sources: The Jew at trade isnaturally quicker than most other men. It is said that there are other raceswhich are as nimble at a trade as is the Jew, but the Jew does not live muchamong them. Now, it is human nature for the man with slower, easy-goingtraditions to believe that the quicker man is too deft by far, and to becomesuspicious of his deftness. The slower mind is likely to conceive that the manwho sees so many legitimate twists and turns to a trade, may also see and use aconvenient number of illegitimate twists and turns. The Jews, as the recordsshow for centuries, were a keen people in trade. The nimble eagerness of the Jewfor trade bustled into the midst of trade traditions, he broke them all whereverhe went. He went after trade, the old leisurely tradition was to maketrade come to the trader. Everyone suspects the "sharp" fellow eventhough his sharpness may be entirely honest. A man who would break tradetraditions would stop at nothing! The Jew was anxious to sell. If he could notsell one article to a customer, he had another on hand to offer him. The oldtradition was that it was strictly unethical and unbusinesslike to handle morethan one line of goods, or to deal in more than one "trade"; that itwas contemptible and underhand to go out and get a brother tradesman’scustomers away from him. It is as easy as child’s play to connect this energywith dishonesty. The Jew went after trade, pursued it, persuaded it. He was theoriginator of "quick turnover and quick profit." He originated theinstalment plan. The Jew’s shops became bazaars, forerunners of our moderndepartment stores, and the old custom of one shop for one line of goods wasbroken up . . . . the Jew was not playing the game, the staid old-fashionedmerchant thought. As a matter of fact he was playing the game, the game to getit all into his own hands – which he has practically done.

The Jew has shown that same abilityever since his entry into trade in the various countries he has establishedhimself down the centuries. His power of analyzing the money currents amounts toan instinct. His establishment in one country represented another base fromwhich the members of his race could operate. Whether by the natural outworkingsof innate gifts or the deliberate plan of race unity and loyalty, all the Jewishtrading communities and relations, and as these trading communities increased inwealth, prestige and power, as they formed relations with governments and greatinterests in the countries where they operated, they simply put more power intothe central community wherever it might be located, now in Spain, now inHolland, now in England.

Whether by intention or not, theybecame more closely allied than the branches of one business could be, becauseof the cement of racial unity; the bond of racial brotherhood cannot in the verynature of things exist among the Gentiles as it exists among the Jews.

Gentiles never think of themselves asGentiles, and never feel that they owe anything to another Gentile as such;wherein lies their vulnerability. Thus they have been convenient agents ofJewish schemes at times and in places when it was not expedient that the Jewishcontrollers should be publicly known; but they have never been successfulcompetitors of the Jew in the field of world-control.

From these separated Jewishcommunities went power to the central community where the master bankers and themaster analysts of conditions lived. And back from the central community flowedinformation of an invaluable character and assistance wherever needed. It is notdifficult to understand how, in such conditions, the nation that did not dealkindly with the Jews was made to suffer, and the nation that yielded to themtheir fullest desire was favored by them. They have made many nations feel thepower of their displeasure and this system exists in greater power today. The co-ordinationof Jewish activity has been a harmfu1 thing for the world. This is theelement which is bringing the Jewish Question to the bar of public opinion. Maythe International Jew go on as he has gone, or does his duty to the worldrequire another use of his success?

Power Follows The International Jew

It is an important fact to be noted inconnection with the "persecution" and consequent wanderings of theJews about Europe that wherever they wandered the center of business seemed togo with them!

When the Jews were free in Spain,there was the world’s gold center. When Spain drove out the Jews, Spain losther financial leadership and has never regained it.

Students of the economic history ofEurope have always been puzzled to discover why the center of trade should haveshifted from Spain, Portugal and Italy, up to the northern countries of Holland,Germany and England. They have sought for the cause in many things, but noneseemed to be completely explanatory. When it is shown that the change wascoincident with the expulsion of the Jews from the South and their flight to theNorth, when it is known that upon the Jews’ arrival the northern countriesbegan a commercial life which has flourished to our day, the explanation doesnot seem difficult. Time and again it has been proved to be the fact that whenthe Jews were forced to move, the center of the world’s precious metals movedwith them.

It is also to be noted that the era ofgreatest national spiritual culture is shown during the period when the Jewswere expelled from England and Spain. These two great countries have given muchto the world, the best of it they gave during their freedom from contact withJewish ideas.

"When America Awakens!"

It is clearly proved that in the worldtoday there is a central force which is playing a vast and closely organizedgame, with the world as its table and universal control for its stakes.Civilized people have long ago lost confidence in the argument that"economic conditions" are responsible for all the changes that occur.Under the camouflage of "economic law" a great many phenomena havebeen amounted for which were not due to any "law" whatever, except thelaw of the selfish human will as operated by the men who have the purpose andthe power to use the nation as their vassals.

"Economic" reason no longerexplains the condition in which the world finds itself today. Neither does theordinary explanation of "the heartlessness of Capital."

"Capital" has endeavored asnever before to meet the demands of "Labor," and labor has gone toextremes in leading capital to new concessions – but what has it advantagedeither of them? "Labor" has heretofore thought that"Capital" was the sky over it, and it made the sky yield. But behold,there was yet another higher sky which neither capital nor labor had seen intheir struggles with one another. That sky is so far unyielding.

There is a super-capitalism which issupported wholly by the fiction that gold is wealth. There is asuper-government which is allied to no government, which is free from them all,and yet which has its hands in them all. There is a race, a part of humanity,which has never yet been received as a welcome part, and which has succeeded inraising itself to a power that the proudest Gentile race has never claimed.

The "labor question," thewage question, the land question, cannot be settled, no question that confrontsthe peoples of the world can be settled, until first of all this matter of aninternational super-capitalistic government is settled.

"To the victor belongs thespoils" is an old saying. In a sense it is true that if all this power ofcontrol has been gained and held by a few men of a long-despised race, theneither they are super-men whom it is powerless to resist, or they are ordinarymen whom the rest of the world has permitted to obtain an undue and unsafedegree of power. Unless the Jews are super-men, the Gentiles will havethemselves to blame for what has transpired, and they can look for rectificationin a new scrutiny of the situation and a candid examination of the experiencesof other countries. When tracing all the anti-social and colossally harmfulmethods of world-control to their source, it is found that the responsibleparties all have a common characteristic. Is it any wonder that the warningwhich comes across the sea – "Wait until America becomes awake to theJew!" has a new meaning?

___________________________________________________________

"In this divergence between theGentiles and ourselves in ability to think and reason is to be seen clearly theseal of our election as the chosen people, as higher human beings, in contrastwith the Gentiles who have merely instinctive and animal minds. They observe,but they do not foresee, and they invent nothing (except perhaps materialthings). It is clear from this that nature herself predestined us to rule andguide the world."

- The Fourteenth Protocol

14. The High And Low Of Jewish Money-Power

Humanity has become wise enough todiscuss those forms of physical sickness over which it formerly drew the veil ofshame and secrecy, but political hygiene is not so far advanced. The main sourceof the sickness of our national body is charged to be the influence of the Jews,and although this was apparent to acute minds years ago, it is now said to havegone so far as to be apparent to the least observing. But while these influenceswere undermining the mass of the people, higher influences of Jewish origin wereoperating on the government.

The Jewish Problem in the UnitedStates is essentially a city problem; great cities are the areas in which mostall national disease have their origin. It is characteristic of the Jews togather in numbers, not where land is open nor where raw materials are found, butwhere the greatest number of people abide. This is a noteworthy fact whenconsidered alongside the claim that the Gentiles have ostracized them; the Jewscongregate in their greatest numbers in those places and among those peoplewhere they complain they are least wanted!

The explanation most frequently givenis this: the genius of the Jew is to live off people, not off land, nor off theproduction of commodities from raw materials, but off people. Let other peopletill the soil; the Jew, if he can, will live off the tiller. Let other peopletoil at trades and manufacture; the Jew will exploit the fruits of their work.That is his particular genius. If this genius be described as parasitic,the term would seem to be justified by a certain fitness.

In no other city of the United Statescan the Jewish Problem be studied with greater profit than in the city of NewYork. There are more Jews in New York than anywhere else in the world; at leastone Jew in every ten resides in New York. Jews exert more power in New York, andfrom New York, than they have ever exerted during the Christian era in any placewith the exception of present Russia. The Jewish Revolution of Russia was mannedfrom New York. The Jewish government of Russia was transported almost as a unitfrom the lower East Side of New York. The general run of shopkeeping, from thegreat departmental stores to the smallest "junk" shop, is practicallymonopolized by Jews. The legal profession is predominantly Jewish. From newsagencies that distribute news to the newspapers, to the newspaper that printsit, to the news-stand that distributes the national reading matter, the controland in most cases the ownership is entirely Jewish. In Wall Street the Jewishelement is both numerous and powerful, as might be expected of a race which fromearly days has played an important part in the financial operations of theworld.

The Rothschild Method

Jewish high finance first touched theUnited States through the Rothschilds. Indeed, it may be said that the UnitedStates founded the Rothschild fortunes. As so often occurs in the tale of Jewishriches, the fortune was founded in war. The first 20 million dollars theRothschilds ever had to speculate with was money paid for Hessian troops tofight against the American colonies.

Since that first indirect connectionwith American affairs, the Rothschilds have often invaded the money affairs ofthe country, though always by agents. None of the Rothschilds sons thought itnecessary to establish himself in the newly-founded United Stated. Anselmremained in Frankfort, Solomon chose Vienna, Nathan Mayer went to London,Charles established himself in Naples, and James represented the family inParis.

These were the five war-lords ofEurope for more than a generation, and their dynasty was continued by theirsuccessors.

Rothschild power, as it was onceknown, has been so broadened by the entry of other banking families intogovernmental finance, that it must now be known not by the name of one family ofJews, but by the name of the race. Thus it is spoken of as International JewishFinance, and its principal figures are described as International JewishFinanciers. Much of the veil of secrecy which contributed so greatly to theRothschild power has been stripped away; war finance has been labelled for alltime as "blood money," and the mysterious magic surrounding largetransactions between governments and individuals, by which individualcontrollers of large wealth were made the real rulers of the people, has beenlargely solved and the plain facts disclosed.

The Rothschild method still holdsgood, however, in that Jewish institutions are affiliated with their racialinstitutions in all foreign countries. As a leading student of financial affairsputs it, the world of high finance is largely a Jewish world because of theJewish financier’s "absence from national or patriotic illusions."To the International Jewish Financier the ups and downs of war and peace betweenthe nations are but the changes of the world’s financial market; and, asfrequently the movement of stocks is manipulated for purposes of marketstrategy, so sometimes international relations are affected for mere financialgain.

It is known that the first world warwas postponed several times at the behest of international financiers. If itbroke out too soon, it would not involve the states which the internationalfinanciers wished to involve. Therefore, the masters of gold, the internationalmasters, were compelled several times to check the martial enthusiasm whichtheir own propaganda had aroused. The Jewish Press alleges that there wasdiscovered a Rothschild Letter dated 191l, and urging the Kaiser against war.The year 1911 was too early. There was no such insistence in 1914.

There is no question whatever ofInternational Jewish Finance being deeply concerned in the matter of war andrevolution – this is never denied as to the past; it is just as true of thepresent. The league against Napoleon, for example, was Jewish. Its headquarterswere in Holland. When Napoleon invaded Holland, the headquarters were moved toFrankfort-on-the-Main. It is remarkable how many of the International JewishFinanciers have come out of Frankfurt – the Rothschilds, the Schiffs, theSpeyers, to name but a few. Jewish influence in German affairs came strongly tothe front during the 1914-1918 war. It came with all the directness and attackof a flying wedge, as if previously prepared. There are no stronger contrasts inthe world than the pure Germanic and pure Semitic races; therefore, there hasbeen no harmony between the two in Germany, and though Jewish influence becamestrong in that country it was not gained without challenge, but Jewish powerbecame paramount in the Revolution which followed the war. The Revolution wouldnot have come if they had not brought it. The principal Jewish influences whichbrought down German order may be named under three heads: (a) the spirit ofBolshevism which masqueraded under the name of German Socialism; (b) Jewishownership and control of the Press; (c) Jewish control of the food supply andthe industrial machinery of the country. There was a fourth, "higherup," but these worked upon the German people directly. It will be recalledthat the German collapse in that war was directly due to food starvation andmaterial shortages, and to industrial unrest. As early as the second year of thewar, German Jews were preaching that German defeat was necessary to the rise ofthe proletariat. Strovel declared: "I openly admit that a full victory ofthe country would not be in the interest of the Social Democrats." Andalso: "The exaltation of the proletariat after a won victory is animpossibility." Revolution is the expression of the Jews’ will to power.Parties are but tools for the Jewish plan to power. The so-called"dictatorship of the proletariat" is really and practically thedictatorship of the Jews.

The 1914-1918 war brought about acondition which threw a new light on the internationalism of Jewish finance.During the years of American neutrality there was opportunity to observe theextent of the foreign affiliations of certain men, and also the extent to whichordinary national loyalty was subordinated to the business of internationalfinance. That war really forced a coalition of Gentile capital on one side ofthe struggle, as against certain blocks of Jewish capital which were willing toplay both sides. The old Rothschild maxim: "Do not put all your eggs in onebasket," becomes perfectly plain when transposed into national andinternational terms. Jewish finance treats political parties the same – betson them both, and so never loses. In the same way Jewish finance never loses awar. Being on both sides, it cannot miss the winning side, and its terms ofpeace are sufficient to cover all advances to the side that lost. This was thesignificance of the great swarming of Jews at the Versailles Peace Conference.

But a strange fatality seems to followall forms of Jewish supremacy. Just as the capstone is ready to be placed on theedifice of Jewish triumphs, something occurs and the structure shrinks. Itoccurs so often in Jewish history that the Jews themselves have been exercisedto find an explanation. In many cases "anti-Semitism," offers thereadiest excuse, but not always. Just at the present time, when the light whichwas shed by the fires of war has revealed so many matters formerly hidden inshadow, the awakening of world attention is called "anti-Semitism,"and the explanation is given that "after every war the Jew becomes thescapegoat" – a curious admission which would lead a less self-centeredpeople to inquire, Why?

Scope Of Jewish Money Power

In the firm of Kuhn, Loeb and Company,Jewish finance in the United States reached its high-water mark. The head ofthis firm was the late Jacob Schiff, who was born in Frankfort-on-the-Main andwhose father was one of the Rothschild brokers. One of Jacob Schiff,sassociates, Otto Kahn, was born in Mannheim, and was early associated with theSpeyers, who also originated in Frankfort and who came to great power in Englandduring the reign of Edward VII. Another associate, Felix Warburg, married intoJacob Schiff’s family, and the Warburgs, became some of the most influentialmembers of America’s diplomatic representatives.

Early flank movements of Jewishfinanciers in America sought out other objectives in foreign countries whosefuture influence on American affairs proved to be considerable. The first flankmovement was toward Central and South America. The financial assistance,practical and advisory, offered to Mexico during the most unsatisfactory periodof her relations with the United States was given by Jewish groups. Thepolitical upheavals and the financial arrangements in the tiny but strategicallyplaced countries of Central America are too notorious even to occasion comment.

It is known that Jacob Schiff gavematerial assistance to Japan in the 1905 war with Russia. This was explainableon the ground of good business and also of a desire to revenge Russia’streatment of the Jews. Schiff used the opportunity also to instill theprinciples, which have since grown up into Bolshevism, into the minds of theRussian prisoners in Japanese war camps. The attempt to gain influence in Japan,in those distant days, came off rather badly. The Japs kept the business dealstrictly a business deal, and Mr. Jacob Schiff was displeased with Japangenerally. The idea at the beginning of the century appears to have been to addthe newly rising Japan to the string of financial conquests, but the Japanesewere credited with knowing much more about the "Jewish peril" than didthe United States. This is well worth recalling in view of the intensivepropaganda which, for years before the 1914 war, constantly sought to createmisunderstanding between the United States and the Empire of Japan.

Jewry emerged from the 1914-1918 warmore strongly entrenched in power, even in the United States, than it wasbefore. In the world at large the ascendancy of the Jew at the present time iseven more marked. In those countries which can justly be called unfriendly tothe Jew, now or in the recent past, the rule of the Jew is stronger thananywhere else. The more they are opposed, the more they show their power. At amoment when, as all Jewish spokesmen inform us, there is a world-wave of"anti-Semitism," – which is their name for a new awakening of peopleto what has been going on – what should occur but that at the head of theChief Magistracy of the World [Editor’s Note: The League of Nations isreferred to in the original (1920) text and the same factor arises in thepresent direction of the "United Nations." The more it changes, themore it is the same thing] a Jew appears. Nobody seems to know why. Nobody canexplain it.

"Disraeli Of America"

A Jew Of Super-Power

In the United States we had a term ofJewish rule [Editor’s Note: In each instance the 1914-1918 war is referred toduring the administration of President Wilson. It is a vital fact that thesame man (Baruch) was the right-hand man of President Roosevelt throughoutthe Roosevelt peace and war administrations!] almost as absolute as that whichexists in Russia. This appears to be a very strong statement, but it is milderthan the facts warrant. And the facts are not of hearsay origin, nor the productof a biased point of view; they are the fruits of an inquiry by the lawfulofficials of the United States who were set aside in favor of a readymade JewishGovernment, and they are forever spread upon the official records of the UnitedStates.

The Jews have proved that the controlof Wall Street is not necessary to the control of the American people, and theperson by whom they proved this was a Wall Street Jew!

This man has been called "thepro-consu1 of Judah in America." It is said that once, referring tohimself, he exclaimed: "Behold the Disraeli of the United States!"

To a select committee of the Congressof the United States he said: "I probably had more power than perhapsany other man did in the war; doubtless that is true." [Editor’sNote: In the second world war, in which the man was all powerful, his closefriend, Winston Churchill, was British Prime Minister. It is significant thatthe "concentration of industry" system in Britain threw all commercialsecrets into the hands of monopolist cartels, and the secrets of Britishmilitary and industrial developments were made freely available to Jewishmanipulators.]

He did not overstate the case. He didhave more power. It was not all legal power, this much he admitted. It reachedinto every home and store and factory and bank and railway and mine. It touchedarmies and governments. It touched recruiting boards. It made and unmade menwithout a word. It was power without responsibility and without limit. It wassuch a power as compelled the Gentile population to lay bare every secret beforethis man and his Jewish associates, giving them an advantage and knowledge thatbillions of gold could not buy.

Not one American in a million everheard of this man before the entry of the United States into the war in 1917. Heglided out of a certain obscurity unlighted by public service of fame, into thehigh rulership of the nation at war. The constituted government had little to dowith him save vote the money and do his bidding. He said that men could haveappealed over his head to the President of the United States but, knowing thesituation, men never did.

Who was, who is, this figure, colossalin his way, and most instructive of the readiness of Judah to take the rulewhenever he desires?

His name is Bernard M. Baruch.He was born in South Carolina in the 1870’s, the son of a Jewish doctor, Dr.Simon Baruch. He was graduated at the College of the City of New York when hewas just under 19 years of age. After going down to Wall Street as a clerk and arunner, and when he "was about 26 or 27," he became a member of thefirm of A. A. Housman and Company. "In about 1900 or 1902" he left thefirm, but he had meanwhile gained a seat on the Stock Exchange.

He then went into business himself, astatement which must be taken literally in view of his testimony that he

·        "Did not do anybusiness for anybody but myself. I made a study of the corporations engaged inthe production and manufacture of different things, and a study of the menengaged in them."

Emerging from his evidence beforeCongress, Baruch’s operations are seen to be in various fields; principally inthe field of metals and the organization of various commercial enterprises. Hewas instrumental also in the purchase of tobacco companies, various copper,steel, tungsten, rubber and smelting companies, and he was responsible for thebuilding up of the great industries in rubber in Mexico. As a young man, he isfound to be the master of large sums of money, and there is no indication thathe inherited any. He is very wealthy. What change the war made in his wealth isnot known, but certainly many of his friends and close associates reaped greatquantities of money from their activities during the war.

Dictator Baruch

Cross-examined by the Congress Inquiryit was amply proved that Baruch’s influence over President Wilson made suchchanges in the Administration as to make Baruch the most powerful man in thewar. The Council of National Defense eventually became the merest side show. Itwas not a Council of Americans that ran the war, it was an autocracy headed by aJew, with Jews at every strategic point down the line. In his own evidence hedescribes one of his visits to the President in 1915.

Mr. Baruch: "I thought a war wascoming long before it did . . . . I explained to him as earnestly as I couldthat I was very deeply concerned about the necessity of the mobilization of theindustries of the country. The President listened very attentively andgraciously, as he always does . . . . My attention was brought to the Council ofNational Defense . . . . The Secretary of War asked me what I thought of it. Isaid I would like to have something different." A council is a council.Mr. Baruch wanted something different. He did get something different. Hegot the President to change matters so as to make Mr. Baruch the "mostpowerful man in the war." What Baruch did was very masterly, but it was notin the American manner. No one but a member of his race would have wanted to doit.

There is no discounting the testimonyBaruch gave before Congress. The President of the United States did exactly whatBaruch wanted in a thousand ways, and what Baruch apparently wanted was a rulinghand on productive America, and he got it. He got it in a larger way than evenLenin or his successors ever got in Russia; for here in the United States thepeople saw nothing but the patriotic element; they did not see the JewishGovernment looming above them. Yet it was there.

So Baruch did things. Before he gotthrough, he was head and center of a system of control such as the United StatesGovernment never possessed and never will possess until it changes its characteras a free government. As told by himself, his power consisted in the followingauthorities:

1. Authority over the use ofcapital in the private business of Americans. (This authority was nominallyunder the Capital Issues Committee, the controlling factor of which was anotherJew, Eugene Meyer, Jr.)

2. Authority over all materials.This, of course, included everything. Mr. Baruch was an expert in many of thelines of materials involved, and had held interests in many of them. In lineswhere Mr. Baruch was not an expert, he of course, had other experts in charge;Jews. "The members of that committee were picked out by myself; theindustries did not pick them out," he stated [Editor’s Note: Theextension of the "control of industry and materials" system in WorldWar II, and the development of the methods and powers of Baruch and hispolitical associates in the "Western Democracies" in the latter war,make an interesting parallel to the disclosures in Congress after the firstworld war. The Plan in progress, in fact.].

3. Authority over industries.He determined where coal might be shipped, where steel might be sold, whereindustries might be operated and where not. He said, it is in his recordedtestimony, that there were 351 or 357 lines of industry under his control in theUnited States including "practically every raw material in the world. I hadthe final authority."

4. Authority over the classes ofmen to be called to military service. Baruch virtually pointed out to theProvost Marshall of the United States, the classes of men to be taken into thearmy. "We had to decide virtually the necessity of things," he said."We had to decide that the less-essential industries would have to becurbed, and it was from them that the man-power would have to be taken for thearmy."

It was, of course, necessary that someruling should be made, but by one man, why always this one man?

5. Authority over the personnel oflabor in the country. "We decided upon a dilution of men with womenlabor, which was a thing that had always been fought by the labor unions.""We fixed the prices . . . . . for the total production, not alone for thearmy and the navy, but for the Allies and the civilian population."

And now behold as complete anillustration of one part of the Protocols as ever could be found in any GentileGovernment: "We will force up wages which, however, will be of no benefitto the workers, for we will at the same time cause a rise in the prices ofnecessities"; the First Protocol.

It was not only during the war, butalso after the Armistice, that tokens of signal choice were showered on Baruch.He went to the Versailles Peace Conference as a part of the President’sentourage.

·        Mr. Baruch: "Wheneverhe asked my advice I gave it. I had something to do with the reparationsclauses. I was the American Commissioner in charge of what they called the‘Economic Section.’ I was a member of the Supreme Economic Council in chargeof raw materials."

Baruch admitted in his evidence thathe sat in council with the men who were negotiating the Peace Treaty and that heparticipated in the meeting of the "Big Five," Premiers. Jews were soconspicuous in the American Mission as to excite comment everywhere. Frenchmencalled Versailles the "Kosher Conference." So numerous and ubiquitouswere the International Jews, headed by Baruch, so firmly established in theinner circles, that the keen observer, Dr. E. J. Dillon, in his book, "TheInside Story of the Peace Conference" (Harper’s), said this:

·        "It may seem amazing tosome readers, but it is none the less a fact, that a considerable number ofdelegates believed that the real influences behind the Anglo-Saxon peoples wereSemitic." (p. 496).

And again:

·        ". . . the sequence ofexpedients framed and enforced in this direction were inspired by the Jews,assembled in Paris for the purpose of realizing their carefully thought-outprogram, which they succeeded in having substantially executed . . . The formulainto which this policy was thrown by the members of the Conference, whosecountries it affected, and who regarded it as fatal to the peace of EasternEurope, was this: ‘Henceforth the world will be governed by the Anglo Saxonpeoples, who in turn, are swayed by their Jewish elements.’" (p. 497).

This is not the whole story by anymeans.

Why was Baruch chosen to be the firstDictator of the United States? What had he been, what had he done, that heshould have been chosen as head and front of governmental power in the firstworld war, the first major war in which the United States was involved, andwhich turned that county from a debtor nation into the most powerful of all timein military and financial power? And with a minimum of military sacrifice andcomparatively trifling effort. His antecedents do not account for it. Neitherhis personal nor commercial attainments account for it. What does?

Men who can manipulate this politicaland money power in time of war can do so in time of peace. The United States isliving under some of the peace-manipulation now. The operating groups,governments, are bankrupt. Only their power of confiscation keeps them up. TheUnited States, commonly referred to as the richest country in the world, is justas poor as a government as is any other; it is in debt and borrowing. Andits creditors are constantly discounting their obligations and putting it intoworse hands than ever. The amount of our National Debt is the measure of ourenslavement to Jewish World Finance. We live in a democracy, yet loans arecontracted that always cost more than the amount of the loan, and no one has aword to say about it. We Americans do not know how much interest we pay everyyear, and we don’t know to whom we pay it.

______________________________________________________

"We shall handle the Press in thefollowing manner:

1. "We shall saddle it and keeptight reign upon it. We shall do the same also with other printed matter, for ofwhat use is it to rid ourselves of attacks in the Press, if we remain exposed tocriticism through pamphlets and books?"

2. "Not one announcement willreach the people save under our supervision. We have attained this at thepresent time to the extent that all news is received through several agencies inwhich it is centralized from all parts of the world."

3. "Literature and journalism aretwo most important educational forces, and consequently our government willbecome the owner of most of the journals. * * * If we permit ten privatejournals, we shall organize thirty of our own, and so on. This must not besuspected by the public, for which reason all the journals published by us willbe externally of the most contrary opinions and tendencies thus evokingconfidence in them and attracting our unsuspecting opponents, who thus will becaught in our trap and rendered harmless."

- The Twelfth Protocol

15. The Battle For Press Control

The first instinctive answer which theJew makes to any criticism of his race coming from a non-Jew is that ofviolence, threatened or inflicted. This statement will be confirmed by hundredsof thousands of citizens of the United States who have heard the evidence withtheir own ears, seen it with their own eyes.

If the candid investigator of theJewish Question happens to be in business, the "boycott" is the firstanswer of which the Jews seem to think. Whether it be a newspaper, or amercantile establishment, or a hotel, or a dramatic production; or anymanufactured article whose maker has adopted the policy that "my goods arefor sale, but not my principles" – if there is any manner of businessconnection with the student of the Jewish Question, the first "answer"is "boycott."

The technique of this: a"whispering drive" is first begun. Disquieting rumors begin to flythick and fast. "Watch us get him," is the word that is passed along.Jews in charge of national ticker news services adopt the slogan of "arumor a day." All leading news agencies in America are Jew-controlled. Jewsin charge of newspapers adopt the policy of a "slurring headline aday." Jews in charge of the newsboys on the streets (all the streetconcerns are pre-empted by Jewish "padrones" who permit only their ownboys to sell) give orders to emphasize certain news in their street cries –"a new yell against him every day." The whole campaign against thecritic of Jewry, whoever he may be, is keyed to the threat, "Watch us gethim." [Editor’s Note: Following the rise of the "popular"syndicated "columnist" since 1920, the word is now "smear,"it is specially prominent in political-press affairs.]

"The whispering drive,""the boycott," these are the chief Jewish answers. They constitute thebone and the sinew of that state of mind in non-Jews which is known as "thefear of the Jews."

Bennett’s Struggle

This is the story of a boycott whichlasted over a number of years; it is only one of numerous stories of thesame kind which can be told of America. There have been even more outstandingcases since this one, but it dates back to the dawn of Jewish ambitions andpower in the United States, and it is the first of the great battles which Jewrywaged, successfully, to snuff out the independent Press.

It concerns the long defunct "NewYork Herald," one newspaper to remain independent of Jewish influencein New York. The Herald enjoyed an existence of 90 years, which wasterminated in 1920 by the inevitable amalgamation. It performed great feats inthe world of news-gathering. It sent Henry M. Stanley to Africa to findLivingstone. It backed the Jeannette expedition to the Arctic regions. It waslargely instrumental in having the first Atlantic cables laid. Its reputationsamong newspaper men was that neither its news nor its editorial columns could bebought or influenced. But perhaps its greatest feat was the maintenance duringmany years of its journalistic independence against the combined attack of NewYork Jewry. Its proprietor, the late James Gordon Bennett, a great Americancitizen famed for many helpful activities, had always maintained a friendlyattitude toward the Jews of his city. He apparently harbored no prejudicesagainst them. Certainly he never deliberately antagonized them. But he wasresolved upon preserving the honor of independent journalism. He never bent tothe policy that the advertisers had something to say about the editorial policyof the paper, either as to influencing it for publication or suppression. InBennett’s time the American Press was in the majority free. Today it isentirely Jewish controlled. This control is variously exercised, sometimesresting only on the owners’ sense of expediency. But the control is there, andfor the moment it is absolute. Fifty years ago there were many more newspapersin New York than there are today, since then amalgamation has reduced thecompetition to a select few who do not compete. This development has been thesame in other countries, particularly Great Britain.

Bennett’s Herald, a threecent newspaper, enjoyed the highest prestige and was the most desirableadvertising medium due to the class of its circulation. At that time the Jewishpopulation of New York was less than one-third of what it is today, but therewas much wealth represented in it.

Now, what every newspaper man knows isthis: most Jewish leaders are always interested either in getting a storypublished or getting it suppressed. There is no class of people who read thepublic press with so careful an eye to their own affairs as do the Jews. The Heraldsimply adopted the policy from the beginning of this form of harassment that itwas not to be permitted to sway the Herald from its duty as a publicinformant. And this policy had a reflex advantage for the other newspapers inthe city.

When a scandal occurred in Jewishcircles (and at the turn of the century growing Jewish influence in Americaproduced many) influential Jews would swarm into the editorial offices toarrange for the suppression of the story. But the editors knew that the Heraldwould not suppress anything for anybody. What was the use of one papersuppressing if the others would not? So editors would say: We would be very gladto suppress this story, but the Herald will use it, so we’ll have to dothe same in self-protection. However, if you can get the Herald tosuppress it, we will gladly do so, too.

But the Herald never succumbed;neither pressure of influence nor promise of business nor threats of lossavailed. It printed the news.

There was a certain Jewish banker whoperiodically demanded that Bennett discharge the Herald’s financialeditor. The banker was in the business of disposing of Mexican bonds at a timewhen such bonds were least secure. Once when an unusually large number of bondswere to be unloaded on unsuspecting Americans, the Herald published thestory of an impending Mexican revolution, which presently ensued. The bankerfrothed at the mouth and moved every influence he could to change the Herald’sfinancial staff, but he was not able to effect the change even of an office boy.

Once when a shocking scandal involveda member of a prominent family, Bennett refused to suppress it, arguing that ifthe episode had occurred in a family of any other race it would be publishedregardless of the prominence of the figures involved. The Jews of Philadelphiasecured suppression there, but because of Bennett’s unflinching stand therewas no suppression in New York.

A newspaper is a business proposition.There are some matters it cannot touch without putting itself in peril ofbecoming defunct concern. This is especially true since newspapers no longerreceive their main support from the public but from the advertisers. The moneythe reader gives for the paper scarcely suffices to pay for the amount of whitepaper he receives. In this way, advertisers cannot be disregarded any more thanthe paper mills can be. As the most extensive advertisers in New York were, andare, the department stores, and as most department stores were, and are, ownedby Jews, it comes logically that Jews often influence the news policies of thepapers with whom they deal.

At this time, it had always been theburning ambition of the Jews to elect a Jewish Mayor of New York. They selecteda time when the leading parties were disrupted to push forward their choice. Themethod they adopted was characteristic. They reasoned that the newspapers wouldnot dare to refuse the dictum of the combined department store owners, so theydrew up a "strictly confidential" letter which they sent to the ownersof the New York newspapers, demanding support for the Jewish mayoraltycandidate. The newspaper owners were in a quandry. For several days they debatedhow to act. All remained silent. The editors of the Herald cabled thenews to Bennett who was abroad. Then it was that Bennett exhibited that boldnessand directness of judgment which characterized him. He cabled back, "Printthe letter." It was printed in the Herald, the arrogance of theJewish advertisers was exposed, and non-Jewish New York breathed easier andapplauded the action.

The Herald explained franklythat it could not support a candidate of private interests, because it wasdevoted to the interests of the public. But the Jewish leaders vowed vengeanceagainst the Herald and against the man who dared to expose their game.

They had not liked Bennett for a longtime, anyway. The Herald was the real "society paper" of NewYork, but Bennett had a rule that only the names of really prominent familiesshould be printed. The stories of the efforts of newly-rich Jews to break intothe Herald's society columns are some of the best that are told by oldnewspaper men.

The whole "war" culminatedin a contention which arose between Bennett and Nathan Straus, a German Jewwhose business house was known under the name of "R. H. Macy andCompany," Macy being the Scotsman who built up the business and from whoseheirs Straus obtained it. Straus was something of a philanthropist in theghetto, but the story goes that Bennett’s failure to proclaim him as aphilanthropist led to ill-feeling. A long newspaper-war ensued, the subject ofwhich was the pasteurization of milk – a stupid discussion which no one tookseriously, save Bennett and Straus [Editor’s Note: It is significant that, inthe long years since this first "food war," the business of"processing" and "substituting" pure foods, messing aboutwith natural food-stuffs, has developed into a world-wide business; mostlycontrolled by Jews.].

The Jews, of course, took Straus’side. Jewish speakers made the welkin ring with laudation of Nathan Straus andmaledictions upon James Bennett. Bennett was pictured in the most vile businessof "persecuting" a noble Jew. It went so far that the Jews were ableto put resolutions through the Board of Aldermen.

Long since, of course, Straus, a veryheavy advertiser, had withdrawn every dollar’s worth of his business from the Herald.And now the combined and powerful elements of New York Jewry gathered to deal astaggering blow at Bennett. The Jewish policy of "Dominate or Destroy"was at stake, and Jewry declared war.

As one man, the Jewish advertiserswithdrew their advertisements. Their assigned reason was that the Heraldwas showing animosity against the Jews. The real purpose of their action was tocrush an American newspaper owner who dared to be independent of them.

The blow they delivered was astaggering one. It meant the loss of 600,000 dollars a year. Any other newspaperin New York would have been put out of business by it. The Jews knew that andsat back, waiting for the downfall of the man they chose to consider theirenemy.

But Bennett was a fighter. Besides, heknew the Jewish psychology probably better than any other non-Jew in New York.He turned the tables on his opponents in a startling and unexpected fashion. Thecoveted positions in his papers had always been used by the Jews. These heimmediately turned over to non-Jewish merchants under exclusive contracts.Merchants who had formerly been crowded into the back pages and obscure cornersby the more opulent Jews, now blossomed forth full page in the most popularspaces. One of the non-Jewish merchants who took advantage of the new situationwas John Wanamaker, whose large advertisements from that time forward wereconspicuous in the Bennett newspapers. The Bennett papers came out withundiminished circulation and full advertising pages. The well-plannedcatastrophe did not, then occur. Instead, there was a rather comical surprise.Here were the non-Jewish merchants of America enjoying the choicest service of avaluable advertising medium, while the Jewish merchants were unrepresented.Unable to stand the spectacle of trade being diverted to non-Jewish merchants,the Jews came back to Bennett, requesting the use of his columns foradvertising. The "boycott" had been hardest on the boycotters. Bennettreceived all who came, displaying no rancor. They wanted their old positionsback, but Bennett said, No. They argued, but Bennett said, No. They offered moremoney, but Bennett said, No. The choice positions had been forfeited.

Bennett triumphed, but it proved acostly victory. All the time Bennett was resisting them, the Jews were growingmore powerful in New York, and they were obsessed by the idea that to controljournalism in New York meant to control the thought of the whole country.

The number of newspapers graduallydiminished through combinations of publications. Adolph S. Ochs, a PhiladelphiaJew, acquired the "New York Times." He soon made it into agreat newspaper, but one whose bias is to serve the Jews. It is the quality ofthe Times as a newspaper that makes it so weighty as a Jewish organ. Inthis paper the Jews are persistently lauded, eulogized and defended; no suchtenderness is granted other races.

 Then Hearst came into the field– a dangerous agitator because he not only agitates the wrong things, butbecause he agitates the wrong class of people. He surrounded himself with acoterie of Jews, pandered to them, worked hand in glove with them, but nevertold the truth about them; never "gave them away."

The trend toward Jewish control of thepress set in strongly, and has continued that way ever since. The old names,made great by great editors and American policies, slowly dimmed.

A newspaper is founded either on agreat editorial mind, in which event it becomes the expression of a powerfulpersonality, or it becomes institutionalized as to policy and becomes acommercial establishment. In the latter event, its chances for continuing lifebeyond the lifetime of its founder are much stronger.

The Herald was Bennett, andwith his passing it was inevitable that a certain force and virtue should departout of it. Bennett, advancing in age, dreaded lest his newspaper, on his deathshould fall into the hands of the Jews. He knew that they regarded it withlonging. He knew that they had pulled down, seized, and afterward built up manyan agency that had dared to speak the truth about them, and boasted about it asa conquest for Jewry.

Bennett loved the Herald as aman loves a child. He so arranged his will that the Herald should notfall into individual ownership, but that its revenues should flow into a fundfor the benefit of the men who had worked to make the Herald what it was.He died in May, 1919. The Jewish enemies of the Herald, eagerly watchful,once more withdrew their advertising to force, if possible, the sale of thenewspaper. They knew that if the Herald became a losing proposition, thetrustees would have no course but to sell, notwithstanding Bennett’s will.

But there were also interests in NewYork who were beginning to realize the peril of a Jewish press. These interestsprovided a sum of money for the Herald’s purchase by Frank A. Munsey.

Then, to general astonishment, Munseydiscontinued the gallant old paper, and bestowed its name as part of the name ofthe "New York Sun."

The newspaper managed by Bennett isextinct. The men who work on it were scattered abroad in the newspaper fieldand, in the main, retired or dead.

Even though the Jews had not gainedactual possession of the Herald, they at least succeeded in drivinganother non-Jewish newspaper from the field. They set about obtaining control ofseveral newspapers, their victory is now complete. But the victory was afinancial victory over a dead man. The moral victory, as well as the financialvictory, remained with Bennett while he lived; the moral victory still remainswith the Herald. It demonstrated what could be done by fearless,independent minds, supported by men who knew their work and loved it for its ownsake. It demonstrated what could have been achieved had these men received thesupport of wide-awake, active, non-Jewish Americans. The Herald isimmortalized as the last bulwark against Jewry in New York, in America. Todaythe Jews are more completely masters of the journalistic field in New York thanthey are in any capital in Europe. Indeed, in Europe there frequently emerges anewspaper that gives the real news of the Jews. There is none in New York.

 And thus the situation willremain until Americans shake themselves from their long sleep, and look withsteady eyes at the national situation. That look will be enough to show themall, and their very eyes will quail the oriental usurpers.

____________________________________________________________

"Our triumph been rendered easierby the fact that in our relations with the men whom we wanted we have alwaysworked upon the most sensitive chords of the human mind, upon the cash account,upon the cupidity, upon the insatiability for material needs of man; and eachone of these human weaknesses, taken alone, is sufficient to paralyzeinitiative, for it hands over the will of men to the disposition of him who hasbought their activities."

- The First Protocol

16. The State Of All-Judaan

 Judaism is the most closely organizedpower on earth. It forms a State whose citizens are unconditionally loyalwherever they may be and whether rich or poor.

 The name which is given to thisState, which circulates among all the states, is "All-Judaan."

The means of power of the State ofAl-Judaan are capital and journalism, or money and propaganda.

All-Judaan is the only State thatexercises world government; all the other States can and may exercise nationalgovernment only.

The principal culture of All-Judaan isjournalistic; the technical, scientific, literary performances of the modern Jeware throughout journalistic performances. They are due to the marvellous talentof the Jews for receptivity of others’ ideas. Capital and Journalism arejoined in the Press to create a political and spiritual medium of Jewish power.

The government of this State ofAll-Judaan is wonderfully organized. Paris was the first seat, but has now beenmoved to a lower place. Before 1914 London was its first, and New York itssecond capital. New York now supplants London.

All-Judaan is not in a position tohave a standing army and navy, other states supply these for it. It was theBritish Fleet which guarded from hindrance the progress of all-Jewish worldeconomy, or that part of it which depends on the sea. In return, All-Judaanassured Britain an undisturbed political and territorial rule.

Then New York supplanted London. Thedrift of the Jews in the 19th century expedited into a great flood after WorldWar I, made the United States the seat of Jewish power and influence."America," and her fleets, armies, citizens, takes the place ofBritain as the "ruler of the world." It merely means that Jewry hasmoved from the British Empire to the American Continent.

All-Judaan is willing to entrust thegovernment of various strips of the world to nationalistic governments; it onlyasks to control the governments. Judaism is passionately in favor ofperpetuating nationalistic divisions for the Gentile world. For themselves, Jewsnever became assimilated with any nation. They are a separate people, alwayswere and always will be.

All-Judaan’s only quarrel with anynation occurs when that nation makes it impossible, or tries to make it so, forAll-Judaan to control that nation’s industrial and financial profits. It canmake war, it can make peace; it can command anarchy in stubborn cases, it canrestore order. It holds the sinews of world power in its hand and it apportionsthem among the nations in such ways as will best support All-Judaan’s plan.

Controlling the world’s source ofnews, All-Judaan can always prepare the minds of the people for its next move.The greatest exposure yet to be made is the way that news is manufactured andthe way in which the mind of whole nations is moulded for a purpose.

When the powerful Jew is at lasttraced and his hand revealed, then comes the ready cry of persecution and itechoes through the world press. The real cause of the persecution (which is theoppression of the people by the financial practices of the Jews) is never givenpublicity.

All-Judaan has its vice-governments inevery capital. Having wreaked its vengeance on Germany, it will go forth toconquer other nations. Britain it already has. France and Russia it has longheld. The United States, with its good-natured tolerance of all races, offered apromising field. All-Judaan is here. The scene of operations changes, but theJew is the same throughout the centuries.